230 days of ultra long-term subcutaneous EEG: seizure cycle analysis and comparison to patient diary.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Viana PF
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7818131 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Jan
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
230 days of ultra long-term subcutaneous EEG: seizure cycle analysis and comparison to patient diary.
Viana Pedro F PF Duun-Henriksen Jonas J Glasstëter Martin M Dümpelmann Matthias M Nurse Ewan S ES Martins Isabel P IP Dumanis Sonya B SB Schulze-Bonhage Andreas A Freestone Dean R DR Brinkmann Benjamin H BH Richardson Mark P MP
Annals of clinical and translational neurology 20201204 1
We describe the longest period of subcutaneous EEG (sqEEG) monitoring to date, in a 35-year-old female with refractory epilepsy. Over 230 days, 4791/5520 h of sqEEG were recorded (86%, mean 20.8 [IQR 3.9] hours/day). Using an electronic diary, the patient reported 22 seizures, while automatically-assisted visual sqEEG review detected 32 seizures. There was substantial agreement between days of reported and recorded seizures (Cohen's kappa 0.664), although multiple clustered seizures remained und ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:ObjectiveTo explore the feasibility of home monitoring of epilepsy patients with a novel subcutaneous electroencephalography (EEG) device, including clinical implications, safety, and compliance via the first real-life test.MethodsWe implanted a beta-version of the 24/7 EEG SubQ (UNEEG Medical A/S, Denmark) subcutaneously in nine participants with temporal lobe epilepsy. Data on seizures, adverse events, compliance in using the device, and use of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were collected. EEG was recorded for up to 3 months, and all EEG data were reviewed visually to identify electrographic seizures. These were descriptively compared to seizure counts and AED changes reported in diaries from the same period.ResultsFour hundred ninety days of EEG and 338 electrographic seizures were collected. Eight participants completed at least 9 weeks of home monitoring, while one cancelled participation after 4 weeks due to postimplantation soreness. In total, 13 cases of device-related adverse events were registered, none of them serious. Recordings obtained from the device covered 73% of the time, on average (range 45%-91%). Descriptively, electrographic seizure counts were substantially different from diary seizure counts. We uncovered several cases of underreporting and revealed important information on AED response. Electrographic seizure counts revealed circadian distributions of seizures not visible from seizure diaries.SignificanceThe study shows that home monitoring for up to 3 months with a subcutaneous EEG device is feasible and well tolerated. No serious adverse device-related events were reported. An objective seizure count can be derived, which often differs substantially from self-reported seizure counts. Larger clinical trials quantifying the benefits of objective seizure counting should be a priority for future research as well as development of algorithms for automated review of data.
| S-EPMC6899579 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background: Epileptic seizures are caused by abnormal brain wave hypersynchronization leading to a range of signs and symptoms. Tools for detecting seizures in everyday life typically focus on cardiac rhythm, electrodermal activity, or movement (EMG, accelerometry); however, these modalities are not very effective for non-motor seizures. Ultra long-term subcutaneous EEG-devices can detect the electrographic changes that do not depend on clinical changes. Nonetheless, this also means that it is not possible to assess whether a seizure is clinical or subclinical based on an EEG signal alone. Therefore, we combine EEG and movement-related modalities in this work. We focus on whether it is possible to define an individual "multimodal ictal fingerprint" which can be exploited in different epilepsy management purposes. Methods: This study used ultra long-term data from an outpatient monitoring trial of persons with temporal lobe epilepsy obtained with a subcutaneous EEG recording system. Subcutaneous EEG, an EMG estimate and chest-mounted accelerometry were extracted from four persons showing more than 10 well-defined electrographic seizures each. Numerous features were computed from all three modalities. Based on these, the Gini impurity measure of a Random Forest classifier was used to select the most discriminative features for the ictal fingerprint. A total of 74 electrographic seizures were analyzed. Results: The optimal individual ictal fingerprints included features extracted from all three tested modalities: an acceleration component; the power of the estimated EMG activity; and the relative power in the delta (0.5-4 Hz), low theta (4-6 Hz), and high theta (6-8 Hz) bands of the subcutaneous EEG. Multimodal ictal fingerprints were established for all persons, clustering seizures within persons, while separating seizures across persons. Conclusion: The existence of multimodal ictal fingerprints illustrates the benefits of combining multiple modalities such as EEG, EMG, and accelerometry in future epilepsy management. Multimodal ictal fingerprints could be used by doctors to get a better understanding of the individual seizure semiology of people with epilepsy. Furthermore, the multimodal ictal fingerprint gives a better understanding of how seizures manifest simultaneously in different modalities. A knowledge that could be used to improve seizure acknowledgment when reviewing EEG without video.
| S-EPMC8733463 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Accurate seizure prediction will transform epilepsy management by offering warnings to patients or triggering interventions. However, state-of-the-art algorithm design relies on accessing adequate long-term data. Crowd-sourcing ecosystems leverage quality data to enable cost-effective, rapid development of predictive algorithms. A crowd-sourcing ecosystem for seizure prediction is presented involving an international competition, a follow-up held-out data evaluation, and an online platform, Epilepsyecosystem.org, for yielding further improvements in prediction performance. Crowd-sourced algorithms were obtained via the 'Melbourne-University AES-MathWorks-NIH Seizure Prediction Challenge' conducted at kaggle.com. Long-term continuous intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) data (442 days of recordings and 211 lead seizures per patient) from prediction-resistant patients who had the lowest seizure prediction performances from the NeuroVista Seizure Advisory System clinical trial were analysed. Contestants (646 individuals in 478 teams) from around the world developed algorithms to distinguish between 10-min inter-seizure versus pre-seizure data clips. Over 10 000 algorithms were submitted. The top algorithms as determined by using the contest data were evaluated on a much larger held-out dataset. The data and top algorithms are available online for further investigation and development. The top performing contest entry scored 0.81 area under the classification curve. The performance reduced by only 6.7% on held-out data. Many other teams also showed high prediction reproducibility. Pseudo-prospective evaluation demonstrated that many algorithms, when used alone or weighted by circadian information, performed better than the benchmarks, including an average increase in sensitivity of 1.9 times the original clinical trial sensitivity for matched time in warning. These results indicate that clinically-relevant seizure prediction is possible in a wider range of patients than previously thought possible. Moreover, different algorithms performed best for different patients, supporting the use of patient-specific algorithms and long-term monitoring. The crowd-sourcing ecosystem for seizure prediction will enable further worldwide community study of the data to yield greater improvements in prediction performance by way of competition, collaboration and synergism.10.1093/brain/awy210_video1awy210media15817489051001.
| S-EPMC6136083 | biostudies-other
Project description:Entropy measures that assess signals' complexity have drawn increasing attention recently in biomedical field, as they have shown the ability of capturing unique features that are intrinsic and physiologically meaningful. In this study, we applied entropy analysis to electroencephalogram (EEG) data to examine its performance in epilepsy detection based on short-term EEG, aiming at establishing a short-term analysis protocol with optimal seizure detection performance. Two classification problems were considered, i.e., 1) classifying interictal and ictal EEGs (epileptic group) from normal EEGs; and 2) classifying ictal from interictal EEGs. For each problem, we explored two protocols to analyze the entropy of EEG: i) using a single analytical window with different window lengths, and ii) using an average of multiple windows for each window length. Two entropy methods-fuzzy entropy (FuzzyEn) and distribution entropy (DistEn)-were used that have valid outputs for any given data lengths. We performed feature selection and trained classifiers based on a cross-validation process. The results show that performance of FuzzyEn and DistEn may complement each other and the best performance can be achieved by combining: 1) FuzzyEn of one 5-s window and the averaged DistEn of five 1-s windows for classifying normal from epileptic group (accuracy: 0.93, sensitivity: 0.91, specificity: 0.96); and 2) the averaged FuzzyEn of five 1-s windows and DistEn of one 5-s window for classifying ictal from interictal EEGs (accuracy: 0.91, sensitivity: 0.93, specificity: 0.90). Further studies are warranted to examine whether this proposed short-term analysis procedure can help track the epileptic activities in real time and provide prompt feedback for clinical practices.
| S-EPMC5854404 | biostudies-literature
Project description:A subset of patients with epilepsy successfully self-predicted seizures in a paper diary study. We conducted an e-diary study to ensure that prediction precedes seizures, and to characterize the prodromal features and time windows that underlie self-prediction.Subjects 18 or older with localization-related epilepsy (LRE) and ?3 seizures per month maintained an e-diary, reporting a.m./p.m. data daily, including mood, premonitory symptoms, and all seizures. Self-prediction was rated by, "How likely are you to experience a seizure (time frame)?" Five choices ranged from almost certain (>95% chance) to very unlikely. Relative odds of seizure (odds ratio, OR) within time frames was examined using Poisson models with log normal random effects to adjust for multiple observations.Nineteen subjects reported 244 eligible seizures. OR for prediction choices within 6 h was as high as 9.31 (CI 1.92-45.23) for "almost certain." Prediction was most robust within 6 h of diary entry, and remained significant up to 12 h. For nine best predictors, average sensitivity was 50%. Older age contributed to successful self-prediction, and self-prediction appeared to be driven by mood and premonitory symptoms. In multivariate modeling of seizure occurrence, self-prediction (2.84; CI 1.68-4.81), favorable change in mood (0.82; CI 0.67-0.99), and number of premonitory symptoms (1.11; CI 1.00-1.24) were significant.Some persons with epilepsy can self-predict seizures. In these individuals, the odds of a seizure following a positive prediction are high. Predictions were robust, not attributable to recall bias, and were related to self-awareness of mood and premonitory features. The 6-h prediction window is suitable for the development of preemptive therapy.
| S-EPMC3833277 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveRecently, a deep learning AI model forecasted seizure risk using retrospective seizure diaries with higher accuracy than random forecasts. The present study sought to prospectively evaluate the same algorithm.MethodsWe recruited a prospective cohort of 46 people with epilepsy; 25 completed sufficient data entry for analysis (median 5 months). We used the same AI method as in our prior study. Group-level and individual-level Brier Skill Scores (BSS) compared random forecasts and simple moving average forecasts to the AI.ResultsThe AI had an AUC of 0.82. At the group level, the AI outperformed random forecasting (BSS=0.53). At the individual level, AI outperformed random in 28% of cases. At the group and individual level, the moving average outperformed the AI. If pre-enrollment (non-verified) diaries (with presumed under-reporting) were included, the AI significantly outperformed both comparators. Surveys showed most did not mind poor quality LOW-RISK or HIGH-RISK forecasts, yet 91% wanted access to these forecasts.SignificanceThe previously developed AI forecasting tool did not outperform a very simple moving average forecasting this prospective cohort, suggesting that the AI model should be replaced.
| S-EPMC10802655 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background and objectiveEpilepsy is one of the most common neurological disorders, whose development is typically detected via early seizures. Electroencephalogram (EEG) is prevalently employed for seizure identification due to its routine and low expense collection. The stochastic nature of EEG makes manual seizure inspections laborsome, motivating automated seizure identification. The relevant literature focuses mostly on supervised machine learning. Despite their success, supervised methods require expert labels indicating seizure segments, which are difficult to obtain on clinically-acquired EEG. Thus, we aim to devise an unsupervised method for seizure identification on EEG.MethodsWe propose the first fully-unsupervised deep learning method for seizure identification on raw EEG, using a variational autoencoder (VAE). In doing so, we train the VAE on recordings without seizures. As training captures non-seizure activity, we identify seizures with respect to the reconstruction errors at inference time. Moreover, we extend the traditional VAE training loss to suppress EEG artifacts. Our method does not require ground-truth expert labels indicating seizure segments or manual feature extraction.ResultsWe implement our method using the PyTorch library and execute experiments on an NVIDIA V100 GPU. We evaluate our method on three benchmark EEG datasets: (i) intracranial recordings from the University of Pennsylvania and the Mayo Clinic, (ii) scalp recordings from the Temple University Hospital of Philadelphia, and (iii) scalp recordings from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the Boston Children's Hospital. To assess performance, we report accuracy, precision, recall, Area under the Receiver Operating Characteristics Curve (AUC), and p-value under the Welch t-test for distinguishing seizure vs. non-seizure EEG windows. Our approach can successfully distinguish seizures from non-seizure activity, with up to 0.83 AUC on intracranial recordings. Moreover, our algorithm has the potential for real-time inference, by processing at least 10 s of EEG in a second.ConclusionWe take the first successful steps in deep learning-based unsupervised seizure identification on raw EEG. Our approach has the potential of alleviating the burden on clinical experts regarding laborsome EEG inspections for seizures. Furthermore, aiding the identification of early seizures via our method could facilitate successful detection of epilepsy development and initiate antiepileptogenic therapies.
| S-EPMC9849142 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Study objectivesMultiple methods for monitoring sleep-wake activity have identified sleep disturbances as risk factors for Alzheimer disease (AD). In order to identify the level of agreement between different methods, we compared sleep parameters derived from single-channel EEG (scEEG), actigraphy, and sleep diaries in cognitively normal and mildly impaired older adults.MethodsTwo hundred ninety-three participants were monitored at home for up to six nights with scEEG, actigraphy, and sleep diaries. Total sleep time (TST), sleep efficiency (SE), sleep onset latency (SOL), and wake after sleep onset (WASO) were calculated using each of these methods. In 109 of the 293 participants, the ratio of cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of phosphorylated tau (p-tau) and amyloid-β-42 (Aβ42) was used as a biomarker for AD pathology.ResultsAgreement was highest for TST across instruments, especially in cognitively normal older adults. Overall, scEEG and actigraphy appeared to have greater agreement for multiple sleep parameters than for scEEG and diary or actigraphy and diary. Levels of agreement between scEEG and actigraphy overall decreased in mildly impaired participants and those with biomarker evidence of AD pathology, especially for measurements of TST.ConclusionsCaution should be exercised when comparing scEEG and actigraphy in individuals with mild cognitive impairment or with AD pathology. Sleep diaries may capture different aspects of sleep compared to scEEG and actigraphy. Additional studies comparing different methods of measuring sleep-wake activity in older adults are necessary to allow for comparison between studies using different methods.
| S-EPMC7898727 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveLocalization of epileptic seizures, usually characterized by abnormal hypersynchronous wave patterns from the cortex, remains elusive. We present a novel, robust method for automatic localization of seizures on the scalp from clinical electroencephalogram (EEG) data.MethodsSeizure patient EEG data was decomposed via the Hilbert Transform and processed through the following methodology: sorting the analytic amplitude (AA) in the time instance, locating the maximum amplitude within the vector of channels, cross-correlating amplitude values in the time index with the channel vector. The channel with highest AA value in time was located.ResultsOur approach provides an automated way to isolate the epi-genesis of seizure events with 93.3% precision and 100% sensitivity. The method differentiates seizure-related neural activity from other common EEG noise artifacts (e.g., blinks, myogenic noise).ConclusionsWe evaluated performance characteristics of our source location methodology utilizing both phase and energy of EEG signals from patients who exhibited seizure events. Feasibility of the new algorithm is demonstrated and confirmed.SignificanceThe proposed method contributes to high-performance scalp localization for seizure events that is more straightforward and less computationally intensive than other methods (e.g., inverse source modeling). Ultimately, it may aid clinicians in providing improved patient diagnosis.
| S-EPMC7437564 | biostudies-literature
Project description:People with epilepsy frequently under- or inaccurately report their seizures, which poses a challenge for evaluating their treatment. The introduction of epilepsy health apps provides a novel approach that could improve seizure documentation. This study assessed the documentation performance of an app-based seizure diary and a conventional paper seizure diary. At two tertiary epilepsy centers patients were asked to use one of two offered methods to report their seizures (paper or app diary) during their stay in the epilepsy monitoring unit. The performances of both methods were assessed based on the gold standard of video-EEG annotations. In total 89 adults (54 paper and 35 app users) with focal epilepsy were included in the analysis, of which 58 (33 paper and 25 app users) experienced at least one seizure and made at least one seizure diary entry. We observed a high precision of 85.7% for the app group, whereas the paper group's precision was lower due to overreporting (66.9%). Sensitivity was similar for both methods. Our findings imply that performance of seizure self-reporting is patient-dependent but is more precise for patients who are willing to use digital apps. This may be relevant for treatment decisions and future clinical trial design.
| S-EPMC11233562 | biostudies-literature