Dataset Information

Accelerometric Assessment of Postural Balance in Children: A Systematic Review.

ABSTRACT: The correct development of postural control in children is fundamental to ensure that they fully reach their psychomotor capacities. However, this capacity is one of the least studied in the clinical and academic scope regarding children. The objective of this study was to analyze the degree of implementation of accelerometry as an evaluation technique for postural control in children and how it is being used.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, SpringerLink, SportsDiscus, Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science with the following terms: balance, postural control, children, kids, accelerometry, and accelerometer.

Results

The search generated a total of 18 articles. Two groups of studies were differentiated: those which exclusively included healthy individuals (n = 5) and those which included children with pathologies (n = 13). Accelerometry is being used in children mainly to assess the gait and static balance, as well as to identify the differences between healthy children and children with developmental disorders.

Conclusions

Accelerometry has a discrete degree of implementation as an evaluation tool to assess postural control. It is necessary to define a systematic method for the evaluation of postural control in pediatrics, in order to delve into the development of this capacity and its alterations in different neurodevelopmental disorders.

SUBMITTER: Garcia-Soidan JL

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7822105 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Accelerometric Assessment of Postural Balance in Children: A Systematic Review.

García-Soidán Jose L JL Leirós-Rodríguez Raquel R Romo-Pérez Vicente V García-Liñeira Jesús J

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) 20201222 1

The correct development of postural control in children is fundamental to ensure that they fully reach their psychomotor capacities. However, this capacity is one of the least studied in the clinical and academic scope regarding children. The objective of this study was to analyze the degree of implementation of accelerometry as an evaluation technique for postural control in children and how it is being used.<h4>Methods</h4>A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, SpringerLink, SportsDiscus ...[more]

PMID: 33375206

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveTo conduct a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of active video game (AVG) interventions on postural balance across all ages in populations with and without neurologic impairments, using all types of platforms.Data sourceSix databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, Sport Discus, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar) were reviewed by December 31, 2020.Study selectionThe protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO: CRD42020204191). For inclusion, a study must be original, published in English peer-reviewed venues and employed AVGs as the sole or primary intervention to enhance, maintain, or regain postural balance. At least 2 within- or between-subjects conditions must be included with ≥10 participants per condition.Data extractionThree reviewers independently performed data extraction and assessed the risk of bias.Data synthesis129 studies were identified, with 102 eligible for meta-analysis. The total number of tested participants was 6407 (60.0% women, Mage=55.1 years, range=3-99 years, SD=22.6). The average intervention duration was 35.6 min/session with 3.1 sessions/week for 7.6 weeks. The overall effect favored AVG interventions (Hedges' g=0.469; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.407-0.531). Although the overall study quality was relatively low, the analysis expectedly indicated significantly larger effects (P<.001) for AVG-interventions over passive controls (Hedges' g=0.627; 95% CI=0.466-0.788), but importantly also favored AVG-interventions over conventional treatment (Hedges' g=0.389; 95% CI=0.311-0.468). All clinical populations responded positively, although with different effect sizes (P=.023). Children experienced larger treatment effects (Hedges' g=0.550; 95% CI=0.336-0.764), closely followed by seniors (Hedges' g=0.529; 95% CI=0.402-0.656). The largest intervention effect on balance improvements was seen in healthy people without a medical condition (Hedges' g=0.609; 95% CI=0.465-0.753).ConclusionsAVGs can produce postural balance improvements and better postural maintenance. All populations could benefit from AVG interventions.

Project description:BackgroundBalance challenges are associated with not only the aging process but also a wide variety of psychiatric and neurological disorders. However, relatively little is known regarding the neural basis of balance and the effects of balance interventions on the brain.Research questionThis review synthesizes the existing literature to answer the question: What are the key brain structures associated with balance?MethodsThis review examined 37 studies that assessed brain structures in relation to balance assessment or intervention. These studies provided 234 findings implicating 71 brain structures. The frequency of implication for each structure was examined based upon specific methodological parameters, including study design (assessment/intervention), type of balance measured (static/dynamic), population (clinical/non-clinical), and imaging analysis technique (region of interest [ROI]/voxel-based morphometry [VBM]).ResultsAlthough a number of structures were associated with balance across the brain, the most frequently implicated structures included the cerebellum, basal ganglia, thalamus, hippocampus, inferior parietal cortex, and frontal lobe regions. Findings in the cerebellum and brainstem were most common in studies with clinical populations, studies that used an ROI approach, and studies that measured dynamic balance. Findings in the frontal, occipital, and parietal regions were also more common in studies that measured dynamic compared to static balance.SignificanceWhile balance appears to be a whole-brain phenomenon, a subset of structures appear to play a key role in balance and are likely implicated in balance disorders. Some of these structures (i.e., the cerebellum, basal ganglia and thalamus) have a well-appreciated role in balance, whereas other regions (i.e., hippocampus and inferior parietal cortex) are not commonly thought to be associated with balance and therefore may provide alternative explanations for the neural basis of balance. Key avenues for future research include understanding the roles of all regions involved in balance across the lifespan and in different clinical populations.

Project description:BackgroundVision plays an important role in controlling posture and balance in children. Reduced postural control has been reported in children with strabismus, but little has been reported specifically in amblyopia.ObjectiveTo investigate whether children with amblyopia have reduced balance compared to both children with strabismus without amblyopia and healthy controls.Study design and methodsIn this cross-sectional study, a total of 56 patients and healthy controls were recruited from the Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology Clinics at The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto. Participants were divided into three groups: (1) 18 with unilateral amblyopia (strabismic amblyopia or mixed mechanism); (2) 16 with strabismus only without amblyopia; and (3) 22 visually-normal controls. The primary outcome was the balance performance as measured by the balance subtest of the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency 2 [BOT2].ResultsThe age and gender-adjusted BOT2 balance scores were significantly reduced in the amblyopia group (mean score 9.0 ± 3.1 SD) and the strabismus without amblyopia group (mean score 8.6 ± 2.4 SD) compared to visually normal controls (mean score 18.9 ± 4.2) (p<0.0001), but no statistical difference was demonstrated between the two patient groups (p = 0.907). Further subgroup analysis of the strabismus only group did not reveal a statistically significant difference in performance on BOT2 balance score between strabismus only patients with good stereopsis 60 sec or better (BOT2 mean score 9.8±3.0 SD) to patients with 3000 sec or no stereopsis (BOT2 mean score 7.9±1.7) (p = 0.144).ConclusionOur findings suggest that normal vision plays an important role in the development and maintenance of balance control. When normal binocular vision is disrupted in childhood in strabismus and/or amblyopia, not only is the vision affected, but balance is also reduced. Our results indicate that the presence of even mild binocular discordance/dysfunction (patients with intermittent strabismus and good stereopsis) may lead to postural instability.

Dataset Information

Accelerometric Assessment of Postural Balance in Children: A Systematic Review.

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Accelerometric Assessment of Postural Balance in Children: A Systematic Review.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets