Dataset Information

Risk assessment in precapillary pulmonary hypertension: a comparative analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Risk stratification is essential to assess mortality risk and guide treatment in patients with precapillary pulmonary hypertension (PH). We herein compared the accuracy of different currently used PH risk stratification tools and evaluated the significance of particular risk parameters.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective longitudinal observational cohort study evaluating seven different risk assessment approaches according to the current PH guidelines. A comprehensive assessment including multi-parametric risk stratification was performed at baseline and 4 yearly follow-up time-points. Multi-step Cox hazard analysis was used to analyse and refine risk prediction.

Results

Various available risk models effectively predicted mortality in patients with precapillary pulmonary hypertension. Right-heart catheter parameters were not essential for risk prediction. Contrary, non-invasive follow-up re-evaluations significantly improved the accuracy of risk estimations. A lack of accuracy of various risk models was found in the intermediate- and high-risk classes. For these patients, an additional evaluation step including assessment of age and right atrium area improved risk prediction significantly.

Discussion

Currently used abbreviated versions of the ESC/ERS risk assessment tool, as well as the REVEAL 2.0 and REVEAL Lite 2 based risk stratification, lack accuracy to predict mortality in intermediate- and high-risk precapillary pulmonary hypertension patients. An expanded non-invasive evaluation improves mortality risk prediction in these individuals.

SUBMITTER: Sonnweber T

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7818775 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Risk assessment in precapillary pulmonary hypertension: a comparative analysis.

Sonnweber Thomas T Schneider Eva-Maria EM Nairz Manfred M Theurl Igor I Weiss Günter G Tymoszuk Piotr P Löffler-Ragg Judith J

Respiratory research 20210121 1

<h4>Background</h4>Risk stratification is essential to assess mortality risk and guide treatment in patients with precapillary pulmonary hypertension (PH). We herein compared the accuracy of different currently used PH risk stratification tools and evaluated the significance of particular risk parameters.<h4>Methods</h4>We conducted a retrospective longitudinal observational cohort study evaluating seven different risk assessment approaches according to the current PH guidelines. A comprehensive ...[more]

PMID: 33478493

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAlthough pulmonary vascular bed has been the main subject of research for many years in pulmonary hypertension (PH), interest has recently started to divert towards the possibility of a co-existing peripheral microangiopathy. The aim of the current study was to investigate the presence of nailfold video-capillaroscopic (NVC) structural changes in patients with precapillary PH and to identify possible associations of NVC measurements with markers of disease severity.Methods? prospective case-control study was performed in 28 consecutive patients with precapillary PH [14 with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH) and 14 with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH)] and 30 healthy controls. NVC quantitative and qualitative parameters were evaluated using Optilia Digital Capillaroscope. To ensure inter-observer repeatability capillaroscopic images were reviewed by two independent investigators. For multiple comparisons among continuous variables, one-way ANOVA or the Kruskal-Wallis test were used. Differences between the groups were tested with post-hoc analysis with adjustment for multiple comparisons (Bonferroni test).ResultsBoth IPAH (71.4% were women, mean age 53.1?±?13.4 years) and CTEPH (64.3% women, mean age 60.9?±?14.4 years) groups presented reduced capillary density compared to healthy controls (8.4?±?1.2 loops/mm and 8.0?±?1.2 loops/mm vs. 9.7?±?0.81 loops/mm, p?<?0.001) and increased loop width (15.7?±?3.9 ?m and 15.8?±?1.9 ?m vs. 11.5?±?2.3 ?m, p?<?0.001). More than half of patients with IPAH presented microhaemorrhages on capillary nailfold, while increased shape abnormalities in capillary morphology and more capillary thrombi per linear mm were detected in patients with CTEPH compared to patients with IPAH and healthy controls. All PH patients presented a non-specific NVC pattern compared to controls (p?<?0.001).ConclusionThe findings of the study reveal a degree of significant peripheral microvascular alterations in patients with IPAH and CTEPH, suggesting a generalized impairment of peripheral microvasculature in pulmonary vascular disease.

Dataset Information

Risk assessment in precapillary pulmonary hypertension: a comparative analysis.

Background

Methods

Results

Discussion

Publications

Risk assessment in precapillary pulmonary hypertension: a comparative analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets