Using the Standardized Root Mean Squared Residual (SRMR) to Assess Exact Fit in Structural Equation Models.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Pavlov G
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7797960 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:Structural equation modeling (SEM) provides an extensive toolbox to analyze the multivariate interrelations of directly observed variables and latent constructs. Multilevel SEM integrates mixed effects to examine the covariances between observed and latent variables across many levels of analysis. However, while it is necessary to consider model fit, traditional indices are largely insufficient to analyze model fit at each level of analysis. The present paper reviews i) the partially-saturated model fit approach first suggested by Ryu and West (2009) and ii) an alternative model parameterization that removes the multilevel data structure. We next describe the implementation of an algorithm to compute partially-saturated model fit for 2-level structural equation models in the open source SEM package, OpenMx, including verification in a simulation study. Finally, an example empirical application evaluates leading theories on the structure of affect from ecological momentary assessment data collected thrice daily for two weeks from 345 participants.
| S-EPMC7410097 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Coarse structural nested mean models are tools to estimate treatment effects from longitudinal observational data with time-dependent confounding. There is, however, no guidance on how to specify the treatment effect model, and model misspecification can lead to bias. We derive a goodness-of-fit test based on modified overidentification restrictions tests for evaluating a treatment effect model, and show that our test statistic is doubly-robust in the sense that, with a correct treatment effect model, the test has the correct type-I error if either the treatment initiation model or a nuisance regression outcome model is correctly specified. In a simulation study we show that the test has correct type-I error and can detect model misspecification. We use the test to study how the timing of antiretroviral treatment initiation after HIV infection predicts the effect of one year of treatment in HIV-positive patients with acute and early infection.
| S-EPMC5152627 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Mean residual life (MRL) function defines the remaining life expectancy of a subject who has survived to a time point and is an important alternative to the hazard function for characterizing the distribution of a time-to-event variable. Existing MRL models primarily focus on studying the association between risk factors and disease risks using linear model specifications in multiplicative or additive scale. When risk factors have complex correlation structures, nonlinear effects, or interactions, the prefixed linearity assumption may be insufficient to capture the relationship. Single-index modeling framework offers flexibility in reducing dimensionality and modeling nonlinear effects. In this article, we propose a class of partially linear single-index generalized MRL models, the regression component of which consists of both a semiparametric single-index part and a linear regression part. Regression spline technique is employed to approximate the nonparametric single-index function, and parameters are estimated using an iterative algorithm. Double-robust estimators are also proposed to protect against the misspecification of censoring distribution or MRL models. A further contribution of this article is a nonparametric test proposed to formally evaluate the linearity of the single-index function. Asymptotic properties of the estimators are established, and the finite-sample performance is evaluated through extensive numerical simulations. The proposed models and inference approaches are demonstrated by a New York University Langone Health (NYULH) COVID-19 dataset.
| S-EPMC8595843 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The Purcell effect, i.e., the modification of the spontaneous emission rate by optical interference, profoundly affects the light-matter coupling in optical resonators. Fully describing the optical absorption, emission, and interference of light hence conventionally requires combining the full Maxwell's equations with stochastic or quantum optical source terms accounting for the quantum nature of light. We show that both the nonlocal wave and local particle features associated with interference and emission of propagating fields in stratified geometries can be fully captured by local damping and scattering coefficients derived from the recently introduced quantized fluctuational electrodynamics (QFED) framework. In addition to describing the nonlocal optical interference processes as local directionally resolved effects, this allows reformulating the well known and widely used radiative transfer equation (RTE) as a physically transparent interference-exact model that extends the useful range of computationally efficient and quantum optically accurate interference-aware optical models from simple structures to full optical devices.
| S-EPMC5599544 | biostudies-other
Project description:Ratio estimators of effect are ordinarily obtained by exponentiating maximum-likelihood estimators (MLEs) of log-linear or logistic regression coefficients. These estimators can display marked positive finite-sample bias, however. We propose a simple correction that removes a substantial portion of the bias due to exponentiation. By combining this correction with bias correction on the log scale, we demonstrate that one achieves complete removal of second-order bias in odds ratio estimators in important special cases. We show how this approach extends to address bias in odds or risk ratio estimators in many common regression settings. We also propose a class of estimators that provide reduced mean bias and squared error, while allowing the investigator to control the risk of underestimating the true ratio parameter. We present simulation studies in which the proposed estimators are shown to exhibit considerable reduction in bias, variance, and mean squared error compared to MLEs. Bootstrapping provides further improvement, including narrower confidence intervals without sacrificing coverage.
| S-EPMC3433076 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Mendelian randomization (MR) is a type of instrumental variable (IV) analysis that uses genetic variants as IVs for a risk factor to study its causal effect on an outcome. Extensive investigations on the performance of IV analysis procedures, such as the one based on the two-stage least squares (2SLS) procedure, have been conducted under the one-sample scenario, where measures on IVs, the risk factor, and the outcome are assumed to be available for each study participant. Recent MR analysis usually is performed with data from two independent or partially overlapping genetic association studies (two-sample setting), with one providing information on the association between the IVs and the outcome, and the other on the association between the IVs and the risk factor. We investigate the performance of 2SLS in the two-sample-based MR when the IVs are weakly associated with the risk factor. We derive closed form formulas for the bias and mean squared error of the 2SLS estimate and verify them with numeric simulations under realistic circumstances. Using these analytic formulas, we can study the pros and cons of conducting MR analysis under one-sample and two-sample settings and assess the impact of having overlapping samples. We also propose and validate a bias-corrected estimator for the causal effect.
| S-EPMC7182476 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The behaviour of many processes in science and engineering can be accurately described by dynamical system models consisting of a set of ordinary differential equations (ODEs). Often these models have several unknown parameters that are difficult to estimate from experimental data, in which case Bayesian inference can be a useful tool. In principle, exact Bayesian inference using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) techniques is possible; however, in practice, such methods may suffer from slow convergence and poor mixing. To address this problem, several approaches based on approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) have been introduced, including Markov chain Monte Carlo ABC (MCMC ABC) and sequential Monte Carlo ABC (SMC ABC). While the system of ODEs describes the underlying process that generates the data, the observed measurements invariably include errors. In this paper, we argue that several popular ABC approaches fail to adequately model these errors because the acceptance probability depends on the choice of the discrepancy function and the tolerance without any consideration of the error term. We observe that the so-called posterior distributions derived from such methods do not accurately reflect the epistemic uncertainties in parameter values. Moreover, we demonstrate that these methods provide minimal computational advantages over exact Bayesian methods when applied to two ODE epidemiological models with simulated data and one with real data concerning malaria transmission in Afghanistan.
| S-EPMC7137938 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Methods for random-effects meta-analysis require an estimate of the between-study variance, ?2 . The performance of estimators of ?2 (measured by bias and coverage) affects their usefulness in assessing heterogeneity of study-level effects and also the performance of related estimators of the overall effect. However, as we show, the performance of the methods varies widely among effect measures. For the effect measures mean difference (MD) and standardized MD (SMD), we use improved effect-measure-specific approximations to the expected value of Q for both MD and SMD to introduce two new methods of point estimation of ?2 for MD (Welch-type and corrected DerSimonian-Laird) and one WT interval method. We also introduce one point estimator and one interval estimator for ?2 in SMD. Extensive simulations compare our methods with four point estimators of ?2 (the popular methods of DerSimonian-Laird, restricted maximum likelihood, and Mandel and Paule, and the less-familiar method of Jackson) and four interval estimators for ?2 (profile likelihood, Q-profile, Biggerstaff and Jackson, and Jackson). We also study related point and interval estimators of the overall effect, including an estimator whose weights use only study-level sample sizes. We provide measure-specific recommendations from our comprehensive simulation study and discuss an example.
| S-EPMC6916299 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Ecological momentary assessment and other modern data collection technologies facilitate research on both within-subject and between-subject variability of health outcomes and behaviors. For such intensively measured longitudinal data, Hedeker et al extended the usual two-level mixed-effects model to a two-level mixed-effects location scale (MELS) model to accommodate covariates' influence as well as random subject effects on both mean (location) and variability (scale) of the outcome. However, there is a lack of existing standardized effect size measures for the MELS model. To fill this gap, our study extends Rights and Sterba's framework of R2$$ {R}^2 $$ measures for multilevel models, which is based on model-implied variances, to MELS models. Our proposed framework applies to two different specifications of the random location effects, namely, through covariate-influenced random intercepts and through random intercepts combined with random slopes of observation-level covariates. We also provide an R function, R2MELS, that outputs summary tables and visualization for values of our R2$$ {R}^2 $$ measures. This framework is validated through a simulation study, and data from a health behaviors study and a depression study are used as examples to demonstrate this framework. These R2$$ {R}^2 $$ measures can help researchers provide greater interpretation of their findings using MELS models.
| S-EPMC9481677 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Nearest neighbor spatial interpolation for mapping continuous populations and finite populations of areas or units is approached from a design-based perspective, that is, populations are fixed, and uncertainty stems from the sampling scheme adopted to select locations. We derive conditions for design-based pointwise and uniform consistency of the nearest neighbor interpolators. We prove that consistency holds under certain schemes that are widely applied in environmental and forest surveys. Furthermore, we propose a pseudopopulation bootstrap estimator of the root mean squared errors of the interpolated values. Finally, a simulation study is performed to assess the theoretical results.
| S-EPMC10078774 | biostudies-literature