Dataset Information

Early experience with COVID-19 patients in a private tertiary hospital in the Philippines: Implications on surge capacity, healthcare systems response, and clinical care.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Our healthcare institution was one of the first to see SARS CoV-2 cases in the country. We describe the early COVID-19 experience of a private hospital in the Philippines and discuss the healthcare system response in the setting of surge capacity.

Methods

We reviewed the medical records of adult COVID-19 hospitalized patients admitted in March 2020. We reported their demographic and clinical characteristics using descriptive statistics.

Results

Of 40 patients admitted, 23 (57.5%) were male and 19 (47.5%) were aged <60 years. Most (n = 27, 67.5%) had moderate-risk, 9 (22.5%) had high-risk, and 4 (10%) had low-risk COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 testing took 5.5 (range 1-10) days. Overall mortality rate was 6/40 (15.0%). Clinical cure was documented in all low-risk patients, 25 (92.6%) moderate-risk patients, and only 1 (11.1%) high-risk patient. In response to the surge, the hospital rapidly introduced one-way traffic systems, dedicated screening, triage and Emergency Department areas for COVID-19, a clinical pathway, engineering controls, patient cohorting, and strict infection prevention and control measures.

Conclusion

Majority of patients recovered from COVID-19. Older age and high-risk pneumonia were associated with poor outcomes. Adaptations to hospital structure and staff were quickly made in response to surge capacity, although our response was hampered by prolonged time to COVID-19 confirmation. Our study underscores the urgent need for rapid adaptive response by the healthcare system to address the surge of cases.

SUBMITTER: Abad CL

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7813488 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background:Hospital antimicrobial stewardship programs are especially critical in countries such as the Philippines, where antibiotic resistant infections are highly prevalent. At the study institution in Manila, Philippines, a Prior Approval for Restricted Antimicrobials (PARA) is required for non-infectious disease specialists to prescribe certain antimicrobials, including carbapenems. PARA request forms include specification of empiric or definitive therapy based on diagnostic tests. Recommended duration of therapy is typically 3 days for empiric use and 7 days for definitive, with possible extension upon specialist approval. Methods:The study took place at an 800-bed tertiary hospital. We performed a retrospective review of patient medical records and laboratory reports dating from January 1 to December 31, 2016. Information related to patient demographics, carbapenem prescription, laboratory diagnosis, and therapy were compiled. Carbapenem prescriptions were classified as 'adherent' or 'non-adherent' according to clinical guidelines related to infection diagnosis, treatment duration, and de-escalation. Results:Of the 185 patients on carbapenem therapy, Prescriptions of carbapenems were either definitive (n = 56), empiric (n = 127), or prophylactic (n = 2) as defined by the ordering provider. 69 out of 185 (37%) prescriptions were deemed non-adherent to guidelines, despite receiving approvals for their respective requests. Of these, 72% were non-adherent due to failure to de-escalate the carbapenem and 28% were non-adherent due to an incomplete course of therapy. Conclusion:Despite initial PARA approval for carbapenem therapy, 37% of prescriptions were non-guideline-adherent, highlighting the ongoing challenges in implementing this type of stewardship strategy. In order to increase the effectiveness of PARA, additional approaches may be warranted, including the application of strict policies which reinforce follow-up of available culture results, justification of therapy extension, or referral to an infectious disease specialist.