Dataset Information

Malignancy in giant cell tumor of bone: analysis of an open-label phase 2 study of denosumab.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a rare osteoclastogenic stromal tumor. GCTB can rarely undergo malignant transformation. This post hoc analysis evaluated and classified malignancies in patients with GCTB who received denosumab.

Methods

This analysis was conducted on patients with pathologically confirmed GCTB and measurable active disease treated with denosumab 120?mg subcutaneously once every 4?weeks, with loading doses on study days 8 and 15, as part of a phase 2, open-label, multicenter study. We identified potential cases of malignancy related to GCTB through an independent multidisciplinary review or medical history, associated imaging or histopathologic reports, and disease course. The findings were summarized and no statistical analysis was performed.

Results

Twenty of five hundred twenty-six patients (3.8%) who received at least one dose of denosumab were misdiagnosed with GCTB that was later discovered to be malignancies: five primary malignant GCTB, five secondary malignant GCTB, four sarcomatous transformations, and six patients with other malignancies (giant cell-rich osteosarcoma, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, spindle cell sarcoma, osteogenic sarcoma, phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor of mixed connective tissue type, and fibrosarcoma/malignant fibrous histiocytoma). Many malignancies were present before denosumab was initiated (8 definitive cases, 7 likely cases), excluding potential involvement of denosumab in these cases. Signs associated with potential misdiagnoses of GCTB included poor mineralization with denosumab treatment, rapid relapse in pain, or a failure of the typical dramatic improvement in pain normally observed with denosumab.

Conclusions

Although rare, GCTB can undergo malignant transformation, and rates in this study were consistent with previous reports. Signs of poor mineralization or lack of response to denosumab treatment may warrant close monitoring.

Trial registration

clinicaltrials.gov , ( NCT00680992 ). Registered May 20, 2008.

SUBMITTER: Palmerini E

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7824947 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Malignancy in giant cell tumor of bone: analysis of an open-label phase 2 study of denosumab.

Palmerini Emanuela E Seeger Leanne L LL Gambarotti Marco M Righi Alberto A Reichardt Peter P Bukata Susan S Blay Jean-Yves JY Dai Tian T Jandial Danielle D Picci Piero P

BMC cancer 20210122 1

<h4>Background</h4>Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a rare osteoclastogenic stromal tumor. GCTB can rarely undergo malignant transformation. This post hoc analysis evaluated and classified malignancies in patients with GCTB who received denosumab.<h4>Methods</h4>This analysis was conducted on patients with pathologically confirmed GCTB and measurable active disease treated with denosumab 120 mg subcutaneously once every 4 weeks, with loading doses on study days 8 and 15, as part of a phase 2, ...[more]

PMID: 33482769

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundMalignancy in giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a rare tumor with relevant literature being sparse. In primary malignant GCTB, distinct areas of benign GCTB are juxtaposed with high-grade sarcoma, while in secondary malignant GCTB sarcoma occurs at the site of previously managed GCTB. This study assesses the distinguishing characteristics of patients with this condition, the time interval for development of secondary malignant GCTB, the outcome of treatment, and explores factors associated with oncologic outcomes.MethodsThis is a retrospective case series of patients from a prospectively collected institutional musculoskeletal oncology database. From January 1998 to December 2016, 1365 patients were managed for extremity GCTBs. 32 (2.3%) patients had malignant GCTB, including 12 with primary malignant GCTB and 20 with secondary malignant GCTB. The study population comprised 18 males and 14 females presenting at a mean age of 33.7 years (±13.0) and followed for a mean of 9.5 years (±7.4). Data were collected on patient and treatment-related factors, and the occurrence of local recurrence, metastasis, and death. The time from the diagnosis of GCTB to the secondary malignant GCTB was defined as the latent period.ResultsMalignant GCTB most commonly presents in the distal femur and proximal tibia with pain and swelling. Radiologically, they are aggressive Campanacci Grade III tumors with prominent bony destruction and soft tissue extension. In the 20 patients with secondary malignant GCTB, the tumors were osteosarcoma in 15, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma in 4 patients and fibrosarcoma in one patient. The mean latent period in patients with secondary malignant GCTB was 7.9 year (±7.3). The median recurrence-free survival (RFS) of secondary malignant GCTB (latent period) and benign GCTB were 61.5 and 19 months respectively (p < 0.001), receiver operating curve analysis found 49.5 months to be the critical threshold, with a longer interval to recurrence being seen in malignant recurrence. The 5 and 10-year overall survival rate of malignant GCTB were 45.8% and 36.1% respectively. The 5-year survival rates of primary malignant GCTB and secondary malignant GCTB were 56.2% and 40.0% respectively (p = 0.188). Adequate surgical margins decreased the local recurrence (LR) rate (P = 0.006). Pulmonary metastasis developed in 69% of patients. The median distant metastasis-free survival between malignant GCTB and benign GCTB were 9 and 21 months (p = 0.002). Chemotherapy was associated with a longer pulmonary metastasis free survival (13 months Vs 6 months, P = 0.002), but not with increased overall survival (57.0% Vs 33.3%, P = 0.167).ConclusionsMalignant GCTB carries a poor prognosis. Accurate diagnosis is critical to avoid inadequate surgical margins when treating primary malignant GCTB. Aggressive tumors and pulmonary metastasis should raise suspicion for malignant GCTB. Secondary malignant transformation should be suspected in patients presenting with recurrence especially after 4 years. Adjuvant chemotherapy use did not benefit survival, but was associated with increased pulmonary progression-free survival.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Denosumab has been shown to reduce tumor size and progression, reform mineralized bone, and increase intralesional bone density in patients with giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB); however, radiologic assessment of tumors in bone is challenging. The study objective was to assess tumor response to denosumab using three different imaging parameters in a prespecified analysis in patients with GCTB from two phase 2 studies. METHODS:The studies enrolled adults and adolescents (skeletally mature and at least 12 years of age) with radiographically measurable GCTB that were given denosumab 120 mg every 4 weeks, with additional doses on days 8 and 15 of cycle 1. The proportion of patients with an objective tumor response was assessed using either Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST), European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer response criteria (positron emission tomography [PET] scan criteria), or inverse Choi density/size (ICDS) criteria. Target lesions were measured by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging (both studies), PET (study 2 only), or plain film radiograph (study 2 only). RESULTS:Most patients (71.6%) had an objective tumor response by at least one response criteria. Per RECIST, 25.1% of patients had a response; per PET scan criteria, 96.2% had a response; per ICDS, 76.1% had a response. 68.5% had an objective tumor response ??24 weeks. Using any criteria, crude incidence of response ranged from 56% (vertebrae/skull) to 91% (lung/soft tissue), and 98.2% had tumor control ??24 weeks. Reduced PET avidity appeared to be an early sign of response to denosumab treatment. CONCLUSION:Modified PET scan criteria and ICDS criteria indicate that most patients show responses and higher benefit rates than modified RECIST, and therefore may be useful for early assessment of response to denosumab. TRIAL REGISTRATION:ClinicalTrials.gov Clinical Trials Registry NCT00396279 (retrospectively registered November 6, 2006) and NCT00680992 (retrospectively registered May 20, 2008).

Project description:Giant cell tumors of bone (GCTB) are locally aggressive osteolytic bone tumors. Recently, some clinical trials have shown that denosumab is a novel and effective therapeutic option for aggressive and recurrent GCTB. This study was performed to investigate the molecular mechanism underlying the therapeutic effect of denosumab. Comparative proteomic analyses were performed using GCTB samples which were taken before and after denosumab treatment. Each expression profile was analyzed using the software program to further understand the affected biological network. One of identified proteins was further evaluated by gelatin zymography and an immunohistochemical analysis. We identified 13 consistently upregulated proteins and 19 consistently downregulated proteins in the pre- and post-denosumab samples. Using these profiles, the software program identified molecular interactions between the differentially expressed proteins that were indirectly involved in the RANK/RANKL pathway and in several non-canonical subpathways including the Matrix metalloproteinase pathway. The data analysis also suggested that the identified proteins play a critical functional role in the osteolytic process of GCTB. Among the most downregulated proteins, the activity of MMP-9 was significantly decreased in the denosumab-treated samples, although the residual stromal cells were found to express MMP-9 by an immunohistochemical analysis. The expression level of MMP-9 in the primary GCTB samples was not correlated with any clinicopathological factors, including patient outcomes. Although the replacement of tumors by fibro-osseous tissue or the diminishment of osteoclast-like giant cells have been shown as therapeutic effects of denosumab, the residual tumor after denosumab treatment, which is composed of only stromal cells, might be capable of causing bone destruction; thus the therapeutic application of denosumab would be still necessary for these lesions. We believe that the protein expression patterns and the results of the network analysis will provide a better understanding of the effects of denosumab administration in patients with GCTB.

Dataset Information

Malignancy in giant cell tumor of bone: analysis of an open-label phase 2 study of denosumab.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Trial registration

Publications

Malignancy in giant cell tumor of bone: analysis of an open-label phase 2 study of denosumab.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets