Predictive accuracy of markers or risk scores for interval censored survival data.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Wu Y
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7806230 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Aug
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Predictive accuracy of markers or risk scores for interval censored survival data.
Wu Yuan Y Wang Xiaofei X Lin Jiaxing J Jia Beilin B Owzar Kouros K
Statistics in medicine 20200415 18
Methods for the evaluation of the predictive accuracy of biomarkers with respect to survival outcomes subject to right censoring have been discussed extensively in the literature. In cancer and other diseases, survival outcomes are commonly subject to interval censoring by design or due to the follow up schema. In this article, we present an estimator for the area under the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for interval censored data based on a nonparametric sieve maxi ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:We develop methods for assessing the predictive accuracy of a given event time model when the validation sample is comprised of case $K$ interval-censored data. An imputation-based, an inverse probability weighted (IPW), and an augmented inverse probability weighted (AIPW) estimator are developed and evaluated for the mean prediction error and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve when the goal is to predict event status at a landmark time. The weights used for the IPW and AIPW estimators are obtained by fitting a multistate model which jointly considers the event process, the recurrent assessment process, and loss to follow-up. We empirically investigate the performance of the proposed methods and illustrate their application in the context of a motivating rheumatology study in which human leukocyte antigen markers are used to predict disease progression status in patients with psoriatic arthritis.
| S-EPMC8974097 | biostudies-literature
Project description:In this manuscript we propose a spline-based sieve nonparametric maximum likelihood estimation method for joint distribution function with bivariate interval-censored data. We study the asymptotic behavior of the proposed estimator by proving the consistency and deriving the rate of convergence. Based on the sieve estimate of the joint distribution, we also develop an efficient nonparametric test for making inference about the dependence between two interval-censored event times and establish its asymptotic normality. We conduct simulation studies to examine the finite sample performance of the proposed methodology. Finally we apply the method to assess the association between two subtypes of mild cognitive impairment (MCI): amnestic MCI and non-amnestic MCI, for Huntington disease (HD) using data from a 12-year observational cohort study on premanifest HD individuals, PREDICT-HD.
| S-EPMC9255676 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Polygenic scores have recently been used to summarise genetic effects among an ensemble of markers that do not individually achieve significance in a large-scale association study. Markers are selected using an initial training sample and used to construct a score in an independent replication sample by forming the weighted sum of associated alleles within each subject. Association between a trait and this composite score implies that a genetic signal is present among the selected markers, and the score can then be used for prediction of individual trait values. This approach has been used to obtain evidence of a genetic effect when no single markers are significant, to establish a common genetic basis for related disorders, and to construct risk prediction models. In some cases, however, the desired association or prediction has not been achieved. Here, the power and predictive accuracy of a polygenic score are derived from a quantitative genetics model as a function of the sizes of the two samples, explained genetic variance, selection thresholds for including a marker in the score, and methods for weighting effect sizes in the score. Expressions are derived for quantitative and discrete traits, the latter allowing for case/control sampling. A novel approach to estimating the variance explained by a marker panel is also proposed. It is shown that published studies with significant association of polygenic scores have been well powered, whereas those with negative results can be explained by low sample size. It is also shown that useful levels of prediction may only be approached when predictors are estimated from very large samples, up to an order of magnitude greater than currently available. Therefore, polygenic scores currently have more utility for association testing than predicting complex traits, but prediction will become more feasible as sample sizes continue to grow.
| S-EPMC3605113 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The substantial heritability of most complex diseases suggests that genetic data could provide useful risk prediction. To date the performance of genetic risk scores has fallen short of the potential implied by heritability, but this can be explained by insufficient sample sizes for estimating highly polygenic models. When risk predictors already exist based on environment or lifestyle, two key questions are to what extent can they be improved by adding genetic information, and what is the ultimate potential of combined genetic and environmental risk scores? Here, we extend previous work on the predictive accuracy of polygenic scores to allow for an environmental score that may be correlated with the polygenic score, for example when the environmental factors mediate the genetic risk. We derive common measures of predictive accuracy and improvement as functions of the training sample size, chip heritabilities of disease and environmental score, and genetic correlation between disease and environmental risk factors. We consider simple addition of the two scores and a weighted sum that accounts for their correlation. Using examples from studies of cardiovascular disease and breast cancer, we show that improvements in discrimination are generally small but reasonable degrees of reclassification could be obtained with current sample sizes. Correlation between genetic and environmental scores has only minor effects on numerical results in realistic scenarios. In the longer term, as the accuracy of polygenic scores improves they will come to dominate the predictive accuracy compared to environmental scores.
| S-EPMC5847122 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Electronic health records are a large and cost-effective data source for developing risk-prediction models. However, for screen-detected diseases, standard risk models (such as Kaplan-Meier or Cox models) do not account for key issues encountered with electronic health record data: left-censoring of pre-existing (prevalent) disease, interval-censoring of incident disease, and ambiguity of whether disease is prevalent or incident when definitive disease ascertainment is not conducted at baseline. Furthermore, researchers might conduct novel screening tests only on a complex two-phase subsample. We propose a family of weighted mixture models that account for left/interval-censoring and complex sampling via inverse-probability weighting in order to estimate current and future absolute risk: we propose a weakly-parametric model for general use and a semiparametric model for checking goodness of fit of the weakly-parametric model. We demonstrate asymptotic properties analytically and by simulation. We used electronic health records to assemble a cohort of 33,295 human papillomavirus (HPV) positive women undergoing cervical cancer screening at Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) that underlie current screening guidelines. The next guidelines would focus on HPV typing tests, but reporting 14 HPV types is too complex for clinical use. National Cancer Institute along with KPNC conducted a HPV typing test on a complex subsample of 9258 women in the cohort. We used our model to estimate the risk due to each type and grouped the 14 types (the 3-year risk ranges 21.9-1.5) into 4 risk-bands to simplify reporting to clinicians and guidelines. These risk-bands could be adopted by future HPV typing tests and future screening guidelines.
| S-EPMC6586434 | biostudies-other
Project description:ObjectiveNovice drivers who delay in driving licensure may miss safety benefits of Graduate Driver Licensing (GDL) programs, potentially putting themselves at higher crash-risk. Time to licensure relates their access to independent transportation to potential future economic- and educational-related opportunities. The objective of this study was to explore time to licensure associations with teens' race/ethnicity and GDL restrictions.MethodsSecondary analysis using all seven annual assessments of the NEXT Generation Health Study, a nationally representative longitudinal study starting with 10th grade (N = 2785; 2009-2010 school year). Data were collected in U.S. public/private schools, colleges, workplaces, and other settings. The outcome variable was interval-censored time to licensure (event = obtained driving licensure). Independent variables included race/ethnicity and state-specific GDL restrictions. Covariates included family affluence, parent education, nativity, sex, and urbanicity. Proportional hazards (PH) models were conducted for interval-censored survival analysis based on stepwise backward elimination for fitting multivariate models with consideration of complex survey features. In the PH models, a hazard ratio (HR) estimates a greater (>1) or lesser (<1) likelihood of licensure at all timepoints.ResultsMedian time to licensure after reaching legal driving age for Latinos, African Americans, and Non-Latino Whites was 3.47, 2.90, and 0.41 years, respectively. Multivariate PH models showed that Latinos were 46% less likely (HR = 0.54, 95%CI: 0.35-0.72) and African Americans were 56% less likely (HR = 0.44, 95%CI: 0.32-0.56) to have obtained licensure at any time compared to Non-Latino Whites. Only learner minimum age GDL restriction was associated with time to licensure. Living in a state with a required learner driving minimum age of ≥16 years (HR = 0.57, 95%CI: 0.16-0.98) also corresponded with 43% lower likelihood of licensure at legal eligibility compared to living in other states with a required learner driving minimum age of <16 years.ConclusionLatinos and African American teens obtained their license approximately three years after eligibility on average, and much later than Non-Latino Whites. Time to licensure likelihood was associated with race/ethnicity and required minimum age of learner permit, indicating important implications for teens of different racial/ethnic groups in relation to licensure, access to independent transportation, and exposure to GDL programs.
| S-EPMC8409171 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The case-cohort design has been widely used as a means of cost reduction in assembling or measuring expensive covariates in large cohort studies. The existing literature on the case-cohort design is mainly focused on right-censored data. In practice, however, the failure time is often subject to interval-censoring; it is known only to fall within some random time interval. In this paper, we consider the case-cohort study design for interval-censored failure time and develop a sieve semiparametric likelihood approach for analyzing data from this design under the proportional hazards model. We construct the likelihood function using inverse probability weighting and build the sieves with Bernstein polynomials. The consistency and asymptotic normality of the resulting regression parameter estimator are established and a weighted bootstrap procedure is considered for variance estimation. Simulations show that the proposed method works well for practical situations, and an application to real data is provided.
| S-EPMC5608290 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Epidemiologic studies and disease prevention trials often seek to relate an exposure variable to a failure time that suffers from interval-censoring. When the failure rate is low and the time intervals are wide, a large cohort is often required so as to yield reliable precision on the exposure-failure-time relationship. However, large cohort studies with simple random sampling could be prohibitive for investigators with a limited budget, especially when the exposure variables are expensive to obtain. Alternative cost-effective sampling designs and inference procedures are therefore desirable. We propose an outcome-dependent sampling (ODS) design with interval-censored failure time data, where we enrich the observed sample by selectively including certain more informative failure subjects. We develop a novel sieve semiparametric maximum empirical likelihood approach for fitting the proportional hazards model to data from the proposed interval-censoring ODS design. This approach employs the empirical likelihood and sieve methods to deal with the infinite-dimensional nuisance parameters, which greatly reduces the dimensionality of the estimation problem and eases the computation difficulty. The consistency and asymptotic normality of the resulting regression parameter estimator are established. The results from our extensive simulation study show that the proposed design and method works well for practical situations and is more efficient than the alternative designs and competing approaches. An example from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study is provided for illustration.
| S-EPMC5797528 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Motivated by medical studies in which patients could be cured of disease but the disease event time may be subject to interval censoring, we presents a semiparametric non-mixture cure model for the regression analysis of interval-censored time-to-event datxa. We develop semiparametric maximum likelihood estimation for the model using the expectation-maximization method for interval-censored data. The maximization step for the baseline function is nonparametric and numerically challenging. We develop an efficient and numerically stable algorithm via modern convex optimization techniques, yielding a self-consistency algorithm for the maximization step. We prove the strong consistency of the maximum likelihood estimators under the Hellinger distance, which is an appropriate metric for the asymptotic property of the estimators for interval-censored data. We assess the performance of the estimators in a simulation study with small to moderate sample sizes. To illustrate the method, we also analyze a real data set from a medical study for the biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer among patients who have undergone radical prostatectomy. Supplemental materials for the computational algorithm are available online.
| S-EPMC2846840 | biostudies-literature
Project description:In prevalent cohort design, subjects who have experienced an initial event but not the failure event are preferentially enrolled and the observed failure times are often length-biased. Moreover, the prospective follow-up may not be continuously monitored and failure times are subject to interval censoring. We study the nonparametric maximum likelihood estimation for the proportional hazards model with length-biased interval-censored data. Direct maximization of likelihood function is intractable, thus we develop a computationally simple and stable expectation-maximization algorithm through introducing two layers of data augmentation. We establish the strong consistency, asymptotic normality and efficiency of the proposed estimator and provide an inferential procedure through profile likelihood. We assess the performance of the proposed methods through extensive simulations and apply the proposed methods to the Massachusetts Health Care Panel Study.
| S-EPMC8614128 | biostudies-literature