Dataset Information

Regenerative Medicine for Equine Musculoskeletal Diseases.

ABSTRACT: Musculoskeletal injuries and chronic degenerative diseases commonly affect both athletic and sedentary horses and can entail the end of their athletic careers. The ensuing repair processes frequently do not yield fully functional regeneration of the injured tissues but biomechanically inferior scar or replacement tissue, causing high reinjury rates, degenerative disease progression and chronic morbidity. Regenerative medicine is an emerging, rapidly evolving branch of translational medicine that aims to replace or regenerate cells, tissues, or organs to restore or establish normal function. It includes tissue engineering but also cell-based and cell-free stimulation of endogenous self-repair mechanisms. Some regenerative medicine therapies have made their way into equine clinical practice mainly to treat tendon injures, tendinopathies, cartilage injuries and degenerative joint disorders with promising results. However, the qualitative and quantitative spatiotemporal requirements for specific bioactive factors to trigger tissue regeneration in the injury response are still unknown, and consequently, therapeutic approaches and treatment results are diverse. To exploit the full potential of this burgeoning field of medicine, further research will be required and is ongoing. This review summarises the current knowledge of commonly used regenerative medicine treatments in equine patients and critically discusses their use.

SUBMITTER: Ribitsch I

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7832834 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Regenerative Medicine for Equine Musculoskeletal Diseases.

Ribitsch Iris I Oreff Gil Lola GL Jenner Florien F

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI 20210119 1

Musculoskeletal injuries and chronic degenerative diseases commonly affect both athletic and sedentary horses and can entail the end of their athletic careers. The ensuing repair processes frequently do not yield fully functional regeneration of the injured tissues but biomechanically inferior scar or replacement tissue, causing high reinjury rates, degenerative disease progression and chronic morbidity. Regenerative medicine is an emerging, rapidly evolving branch of translational medicine that ...[more]

PMID: 33477808

Similar Datasets

Project description:The field of regenerative medicine is growing rapidly with the introduction of new therapies that have the potential to treat and cure serious medical conditions, including rare diseases, for which there are no available treatments. In the United States, the development of novel medical products is regulated and guided by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). As scientific and technological advances are discovered and adopted by the medical industrial enterprise, the FDA's implementation of policies that create a climate conducive to safe development and rapid availability of novel medical products is one of the pillars which support the Agency's mission of protecting and promoting the public health. With advancements in cell modifications and tissue engineering, innovative creation of biomaterials, adoption of three-dimensional bioprinting, and rapid development of human genome editing technologies, the need for Agency's work in ensuring that its science-based policies remain relevant and helpful in facilitating the availability of new treatments to the most vulnerable populations of patients becomes more pressing than ever before. In December 2016, Congress amended section 506 of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic (FD&C) Act [21 U.S.C. 356] by adding a new section 506(g), which defines the categories of products considered to be regenerative medicine therapies. As further described by FDA [1], regenerative medicine therapies are considered to include cell therapies, therapeutic tissue engineering products, human cell and tissue products, and combination products using any such therapies, as well as gene therapies, including genetically modified cells that lead to a durable modification of cells or tissues. The development and approval of regenerative medicine therapies are regulated by FDA's Office of Tissues and Advanced Therapies (OTAT) in the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER). In this review article, we present practical considerations for investigating regenerative medicine therapies intended for the treatment of rare diseases. The material presented may be useful to researchers who are undertaking the challenging task of finding and delivering new treatments for those in need.

Project description:Background: The use of regenerative medicine as an "off label" treatment for musculoskeletal conditions has increased in recent years. However, the literature is sparse regarding the costs of these treatments to patients. Purposes: We sought to determine the patient-incurred costs for regenerative medicine treatments performed by physicians for musculoskeletal conditions in the United States, according to primary specialty, geographic region, practice setting, and years in practice. We also sought to characterize pre- and posttreatment protocols and image guidance use. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study with data collection occurring between April 2020 and April 2021. It began with the distribution of an online survey through an email campaign by the American College of Sports Medicine to its members. Approximately 90 emails were sent by our research team as well. Throughout the year, various participant recruitment methods were used (through Twitter, for example). Survey data included physician demographics, practice/training information, types/costs of regenerative medicine treatments performed, and pre-/postprocedure protocols. Results: One hundred physicians who self-reported performing standalone regenerative medicine procedures participated in this online survey. According to the responses, the most common treatments performed were platelet-rich plasma (PRP; 100%), bone marrow concentrate (BMC; 41%), microfragmented adipose grafting (36%), prolotherapy (33%), and bone marrow aspirate (BMA; 21%) administered to the peripheral joints, tendons/muscles, ligaments, and/or spine. Overall, the respondents reported large variations in treatment costs to patients; BMA and BMC were the most expensive and had the largest ranges in costs for all anatomical locations. Costs for PRP were lower than those for BMA and BMC, with less variation. Physicians in private practice reported higher PRP, BMC, and BMA costs in the peripheral joints than those in academic settings. Most physicians recommended avoiding non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs pre- and postprocedure, and 74% recommended physical therapy postprocedure. Conclusions: Findings from a survey of physicians who provide regenerative medicine procedures as off-label treatment for musculoskeletal conditions suggest that there is variation in related patient-incurred costs. Future studies should explore associations between treatment costs and outcomes.

Dataset Information

Regenerative Medicine for Equine Musculoskeletal Diseases.

Publications

Regenerative Medicine for Equine Musculoskeletal Diseases.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets