Dataset Information

Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban vs. Warfarin in Venous Thromboembolism Patients with Obesity and Morbid Obesity.

ABSTRACT: This study integrated 5 United States healthcare claims databases to evaluate the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) and major bleeding (MB) among VTE patients who initiated apixaban vs. warfarin, stratified by obesity. Obese and morbidly obese patients were identified based on diagnosis codes. Stabilized inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) was conducted to balance observed patient characteristics between treatment cohorts. An interaction analysis was conducted to evaluate treatment effects of apixaban vs. warfarin according to obesity status. Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the risk of recurrent VTE and MB among IPTW weighted obese and morbidly obese patients. A total of 112,024 non-obese patients and 43,095 obese patients were identified, of whom 19,751 were morbidly obese. When stratified by obesity status post-IPTW, no significant interactions were observed for effects of apixaban vs. warfarin on recurrent VTE or MB (interaction p > 0.10). Among IPTW obese and morbidly obese patients, apixaban was associated with a significantly lower risk of recurrent VTE (obese: 0.73 [0.64-0.84]; morbidly obese: 0.65 [0.53-0.80]) and MB (obese: 0.73 [0.62-0.85]; morbidly obese: 0.68 [0.54-0.86]) as compared with warfarin. In this large sample of obese and morbidly obese VTE patients, apixaban had a significantly lower risk of recurrent VTE and MB vs. warfarin.

SUBMITTER: Cohen A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7827069 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban vs. Warfarin in Venous Thromboembolism Patients with Obesity and Morbid Obesity.

Cohen Alexander A Sah Janvi J Lee Theodore T Rosenblatt Lisa L Hlavacek Patrick P Emir Birol B Keshishian Allison A Yuce Huseyin H Luo Xuemei X

Journal of clinical medicine 20210108 2

This study integrated 5 United States healthcare claims databases to evaluate the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) and major bleeding (MB) among VTE patients who initiated apixaban vs. warfarin, stratified by obesity. Obese and morbidly obese patients were identified based on diagnosis codes. Stabilized inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) was conducted to balance observed patient characteristics between treatment cohorts. An interaction analysis was conducted to evaluate ...[more]

PMID: 33429844

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionAs a result of limited clinical data, guidelines do not recommend the use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients who weigh > 120 kg or have a body mass index (BMI) > 40 kg/m2.MethodsThis post hoc analysis of the AMPLIFY trial evaluated the efficacy (venous thromboembolism [VTE]/VTE-related death), safety (major and composite of major and clinically relevant non-major [CRNM] bleeding), and exposure of apixaban compared with enoxaparin followed by warfarin for the treatment of VTE by body weight (≤ 60, > 60 to < 100, ≥ 100 to < 120, ≥ 120 kg) and BMI (≤ 25, > 25 to 30, > 30 to 35, > 35 to 40, > 40 kg/m2).ResultsAmong the AMPLIFY safety population, 5384 and 5359 patients had recorded body weight (range 28.9 to 222.0 kg; ≥ 120 kg, n = 290) and BMI (range 12.5-71.8 kg/m2; > 40 kg/m2, n = 263), respectively. The rates of recurrent VTE/VTE-related death for apixaban versus enoxaparin/warfarin were similar across body weight subgroups: relative risks (RR; 95% confidence intervals [CI]) were 0.63 (0.23, 1.72), 0.99 (0.65, 1.50), 0.77 (0.34, 1.72), and 0.20 (0.02, 1.72) for the ≤ 60, > 60 to < 100, ≥ 100 to < 120, and ≥ 120 kg groups, respectively (Pinteraction = 0.44). The rates of major bleeding were lower with apixaban versus enoxaparin/warfarin; RRs (95% CI) were 0.15 (0.02, 1.15), 0.41 (0.21, 0.77), not estimable, and 0.34 (0.04, 3.22), respectively (Pinteraction = not estimable). The rates of major/CRNM bleeding were significantly lower for apixaban versus enoxaparin/warfarin; RRs (95% CI) were 0.46 (0.24, 0.89), 0.49 (0.38, 0.63), 0.30 (0.16, 0.58), and 0.28 (0.12, 0.66), respectively (Pinteraction = 0.36). Similar trends were seen in the BMI subgroups. There was a modest, not clinically meaningful, decrease (< 30%) in the median predicted exposure with increasing body weight (n = 281).ConclusionsThe findings of this post hoc analysis support the use of apixaban in patients with body weight ≥ 120 kg or BMI > 40 kg/m2.Trial registration numberNCT00643201.

Project description:ImportanceCurrent guidelines recommend a 28-day course of enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after surgery for gynecologic cancer. The high cost of this medication and the low adherence rates observed in prior studies provide an opportunity to benefit patients by demonstrating the safety of a more cost-effective, easier to use thromboprophylactic.ObjectiveTo investigate the safety and efficacy of an oral treatment alternative for thromboprophylaxis in postoperative patients with gynecologic cancer.Design, setting, and participantsThis was a patient-based, multicenter, open-label, blinded, end point, randomized clinical trial conducted May 2015 to March 2019 in outpatient and inpatient gynecologic oncology settings. Women undergoing surgery for suspected or confirmed gynecologic cancer were approached for recruitment. The trial compared rates of major bleeding and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding events during a 90-day follow-up period in patients taking apixaban or enoxaparin for postoperative thromboprophylaxis using a modified intent-to-treat analysis. Data analysis was performed from October to December 2019.InterventionsWomen were randomized to 28 days of apixaban (2.5 mg orally twice daily) or enoxaparin (40 mg subcutaneously daily).Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was major bleeding and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding events. Secondary outcomes included incidence of venous thromboembolic events, adverse events, medication adherence, participant quality of life, and medication satisfaction.ResultsOf 500 women recruited for the study, 400 were enrolled and randomized (median age, 58.0 years; range, 18.0-89.0 years); 204 received apixaban and 196 received enoxaparin. Treatment groups did not differ in terms of race/ethnicity, cancer stage, or surgery modality (open vs robotic). There were no statistically significant differences between the apixaban and enoxaparin groups in terms of rates of major bleeding events (1 patient [0.5%] vs 1 patient [0.5%]; odds ratio [OR], 1.04; 95% CI, 0.07-16.76; P > .99), clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding events (12 patients [5.4%] vs 19 patients [9.7%]; OR, 1.88; 95% CI, 0.87-4.1; P = .11), venous thromboembolic events (2 patients [1.0%] vs 3 patients [1.5%]; OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 0.26-9.50; P = .68), adverse events, medication adherence, or quality of life between the groups. Participant satisfaction was significantly greater in the apixaban group with regard to ease of taking the medication (186 patients [98.9%] vs 110 patients [58.8%]; OR, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.01-0.25; P < .001) and pain associated with taking the medication (4 patients [2.1%] vs 92 patients [49.2%]; OR, 9.20; 95% CI, 2.67-31.82; P < .001).Conclusions and relevanceThese findings suggest that oral apixaban is a potentially safe, less painful, and easier-to-take alternative to subcutaneous enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after surgery for gynecologic cancer. The efficacy of apixaban to prevent venous thromboembolic events is hypothesized as being equivalent.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02366871.

Dataset Information

Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban vs. Warfarin in Venous Thromboembolism Patients with Obesity and Morbid Obesity.

Publications

Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban vs. Warfarin in Venous Thromboembolism Patients with Obesity and Morbid Obesity.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets