Dataset Information

Effects of mechanical ventilation and portable air cleaner on aerosol removal from dental treatment rooms.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

To evaluate the mechanical ventilation rates of dental treatment rooms and assess the effectiveness of aerosol removal by mechanical ventilation and a portable air cleaner (PAC) with a high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filter.

Methods

Volumetric airflow were measured to assess air change rate per hour by ventilation (ACH_vent). Equivalent ventilation provided by the PAC (ACH_pac) was calculated based on its clean air delivery rate. Concentrations of 0.3, 0.5 and 1.0 ?m aerosol particles were measured in 10 dental treatment rooms with various ventilation rates at baseline, after 5-min of incense burn, and after 30-min of observation with and without the PAC or ventilation system in operation. Velocities of aerosol removal were assessed by concentration decay constants for the 0.3 ?m particles with ventilation alone (K_n) and with ventilation and PAC (K_n+pac), and by times needed to reach 95 % and 100 % removal of accumulated aerosol particles.

Results

ACH_vent varied from 3 to 45. K_n and K_n+pac were correlated with ACH_vent (r = 0.90) and combined ACH_total (r = 0.81), respectively. Accumulated aerosol particles could not be removed by ventilation alone within 30-min in rooms with ACH_vent<15. PAC reduced aerosol accumulation and accelerated aerosol removal, and accumulated aerosols could be completely removed in 4 to 12-min by ventilation combined with PAC. Effectiveness of the PAC was especially prominent in rooms with poor ventilation. Added benefit of PAC in aerosol removal was inversely correlated with ACH_vent.

Conclusions

Aerosol accumulation may occur in dental treatment rooms with poor ventilation. Addition of PAC with a HEPA filter significantly reduced aerosol accumulation and accelerated aerosol removal.

Clinical significance

Addition of PAC with a HEPA filter improves aerosol removal in rooms with low ventilation rates.

SUBMITTER: Ren YF

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7834919 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Effects of mechanical ventilation and portable air cleaner on aerosol removal from dental treatment rooms.

Ren Yan-Fang YF Huang Qirong Q Marzouk Tamer T Richard Ray R Pembroke Karen K Martone Pat P Venner Tom T Malmstrom Hans H Eliav Eli E

Journal of dentistry 20201231

<h4>Objectives</h4>To evaluate the mechanical ventilation rates of dental treatment rooms and assess the effectiveness of aerosol removal by mechanical ventilation and a portable air cleaner (PAC) with a high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filter.<h4>Methods</h4>Volumetric airflow were measured to assess air change rate per hour by ventilation (ACH<sub>vent</sub>). Equivalent ventilation provided by the PAC (ACH<sub>pac</sub>) was calculated based on its clean air delivery rate. Concentration ...[more]

PMID: 33388387

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Volume-controlled ventilation has been suggested to optimize lung deposition during nebulization although promoting spontaneous ventilation is targeted to avoid ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction. Comparing topographic aerosol lung deposition during volume-controlled ventilation and spontaneous ventilation in pressure support has never been performed. The aim of this study was to compare lung deposition of a radiolabeled aerosol generated with a vibrating-mesh nebulizer during invasive mechanical ventilation, with two modes: pressure support ventilation and volume-controlled ventilation. METHODS:Seventeen postoperative neurosurgery patients without pulmonary disease were randomly ventilated in pressure support or volume-controlled ventilation. Diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid labeled with technetium-99m (2 mCi/3 mL) was administrated using a vibrating-mesh nebulizer (Aerogen Solo(®), provided by Aerogen Ltd, Galway, Ireland) connected to the endotracheal tube. Pulmonary and extrapulmonary particles deposition was analyzed using planar scintigraphy. RESULTS:Lung deposition was 10.5 ± 3.0 and 15.1 ± 5.0 % of the nominal dose during pressure support and volume-controlled ventilation, respectively (p < 0.05). Higher endotracheal tube and tracheal deposition was observed during pressure support ventilation (27.4 ± 6.6 vs. 20.7 ± 6.0 %, p < 0.05). A similar penetration index was observed for the right (p = 0.210) and the left lung (p = 0.211) with both ventilation modes. A high intersubject variability of lung deposition was observed with both modes regarding lung doses, aerosol penetration and distribution between the right and the left lung. CONCLUSIONS:In the specific conditions of the study, volume-controlled ventilation was associated with higher lung deposition of nebulized particles as compared to pressure support ventilation. The clinical benefit of this effect warrants further studies. Clinical trial registration NCT01879488.

Project description:BackgroundsDental procedures involving drilling and grinding can produce a significant amount of suspended aerosol particles (PM) and bioaerosols. This study aims to analyze the size and concentration of aerosol particles generated during drilling and to investigate the effectiveness of two air exchange systems, namely forceful suction (FS) and air disinfection machines (DM), in removing PM.MethodsFor this study, 100 extracted permanent teeth were collected and divided into three groups: without suction (n = 50), suction with forceful suction (n = 25), and suction with air disinfection machines (n = 25). The removal rate of suspended aerosol particles was analyzed using particle counters and air data multimeter.ResultsWhen drilling and grinding were performed without vacuum, 0.75% of the aerosol particles generated were PM2.5-10, 78.25% of total suspended aerosol particles (TSP) were PM2.5, and 98.68% of TSP were PM1. The nanoanalyzer measurements revealed that the aerodynamic diameter of most aerosol particles was below 60 nm, with an average particle diameter of 52.61 nm and an average concentration of 2.6*1011 ultrafine aerosol particles. The air change per hour (ACH) was significantly lower in the air disinfection machines group compared to the forceful suction group. Additionally, the number of aerosol particles and mass concentration was significantly lower in the air disinfection machines group compared to the forceful suction group in terms of PM2.5 levels. However, the forceful suction group also reduced the mass concentration in PM10 level than the air disinfection machines group.ConclusionIn conclusion, the air exchange system can reduce the aerosol particles generated during drilling and grinding. Comparing the two air exchange systems, it was found that the air disinfection machines group reduces the number of aerosol particles and mass concentration in PM2.5 levels, while the forceful suction group reduces the mass concentration in PM10 level.

Dataset Information

Effects of mechanical ventilation and portable air cleaner on aerosol removal from dental treatment rooms.

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Clinical significance

Publications

Effects of mechanical ventilation and portable air cleaner on aerosol removal from dental treatment rooms.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets