Dataset Information

Trends in biosensing platforms for SARS-CoV-2 detection: A critical appraisal against standard detection tools.

ABSTRACT: In this ongoing theme of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, highly sensitive analytical testing platforms are extremely necessary to detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA and antiviral antibodies. To limit the viral spread, prompt and precise diagnosis is crucial to facilitate treatment and ensure effective isolation. Accurate detection of antibodies (IgG and IgM) is imperative to understand the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in public and to inspect the proportion of immune individuals. In this review, we demonstrate and evaluate some tests that have been used commonly to detect SARS-CoV-2. These include nucleic acid and serological tests for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA and specific antibodies in infected people. Moreover, the vitality of biosensing technologies emphasizing on optical and electrochemical biosensors toward the detection of SARS-CoV-2 has also been discussed here. The early diagnosis of COVID-19 based on detection of reactive oxygen species overproduction because of virus-induced dysfunctioning of lung cells has also been highlighted.

SUBMITTER: Aziz A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7817481 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Monitoring the human immune response by assaying (detection and quantification) the antibody level against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is important in conducting epidemiological surveillance and immunization studies at a population level. Herein, we present the design and fabrication of a solid-state nanoplasmonic biosensing platform that is capable of quantifying SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody IgG with a limit of detection as low as 30.0 attomolar (aM) and a wide dynamic range spanning seven orders of magnitude. Based on IgG binding constant determination for different biological motifs, we show that the covalent attachment of highly specific SARS-CoV-2 linear epitopes with an appropriate ratio, in contrast to using SARS-CoV-2 spike protein subunits as receptor molecules, to gold triangular nanoprisms (Au TNPs) results in a construction of a highly selective and more sensitive, label-free IgG biosensor. The biosensing platform displays specificity against other human antibodies and no cross reactivity against MERS-CoV antibodies. Furthermore, the nanoplasmonic biosensing platform can be assembled in a multi-well plate format to translate to a high-throughput assay that allowed us to conduct SARS-CoV-2 IgG assays of COVID-19 positive patient (n = 121) and healthy individual (n = 65) plasma samples. Most importantly, performing a blind test in an additional cohort of 30 patient plasma samples, our nanoplasmonic biosensing platform successfully identified COVID-19 positive samples with 90% specificity and 100% sensitivity. Very recent studies show that our selected epitopes are conserved in the highly mutated SARS-CoV-2 variant "Omicron"; therefore, the demonstrated high-throughput nanoplasmonic biosensing platform holds great promise for a highly specific serological assay for conducting large-scale COVID-19 testing and epidemiological studies and monitoring the immune response and durability of immunity as part of the global immunization programs.

Project description:BackgroundConsumers of research (researchers, administrators, educators and clinicians) frequently use standard critical appraisal tools to evaluate the quality of published research reports. However, there is no consensus regarding the most appropriate critical appraisal tool for allied health research. We summarized the content, intent, construction and psychometric properties of published, currently available critical appraisal tools to identify common elements and their relevance to allied health research.MethodsA systematic review was undertaken of 121 published critical appraisal tools sourced from 108 papers located on electronic databases and the Internet. The tools were classified according to the study design for which they were intended. Their items were then classified into one of 12 criteria based on their intent. Commonly occurring items were identified. The empirical basis for construction of the tool, the method by which overall quality of the study was established, the psychometric properties of the critical appraisal tools and whether guidelines were provided for their use were also recorded.ResultsEighty-seven percent of critical appraisal tools were specific to a research design, with most tools having been developed for experimental studies. There was considerable variability in items contained in the critical appraisal tools. Twelve percent of available tools were developed using specified empirical research. Forty-nine percent of the critical appraisal tools summarized the quality appraisal into a numeric summary score. Few critical appraisal tools had documented evidence of validity of their items, or reliability of use. Guidelines regarding administration of the tools were provided in 43% of cases.ConclusionsThere was considerable variability in intent, components, construction and psychometric properties of published critical appraisal tools for research reports. There is no "gold standard' critical appraisal tool for any study design, nor is there any widely accepted generic tool that can be applied equally well across study types. No tool was specific to allied health research requirements. Thus interpretation of critical appraisal of research reports currently needs to be considered in light of the properties and intent of the critical appraisal tool chosen for the task.

Dataset Information

Trends in biosensing platforms for SARS-CoV-2 detection: A critical appraisal against standard detection tools.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets