Automated knowledge extraction from polymer literature using natural language processing.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Shetty P
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7797509 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Jan
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Automated knowledge extraction from polymer literature using natural language processing.
Shetty Pranav P Ramprasad Rampi R
iScience 20201210 1
Materials science literature has grown exponentially in recent years making it difficult for individuals to master all of this information. This constrains the formulation of new hypotheses that scientists can come up with. In this work, we explore whether materials science knowledge can be automatically inferred from textual information contained in journal papers. Using a data set of 0.5 million polymer papers, we show, using natural language processing methods that vector representations trai ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundMulti-center electronic health records (EHR) can support quality improvement initiatives and comparative effectiveness research in stroke care. However, limitations of EHR-based research include challenges in abstracting key clinical variables from non-structured data at scale. This is further compounded by missing data. Here we develop a natural language processing (NLP) model that automatically reads EHR notes to determine the NIH stroke scale (NIHSS) score of patients with acute stroke.MethodsThe study included notes from acute stroke patients (>= 18 years) admitted to the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) (2015-2022). The MGH data were divided into training (70%) and hold-out test (30%) sets. A two-stage model was developed to predict the admission NIHSS. A linear model with the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) was trained within the training set. For notes in the test set where the NIHSS was documented, the scores were extracted using regular expressions (stage 1), for notes where NIHSS was not documented, LASSO was used for prediction (stage 2). The reference standard for NIHSS was obtained from Get With The Guidelines Stroke Registry. The two-stage model was tested on the hold-out test set and validated in the MIMIC-III dataset (Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-MIMIC III 2001-2012) v1.4, using root mean squared error (RMSE) and Spearman correlation (SC).ResultsWe included 4,163 patients (MGH = 3,876; MIMIC = 287); average age of 69 [SD 15] years; 53% male, and 72% white. 90% patients had ischemic stroke and 10% hemorrhagic stroke. The two-stage model achieved a RMSE [95% CI] of 3.13 [2.86-3.41] (SC = 0.90 [0.88-0. 91]) in the MGH hold-out test set and 2.01 [1.58-2.38] (SC = 0.96 [0.94-0.97]) in the MIMIC validation set.ConclusionsThe automatic NLP-based model can enable large-scale stroke severity phenotyping from EHR and therefore support real-world quality improvement and comparative effectiveness studies in stroke.
| S-EPMC10980121 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Most of the knowledge in materials science literature is in the form of unstructured data such as text and images. Here, we present a framework employing natural language processing, which automates text and image comprehension and precision knowledge extraction from inorganic glasses' literature. The abstracts are automatically categorized using latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) to classify and search semantically linked publications. Similarly, a comprehensive summary of images and plots is presented using the caption cluster plot (CCP), providing direct access to images buried in the papers. Finally, we combine the LDA and CCP with chemical elements to present an elemental map, a topical and image-wise distribution of elements occurring in the literature. Overall, the framework presented here can be a generic and powerful tool to extract and disseminate material-specific information on composition-structure-processing-property dataspaces, allowing insights into fundamental problems relevant to the materials science community and accelerated materials discovery.
| S-EPMC8276010 | biostudies-literature
Project description:AimsStress echocardiography (SE) findings and interpretations are commonly documented in free-text reports. Reusing SE results requires laborious manual reviews. This study aimed to develop and validate an automated method for abstracting SE reports in a large cohort.Methods and resultsThis study included adult patients who had SE within 30 days of their emergency department visit for suspected acute coronary syndrome in a large integrated healthcare system. An automated natural language processing (NLP) algorithm was developed to abstract SE reports and classify overall SE results into normal, non-diagnostic, infarction, and ischaemia categories. Randomly selected reports (n = 140) were double-blindly reviewed by cardiologists to perform criterion validity of the NLP algorithm. Construct validity was tested on the entire cohort using abstracted SE data and additional clinical variables. The NLP algorithm abstracted 6346 consecutive SE reports. Cardiologists had good agreements on the overall SE results on the 140 reports: Kappa (0.83) and intraclass correlation coefficient (0.89). The NLP algorithm achieved 98.6% specificity and negative predictive value, 95.7% sensitivity, positive predictive value, and F-score on the overall SE results and near-perfect scores on ischaemia findings. The 30-day acute myocardial infarction or death outcomes were highest among patients with ischaemia (5.0%), followed by infarction (1.4%), non-diagnostic (0.8%), and normal (0.3%) results. We found substantial variations in the format and quality of SE reports, even within the same institution.ConclusionsNatural language processing is an accurate and efficient method for abstracting unstructured SE reports. This approach creates new opportunities for research, public health measures, and care improvement.
| S-EPMC9779789 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundFindings and interpretations of myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) studies are documented in free-text MPI reports. MPI results are essential for research, but manual review is prohibitively time consuming. This study aimed to develop and validate an automated method to abstract MPI reports.MethodsWe developed a natural language processing (NLP) algorithm to abstract MPI reports. Randomly selected reports were double-blindly reviewed by two cardiologists to validate the NLP algorithm. Secondary analyses were performed to describe patient outcomes based on abstracted-MPI results on 16,957 MPI tests from adult patients evaluated for suspected ACS.ResultsThe NLP algorithm achieved high sensitivity (96.7%) and specificity (98.9%) on the MPI categorical results and had a similar degree of agreement compared to the physician reviewers. Patients with abnormal MPI results had higher rates of 30-day acute myocardial infarction or death compared to patients with normal results. We identified issues related to the quality of the reports that not only affect communication with referring physicians but also challenges for automated abstraction.ConclusionNLP is an accurate and efficient strategy to abstract results from the free-text MPI reports. Our findings will facilitate future research to understand the benefits of MPI studies but requires validation in other settings.
| S-EPMC8096860 | biostudies-literature
Project description:We sought to apply natural language processing to the task of automatic risk of bias assessment in preclinical literature, which could speed the process of systematic review, provide information to guide research improvement activity, and support translation from preclinical to clinical research. We use 7840 full-text publications describing animal experiments with yes/no annotations for five risk of bias items. We implement a series of models including baselines (support vector machine, logistic regression, random forest), neural models (convolutional neural network, recurrent neural network with attention, hierarchical neural network) and models using BERT with two strategies (document chunk pooling and sentence extraction). We tune hyperparameters to obtain the highest F1 scores for each risk of bias item on the validation set and compare evaluation results on the test set to our previous regular expression approach. The F1 scores of best models on test set are 82.0% for random allocation, 81.6% for blinded assessment of outcome, 82.6% for conflict of interests, 91.4% for compliance with animal welfare regulations and 46.6% for reporting animals excluded from analysis. Our models significantly outperform regular expressions for four risk of bias items. For random allocation, blinded assessment of outcome, conflict of interests and animal exclusions, neural models achieve good performance; for animal welfare regulations, BERT model with a sentence extraction strategy works better. Convolutional neural networks are the overall best models. The tool is publicly available which may contribute to the future monitoring of risk of bias reporting for research improvement activities.
| S-EPMC9298308 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundPeriprosthetic joint infection (PJI) data elements are contained in both structured and unstructured documents in electronic health records and require manual data collection. The goal of this study is to develop a natural language processing (NLP) algorithm to replicate manual chart review for PJI data elements.MethodsPJI was identified among all total joint arthroplasty (TJA) procedures performed at a single academic institution between 2000 and 2017. Data elements that comprise the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria were manually extracted and used as the gold standard for validation. A training sample of 1208 TJA surgeries (170 PJI cases) was randomly selected to develop the prototype NLP algorithms and an additional 1179 surgeries (150 PJI cases) were randomly selected as the test sample. The algorithms were applied to all consultation notes, operative notes, pathology reports, and microbiology reports to predict the correct status of PJI based on MSIS criteria.ResultsThe algorithm, which identified patients with PJI based on MSIS criteria, achieved an f1-score (harmonic mean of precision and recall) of 0.911. Algorithm performance in extracting the presence of sinus tract, purulence, pathologic documentation of inflammation, and growth of cultured organisms from the involved TJA achieved f1-scores that ranged from 0.771 to 0.982, sensitivity that ranged from 0.730 to 1.000, and specificity that ranged from 0.947 to 1.000.ConclusionNLP-enabled algorithms have the potential to automate data collection for PJI diagnostic elements, which could directly improve patient care and augment cohort surveillance and research efforts. Further validation is needed in other hospital settings.Level of evidenceLevel III, Diagnostic.
| S-EPMC7855617 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundInformation pertaining to mechanisms, management and treatment of disease-causing pathogens including viruses and bacteria is readily available from research publications indexed in MEDLINE. However, identifying the literature that specifically characterises these pathogens and their properties based on experimental research, important for understanding of the molecular basis of diseases caused by these agents, requires sifting through a large number of articles to exclude incidental mentions of the pathogens, or references to pathogens in other non-experimental contexts such as public health.ObjectiveIn this work, we lay the foundations for the development of automatic methods for characterising mentions of pathogens in scientific literature, focusing on the task of identifying research that involves the experimental study of a pathogen in an experimental context. There are no manually annotated pathogen corpora available for this purpose, while such resources are necessary to support the development of machine learning-based models. We therefore aim to fill this gap, producing a large data set automatically from MEDLINE under some simplifying assumptions for the task definition, and using it to explore automatic methods that specifically support the detection of experimentally studied pathogen mentions in research publications.MethodsWe developed a pathogen mention characterisation literature data set -READBiomed-Pathogens- automatically using NCBI resources, which we make available. Resources such as the NCBI Taxonomy, MeSH and GenBank can be used effectively to identify relevant literature about experimentally researched pathogens, more specifically using MeSH to link to MEDLINE citations including titles and abstracts with experimentally researched pathogens. We experiment with several machine learning-based natural language processing (NLP) algorithms leveraging this data set as training data, to model the task of detecting papers that specifically describe experimental study of a pathogen.ResultsWe show that our data set READBiomed-Pathogens can be used to explore natural language processing configurations for experimental pathogen mention characterisation. READBiomed-Pathogens includes citations related to organisms including bacteria, viruses, and a small number of toxins and other disease-causing agents.ConclusionsWe studied the characterisation of experimentally studied pathogens in scientific literature, developing several natural language processing methods supported by an automatically developed data set. As a core contribution of the work, we presented a methodology to automatically construct a data set for pathogen identification using existing biomedical resources. The data set and the annotation code are made publicly available. Performance of the pathogen mention identification and characterisation algorithms were additionally evaluated on a small manually annotated data set shows that the data set that we have generated allows characterising pathogens of interest.Trial registrationN/A.
| S-EPMC9889128 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionPrevious biomedical studies identified many lifestyle exposures that could possibly represent risk factors for dementia in general or dementia due to Alzheimer's disease (AD). These lifestyle exposures are mainly mentioned in free-text electronic health records (EHRs). However, automatic extraction and assessment of these exposures using EHRs remains understudied.MethodsA natural language processing (NLP) approach was adopted to extract lifestyle exposures and intervention strategies from the clinical notes of 260 patients with clinical diagnoses of AD dementia and 260 age-matched cognitively unimpaired persons. Statistics of lifestyle exposures were compared between these two groups. The mapping results of the NLP extraction were evaluated by comparing the results with data captured independently by clinicians.ResultsThirty out of fifty-five potentially relevant lifestyle exposures were mentioned in our clinical note dataset. Twenty-two dietary factors and three substance abuses that were potentially relevant were not found in clinical notes. Patients with AD dementia were significantly exposed to more of the potential risk factors compared to the cognitively unimpaired subjects (χ2 = 120.31, p-value < 0.001). The average accuracy of the automated extraction was 74.0% in comparison with the manual review of randomly selected 50 sample documents.Discussion and conclusionWe illustrated the feasibility of NLP techniques for the automated evaluation of a large number lifestyle habits using free-text EHR data. We found that AD dementia patients were exposed to more of the potential risk factors than the comparison group. Our results also demonstrated the feasibility and accuracy of investigating putative risk factors using NLP techniques.
| S-EPMC6750723 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesThere is much interest in utilizing clinical data for developing prediction models for Alzheimer's disease (AD) risk, progression, and outcomes. Existing studies have mostly utilized curated research registries, image analysis, and structured electronic health record (EHR) data. However, much critical information resides in relatively inaccessible unstructured clinical notes within the EHR.Materials and methodsWe developed a natural language processing (NLP)-based pipeline to extract AD-related clinical phenotypes, documenting strategies for success and assessing the utility of mining unstructured clinical notes. We evaluated the pipeline against gold-standard manual annotations performed by 2 clinical dementia experts for AD-related clinical phenotypes including medical comorbidities, biomarkers, neurobehavioral test scores, behavioral indicators of cognitive decline, family history, and neuroimaging findings.ResultsDocumentation rates for each phenotype varied in the structured versus unstructured EHR. Interannotator agreement was high (Cohen's kappa = 0.72-1) and positively correlated with the NLP-based phenotype extraction pipeline's performance (average F1-score = 0.65-0.99) for each phenotype.DiscussionWe developed an automated NLP-based pipeline to extract informative phenotypes that may improve the performance of eventual machine learning predictive models for AD. In the process, we examined documentation practices for each phenotype relevant to the care of AD patients and identified factors for success.ConclusionSuccess of our NLP-based phenotype extraction pipeline depended on domain-specific knowledge and focus on a specific clinical domain instead of maximizing generalizability.
| S-EPMC9952043 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The autobiographical interview has been used in more than 200 studies to assess the content of autobiographical memories. In a typical experiment, participants recall memories, which are then scored manually for internal details (episodic details from the central event) and external details (largely non-episodic details). Scoring these narratives requires a significant amount of time. As a result, large studies with this procedure are often impractical, and even conducting small studies is time-consuming. To reduce scoring burden and enable larger studies, we developed an approach to automatically score responses with natural language processing. We fine-tuned an existing language model (distilBERT) to identify the amount of internal and external content in each sentence. These predictions were aggregated to obtain internal and external content estimates for each narrative. We evaluated our model by comparing manual scores with automated scores in five datasets. We found that our model performed well across datasets. In four datasets, we found a strong correlation between internal detail counts and the amount of predicted internal content. In these datasets, manual and automated external scores were also strongly correlated, and we found minimal misclassification of content. In a fifth dataset, our model performed well after additional preprocessing. To make automated scoring available to other researchers, we provide a Colab notebook that is intended to be used without additional coding.
| S-EPMC10990986 | biostudies-literature