Dataset Information

Aerosol generation during chest compression and defibrillation in a swine cardiac arrest model.

ABSTRACT:

Aim

It remains unclear whether cardiac arrest (CA) resuscitation generates aerosols that can transmit respiratory pathogens. We hypothesize that chest compression and defibrillation generate aerosols that could contain the SARS-CoV-2 virus in a swine CA model.

Methods

To simulate witnessed CA with bystander-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation, 3 female non-intubated swine underwent 4?min of ventricular fibrillation without chest compression or defibrillation (no-flow) followed by ten 2-min cycles of mechanical chest compression and defibrillation without ventilation. The diameter (0.3-10??m) and quantity of aerosols generated during 45-s intervals of no-flow and chest compression before and after defibrillation were analyzed by a particle analyzer. Aerosols generated from the coughs of 4 healthy human subjects were also compared to aerosols generated by swine.

Results

There was no significant difference between the total aerosols generated during chest compression before defibrillation compared to no-flow. In contrast, chest compression after defibrillation generated significantly more aerosols than chest compression before defibrillation or no-flow (72.4?±?41.6?×?10⁴ vs 12.3?±?8.3?×?10⁴ vs 10.5?±?11.2?×?10⁴; p?4 aerosols with a size distribution smaller than post-defibrillation chest compression.

Conclusions

Chest compressions alone did not cause significant aerosol generation in this swine model. However, increased aerosol generation was detected during chest compression immediately following defibrillation. Additional research is needed to elucidate the clinical significance and mechanisms by which aerosol generation during chest compression is modified by defibrillation.

SUBMITTER: Hsu CH

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7833865 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Aerosol generation during chest compression and defibrillation in a swine cardiac arrest model.

Hsu Cindy H CH Tiba Mohamad H MH Boehman André L AL McCracken Brendan M BM Leander Danielle C DC Francalancia Stephanie C SC Pickell Zachary Z Sanderson Thomas H TH Ward Kevin R KR Neumar Robert W RW

Resuscitation 20201215

<h4>Aim</h4>It remains unclear whether cardiac arrest (CA) resuscitation generates aerosols that can transmit respiratory pathogens. We hypothesize that chest compression and defibrillation generate aerosols that could contain the SARS-CoV-2 virus in a swine CA model.<h4>Methods</h4>To simulate witnessed CA with bystander-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation, 3 female non-intubated swine underwent 4 min of ventricular fibrillation without chest compression or defibrillation (no-flow) followed ...[more]

PMID: 33338570

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundRecently, we developed a chest compression device that can move the chest compression position without interruption during CPR and be remotely controlled to minimize rescuer exposure to infectious diseases. The purpose of this study was to compare its performance with conventional mechanical CPR device in a mannequin and a swine model of cardiac arrest.Materials and methodsA prototype of a remote-controlled automatic chest compression device (ROSCER) that can change the chest compression position without interruption during CPR was developed, and its performance was compared with LUCAS 3 in a mannequin and a swine model of cardiac arrest. In a swine model of cardiac arrest, 16 male pigs were randomly assigned into the two groups, ROSCER CPR (n = 8) and LUCAS 3 CPR (n = 8), respectively. During 5 minutes of CPR, hemodynamic parameters including aortic pressure, right atrial pressure, coronary perfusion pressure, common carotid blood flow, and end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure were measured.ResultsIn the compression performance test using a mannequin, compression depth, compression time, decompression time, and plateau time were almost equal between ROSCER and LUCAS 3. In a swine model of cardiac arrest, coronary perfusion pressure showed no difference between the two groups (p = 0.409). Systolic aortic pressure and carotid blood flow were higher in the LUCAS 3 group than in the ROSCER group during 5 minutes of CPR (p < 0.001, p = 0.008, respectively). End-tidal CO2 level of the ROSCER group was initially lower than that of the LUCAS 3 group, but was higher over time (p = 0.022). A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for ROSC also showed no difference between the two groups (p = 0.46).ConclusionThe prototype of a remote-controlled automated chest compression device can move the chest compression position without interruption during CPR. In a mannequin and a swine model of cardiac arrest, the device showed no inferior performance to a conventional mechanical CPR device.

Project description:BackgroundCurrent guidelines recommend a 50 mm or greater compression depth for manual chest compression in adults. However, whether this uniform compression depth is a suitable requirement for mechanical CPR remains to be determined. We hypothesized that a relatively shallow compression depth (30 mm) would have similar hemodynamic efficacy but fewer complications versus the standard compression depth (50 mm) during mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with the miniaturized chest compressor (MCC) in a porcine model.MethodsIn the current study, we used a total of 16 domestic male pigs (38±2 kg). All pigs were exposed to 7 min of ventricular fibrillation (VF) followed by 5 min of CPR. Then the animals were randomly assigned to the shallow (30 mm) group and the standard (50 mm) group. At the second min of CPR, every pig was given epinephrine (20 µg/kg) through the femoral vein and repeated every 3 min. First defibrillation was delivered with a single 120 J shock at 5 min of CPR. Hemodynamics, carotid blood flow (CBF), end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2), coronary perfusion pressure (CPP), intrathoracic pressure (ITP) and arterial blood gas were measured. Rib fractures and lung injuries, as indicated by ground-glass opacification (GGO), as well as intense parenchymal opacification (IPO), were assessed and calculated by quantitative computed tomography (QCT) scan.ResultsWe found no significant differences in CPP, CBF, or ETCO2 between the both groups throughout the CPR period. After administration of epinephrine, the CPP of all animals increased while ETCO2 and CBF decreased during CPR. A significantly lower intrathoracic positive pressure (ITPP) and systolic artery pressure (SAP) were measured in the shallow group at the first min of CPR. However, we didn't find remarkable differences in these values between the both groups for the next 4 min of CPR. All animals were successfully resuscitated. The shallow group had significantly lower IPO QCT scores compared with the standard group. We found no significant differences in GGO QCT scores after resuscitation between both groups.ConclusionsRelatively shallow compression depth has similar hemodynamic efficacy but fewer complications versus the standard compression depth.

Dataset Information

Aerosol generation during chest compression and defibrillation in a swine cardiac arrest model.

Aim

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Aerosol generation during chest compression and defibrillation in a swine cardiac arrest model.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets