Dataset Information

A Decision-Making Supporting Prediction Method for Breast Cancer Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

ABSTRACT: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) may increase the resection rate of breast cancer and shows promising effects on patient prognosis. It has become a necessary treatment choice and is widely used in the clinical setting. Benefitting from the clinical information obtained during NAC treatment, computational methods can improve decision-making by evaluating and predicting treatment responses using a multidisciplinary approach, as there are no uniformly accepted protocols for all institutions for adopting different treatment regiments. In this study, 166 Chinese breast cancer cases were collected from patients who received NAC treatment at the First Bethune Hospital of Jilin University. The Miller-Payne grading system was used to evaluate the treatment response. Four machine learning multiple classifiers were constructed to predict the treatment response against the 26 features extracted from the patients' clinical data, including Random Forest (RF) model, Convolution Neural Network (CNN) model, Support Vector Machine (SVM) model, and Logistic Regression (LR) model, where the RF model achieved the best performance using our data. To allow a more general application, the models were reconstructed using only six selected features, and the RF model achieved the highest performance with 54.26% accuracy. This work can efficiently guide optimal treatment planning for breast cancer patients.

SUBMITTER: Song D

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7813988 | biostudies-literature | 2020

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A Decision-Making Supporting Prediction Method for Breast Cancer Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Song Dong D Man Xiaxia X Jin Meng M Li Qian Q Wang Han H Du Ye Y

Frontiers in oncology 20210105

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) may increase the resection rate of breast cancer and shows promising effects on patient prognosis. It has become a necessary treatment choice and is widely used in the clinical setting. Benefitting from the clinical information obtained during NAC treatment, computational methods can improve decision-making by evaluating and predicting treatment responses using a multidisciplinary approach, as there are no uniformly accepted protocols for all institutions for adopt ...[more]

PMID: 33469514

Similar Datasets

Project description:Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is characterized by earlier recurrence and shorter survival compared with other types of breast cancer. Moreover, approximately 15 to 25% of all TNBC patients harbor germline BRCA (gBRCA) 1/2 mutations, which confer a more aggressive phenotype. However, TNBC seems to be particularly sensitive to chemotherapy, the so-called 'triple negative paradox'. Therefore, Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is currently considered the preferred approach for early-stage TNBC. BRCA status has also been studied as a predictive biomarker of response to platinum compounds. Although several randomized trials investigated the addition of carboplatin to standard NACT in early-stage TNBC, the role of BRCA status remains unclear. In this retrospective analysis, we evaluated data from 136 consecutive patients with Stage I-III TNBC who received standard NACT with or without the addition of carboplatin, in order to define clinical features and outcomes in BRCA 1/2 mutation carriers and non-carrier controls. Between January 2013 and February 2021, 67 (51.3%) out of 136 patients received a standard anthracyclines/taxane regimen and 69 (50.7%) patients received a platinum-containing chemotherapy regimen. Deleterious germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations were identified in 39 (28.7%) patients. Overall, patients with deleterious gBRCA1/2 mutation have significantly higher pCR rate than non-carrier patients (23 [59%] of 39 vs. 33 [34%] of 97; p = 0.008). The benefit of harboring a gBRCA mutation was confirmed only in the subset of patients who received a platinum-based NACT (17 [65.4%] of 26 vs. 13 [30.2%] of 43; p = 0.005) while no differences were found in the platinum-free subgroup. Patients who achieved pCR after NACT had significantly better EFS (OR 4.5; 95% CI 1.9-10.7; p = 0.001) and OS (OR 3.3; 95% CI 1.3-8.9; p = 0.01) than patients who did not, regardless of BRCA1/2 mutation status and type of NACT received. Our results based on real-world evidence show that TNBC patients with the gBRCA1/2 mutation who received platinum-based NACT have a higher pCR rate than non-carrier patients, supporting the use of this chemotherapy regimen in this patient population. Long-term follow-up analyses are needed to further define the role of gBRCA mutation status on clinical outcomes in patients with early-TNBC.

Project description:Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is increasingly being used to preoperatively shrink breast tumours prior to surgery. This approach also provides the opportunity to study the molecular changes associated with treatment and evaluate whether on-treatment sequential samples can improve response and outcome predictions over diagnostic or excision samples alone. Methods: A total of 95 samples from a cohort of 50 neoadjuvant chemotherapy-treated primary breast cancer patients (aged 29-76, 48% ER+, 20% HER2+) enrolled in the NEO trial taken before, at 2 weeks on-treatment, mid-therapy and at resection were sequenced with Ion Ampliseq transcriptome yielding expression values for 12,635 genes. Differential expression analysis was performed across 16 responders and 34 non-responders defined by pathological complete response and over treatment time to identify significantly differentially expressed genes, pathways and markers indicative of response status. Prediction accuracy was compared with estimations of established gene signatures, for this dataset and validated using data from the I-SPY1 trial. Results: AAGAB was identified as a novel on-treatment biomarker for pathological complete response, with an accuracy of 100% in the NEO training dataset and 78% accuracy in the I-SPY1 Trial. AAGAB levels on treatment were also significantly predictive of term survival (p = 0.048, p = 0.031) in the two cohorts. This single gene on-treatment biomarker, had greater predictive accuracy than established prognostic tests, Mammaprint and Pam50 risk of recurrence score, although interesting both of these tests performed better in the on-treatment rather than the accepted pre-treatment setting (accuracy improving consistently by 2-8%). Conclusion: Changes in gene expression measured in sequential samples from breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy resulted in the identification of a novel on-treatment biomarker and suggest that established prognostic tests may have greater prediction accuracy on- than before treatment. These results support the potential use and further evaluation of on- treatment testing in breast cancer to improve the accuracy of tumour response prediction.

Project description:BackgroundNeoadjuvant chemotherapy is increasingly given preoperatively to shrink breast tumours prior to surgery. This approach also provides the opportunity to study the molecular changes associated with treatment and evaluate whether on-treatment sequential samples can improve response and outcome predictions over diagnostic or excision samples alone.MethodsThis study included a total of 97 samples from a cohort of 50 women (aged 29-76, with 46% ER+ and 20% HER2+ tumours) with primary operable breast cancer who had been treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Biopsies were taken at diagnosis, at 2 weeks on-treatment, mid-chemotherapy, and at resection. Fresh frozen samples were sequenced with Ion AmpliSeq Transcriptome yielding expression values for 12,635 genes. Differential expression analysis was performed across 16 patients with a complete pathological response (pCR) and 34 non-pCR patients, and over treatment time to identify significantly differentially expressed genes, pathways, and markers indicative of response status. Prediction accuracy was compared with estimations of established gene signatures, for this dataset and validated using data from the I-SPY 1 Trial.ResultsAlthough changes upon treatment are largely similar between the two cohorts, very few genes were found to be consistently different between responders and non-responders, making the prediction of response difficult. AAGAB was identified as a novel potential on-treatment biomarker for pathological complete response, with an accuracy of 100% in the NEO training dataset and 78% accuracy in the I-SPY 1 testing dataset. AAGAB levels on-treatment were also significantly predictive of outcome (p = 0.048, p = 0.0036) in both cohorts. This single gene on-treatment biomarker had greater predictive accuracy than established prognostic tests, Mammaprint and PAM50 risk of recurrence score, although interestingly, both of these latter tests performed better in the on-treatment rather than the accepted pre-treatment setting.ConclusionChanges in gene expression measured in sequential samples from breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy resulted in the identification of a potentially novel on-treatment biomarker and suggest that established prognostic tests may have greater prediction accuracy on than before treatment. These results support the potential use and further evaluation of on-treatment testing in breast cancer to improve the accuracy of tumour response prediction.

Dataset Information

A Decision-Making Supporting Prediction Method for Breast Cancer Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Publications

A Decision-Making Supporting Prediction Method for Breast Cancer Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets