Dataset Information

Surgery is an option in evolving myocardial infarction induced by spontaneous coronary artery dissection: a case report.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) has emerged as one of the important yet rare causes of acute coronary syndrome that primarily affect young peripartum women without cardiovascular risk factors. Despite the recent improvements in diagnosis and recognition of the importance of SCAD, it remains poorly studied and there has been no consensus of opinion regarding its optimal management.

Case summary

A 29-year-old breastfeeding woman presented with 1-day history of severe chest pain radiating to the jaw and both shoulders. Cardiovascular examination, 12 leads electrocardiogram, and echocardiography were normal. Troponin levels were elevated; hence, coronary angiogram was done and showed type 2 SCAD of the left anterior descending artery (LAD). The patient was managed conservatively. The next day, she started again to complain of severe chest pain and her troponin levels continued to rise. Repeated coronary angiogram revealed progression of the previous LAD dissection. Another dissection was also noticed in the left circumflex artery. Chest pain recurred over the night and her troponin levels continued to rise. An emergency coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) was performed. The patient was doing well postoperatively and was discharged home on Day 8.

Discussion

Our patient presented with acute ischaemic changes secondary to SCAD. The report illustrates the risk factors, pathogenesis, diagnostic work up, and the possible therapeutic options of SCAD, which include conservative management and CABG. The management varies depending on the clinical presentation and the extent of the coronary artery dissection.

SUBMITTER: Al Mahruqi G

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7809722 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundData on health status outcomes after spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) are limited.Methods and findingsUsing the Variation in Recovery: Role of Gender on Outcomes of Young AMI Patients (VIRGO) study we compared patients with SCAD and other acute myocardial infarction (AMI) at presentation (baseline), 1-month, and-12 months using standardized health status instruments. Among 3572 AMI patients ≤ 55 years, 67 had SCAD. SCAD patients were younger (median age (IQR) 45 (40.5-51) years vs. 48 (44-52) in other AMI, p = 0.003), more often female (92.5% vs. 66.6%), have college education (73.1% vs. 51.7%) and household income >$100,000 (43.3% vs. 17.7% (All p<0.001). SCAD patients at baseline had higher mean ± SD Short Form-12 [SF-12] physical component scores [PCS] (48.7±10.2 vs. 43.8±12.1, p<0.001) and mental component scores [MCS] (49.6±12.4 vs. 45.4±12.5, p = 0.008), and at 12-months [PCS (50.1±9.0 vs. 44.3±12.3, p<0.001) and MCS (53±10.1 vs 50.2±11.0, p = 0.045)]. The Euro-Quality of Life Scale [EQ-5D] VAS and EQ-5D index scores were similar at baseline, but higher at 12-months for SCAD (EQ-5D VAS: 82.2±10.2 vs. 72.3±21.0, p<0.001; EQ-5D index scores; 90.2±15.3 vs. 83.7±19.8, p = 0.012). SCAD patients had better baseline Seattle Angina Questionnaire [SAQ] physical limitation (88.8±20.1 vs. 81.2±25.4, p = 0.017). At 12-months SCAD patients had better physical limitation (98.0±8.5 vs. 91.4±18.8, p = 0.007), angina frequency (96.4±8.8 vs. 91.3±16.8, p = 0.018) and quality of life scores (80.7±14.7 vs 72.2±23.2, p = 0.005). Magnitude of change in health status from baseline to 12-months was not statistically different between the groups. After adjustment for time and comorbidities there remained no difference in most health status outcomes.ConclusionsSCAD patients fare marginally better than other AMI patients on most health status instruments and have similar 12-month health status recovery. Better pre-event health status suggests a need to modify exercise prescriptions and cardiac rehabilitation protocols to better assist this physically active population to recover.