Dataset Information

Explaining the Social Acceptance of Renewables through Location-Related Factors: An Application to the Portuguese Case.

ABSTRACT: The public perception of renewable energy sources is generally positive, due to their role in air pollution and CO₂ emission mitigation policies. However, there are local environmental detrimental effects, and empirical evidence is not consistent as to the support of local communities. In the present paper, we analyse the antecedents of public generic perceptions of renewables grounded on objective location-related factors. Personal location-related factors can originate in the involvement of individuals with renewable energy sources. Regional location-related factors concern the importance of the renewable energy source in the district of residence and in relation to other renewables. We implement a questionnaire on public perceptions of renewable energy sources by the general population in mainland Portugal and complement respondent-level responses with renewable energy district information. Regression analysis shows that these objective location-related factors, both personal and regional, help explain public perceptions of renewables and thus we find empirical support for the proposed approach. These results can inform and guide policymakers in tackling future social acceptance issues of renewable energy policies towards lower carbon emissions and less polluting energy production.

SUBMITTER: Pinto LMC

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7832858 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Explaining the Social Acceptance of Renewables through Location-Related Factors: An Application to the Portuguese Case.

Pinto Lígia M Costa LMC Sousa Sara S Valente Marieta M

International journal of environmental research and public health 20210119 2

The public perception of renewable energy sources is generally positive, due to their role in air pollution and CO<sub>2</sub> emission mitigation policies. However, there are local environmental detrimental effects, and empirical evidence is not consistent as to the support of local communities. In the present paper, we analyse the antecedents of public generic perceptions of renewables grounded on objective location-related factors. Personal location-related factors can originate in the involv ...[more]

PMID: 33477844

Similar Datasets

Project description:As a consequence of the Covid-19 pandemic, several governments adopted disease containment measures limiting individual freedom, especially freedom of movement. Our contribution aims at studying the role played by party preferences in explaining attitudes towards those freedom limitations during the pandemic, taking into account the moderating role played by confidence in institutions and collectivist-individualistic orientations. Focussing on Italy, as the first western democracy to be hit by Covid-19 and to adopt harsh restrictive measures, we analyse data coming from the ResPOnsE COVID-19 project. Our study initially investigates whether attitudes towards freedom restrictions are associated with the dynamics of the pandemic and the institutional responses to it. Then, through multilevel regression models, we test several hypotheses about the relationship between party preferences, confidence in institutions, collectivistic orientations and public acceptance of Covid-19 containment measures limiting individual freedom. Findings show that party preferences are associated with different attitudes towards freedom restrictions to contain the pandemic, but this occurs only if people have individualistic orientations. Collectivistic orientations and confidence in institutions are positively associated with acceptance of freedom restrictions, regardless of party preferences. As regards the latter, neither a classical ideological explanation (conservative people more inclined to accept limitations to personal freedoms) nor a government-opposition explanation (supporters of government parties more inclined to accept freedom restrictions) seems to be adequate to fully account for the mechanisms behind acceptance of Covid-19 harsh containment measures. Thus, we offer an alternative ideological explanation by pointing out the ambiguous nature of contemporary right-wing populisms.Supplementary informationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11135-022-01436-3.

Project description:Rationale: National guidelines have laid out a process to conflict resolution in cases of potentially inappropriate medical interventions. Objectives: To determine the association between information about a process-based approach and lay public perceptions of the appropriateness of withholding medically inappropriate interventions. Methods: Respondents from a nationwide sample completed a survey with two adult intensive care unit-based vignettes: one about advanced cancer where doctors told the family that additional chemotherapy would not be offered, and a second case of multiorgan failure after brain hemorrhage where dialysis would not be offered. Participants were randomly assigned to see or not see information about a detailed process for the determination to withhold (second opinion, ethics consultation, exploring transfer to another institution). The primary outcome was the perceived appropriateness of not providing the treatment (four-point scale, dichotomized for analysis, modified Poisson regression), and the secondary outcome was the negative emotional reaction to the case (positive and negative affect schedule, range 1-5, higher is greater negative emotional response, linear regression). Results: A total of 1,191 respondents were included. Providing detailed process information increased the perceived appropriateness of withholding treatment by approximately 10 percentage points in each vignette: (chemotherapy, 75.7-85.4%; dialysis, 68.0-79.3%). Process information remained associated with perceived appropriateness of withholding treatment after adjustment for order effects and prespecified respondent characteristics (chemotherapy: prevalence ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-1.19) (dialysis: prevalence ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.10-1.25). Process information was not associated with emotional response to the cases (chemotherapy: β = -0.04; 95% CI, -0.16 to 0.09) (dialysis: β = -0.02; 95% CI, -0.14 to 0.10; both adjusted for order effects). Conclusions: Providing process-based conflict resolution information increased public acceptance of determinations of medical futility, supporting the practice outlined in national consensus statements.

Project description:Research findings are best understood by considering contextual factors such as treatment plausibility: how likely it is that a studied treatment or manipulation is effective, based on theory and data. If a treatment is implausible, then more evidence should be required before believing it has an effect. The current study assessed the extent to which the interpretation of a research finding is affected by treatment plausibility. Participant age varied from 18 to 82 (M = 27.4, SD = 9.4), and about half of the participants (53%) were college students. A total of 600 participants read a brief news article about an experiment with a new type of psychotherapy for weight loss. The current study used a 2 (treatment plausibility) × 3 (results type) between-subjects factorial design. Treatment plausibility had two levels: (1) a plausible cognitive behavioral therapy and (2) an implausible "psychic reinforcement therapy" that was described as employing psychic messages to promote weight loss. The three levels of the results type factor varied how the study results were presented in the article: (1) standard results with no mention of treatment plausibility, (2) standard results followed by interpretive statements focused on treatment plausibility, and (3) no results-the study was described as still in progress. Participants rated their belief in the effectiveness of the therapy on a scale of 0 to 100% in 10% increments. When treatment plausibility was not discussed in the article, average ratings for the implausible therapy were relatively high (M = 63.1%, SD = 25.0, 95% CI% [58.2-68.1]) and similar to those for the plausible therapy (M = 69.2%, SD = 21.5, 95% CI% [65.0-73.5]). Ratings for the implausible treatment were moderately lower when the article explained why the results supporting it were questionable (M = 48.5%, SD = 26.6, 95% CI% [43.2-53.8]). The findings of the current study suggest that students and other members of the public may draw incorrect inferences from research partly because they do not appreciate the importance of treatment plausibility. This could be remedied, though not completely, by explicitly discussing the plausibility of the treatment based on theory and prior data.

Dataset Information

Explaining the Social Acceptance of Renewables through Location-Related Factors: An Application to the Portuguese Case.

Publications

Explaining the Social Acceptance of Renewables through Location-Related Factors: An Application to the Portuguese Case.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets