Dataset Information

Meta-analysis of echocardiographic quantification of left ventricular filling pressure.

ABSTRACT:

Aims

The clinical reliability of echocardiographic surrogate markers of left ventricular filling pressures (LVFPs) across different cardiovascular pathologies remains unanswered. The main objective was to evaluate the evidence of how effectively different echocardiographic indices estimate true LVFP.

Methods and results

Design: this is a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Data source

Scopus, PubMed and Embase. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies were those that used echocardiography to predict or estimate pulmonary capillary wedge pressure or left ventricular end-diastolic pressures. Twenty-seven studies met criteria. Only eight studies (30%) reported both correlation coefficient and bias between non-invasive and invasively measured LVFPs. The majority of studies (74%) recorded invasive pulmonary capillary wedge pressure as a surrogate for left ventricular end-diastolic pressures. The pooled correlation coefficient overall was r = 0.69 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.63-0.75, P < 0.01]. Evaluation by cohort demonstrated varying association: heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (11 studies, n = 575, r = 0.59, 95% CI 0.53-0.64) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (8 studies, n = 381, r = 0.67, 95% CI 0.61-0.72).

Conclusions

Echocardiographic indices show moderate pooled association to invasively measured LVFP; however, this varies widely with disease state. In heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, no single echocardiography-based metric offers a reliable estimate. In heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, mitral inflow-derived indices (E/e', E/A, E/Vp, and EDcT) have reasonable clinical applicability. While an integrated approach of several echocardiographic metrics provides the most promise for estimating LVFP reliably, such strategies need further validation in larger, patient-specific studies.

SUBMITTER: Jones R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7835555 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Meta-analysis of echocardiographic quantification of left ventricular filling pressure.

Jones Rachel R Varian Frances F Alabed Samer S Morris Paul P Rothman Alexander A Swift Andrew J AJ Lewis Nigel N Kyriacou Andreas A Wild James M JM Al-Mohammad Abdallah A Zhong Liang L Dastidar Amardeep A Storey Robert F RF Swoboda Peter P PP Bax Jeroen J JJ Garg Pankaj P

ESC heart failure 20201123 1

<h4>Aims</h4>The clinical reliability of echocardiographic surrogate markers of left ventricular filling pressures (LVFPs) across different cardiovascular pathologies remains unanswered. The main objective was to evaluate the evidence of how effectively different echocardiographic indices estimate true LVFP.<h4>Methods and results</h4>Design: this is a systematic review and meta-analysis.<h4>Data source</h4>Scopus, PubMed and Embase. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies were those that use ...[more]

PMID: 33230957

Similar Datasets

Project description:Evaluation of left ventricular filling pressure plays an important role in the clinical management of pulmonary hypertension. However, the accuracy of echocardiographic parameters for the determination of left ventricular filling pressure in the presence of pulmonary vascular lesions has not been fully addressed. We retrospectively investigated 124 patients with pulmonary hypertension due to pulmonary vascular lesions (noncardiac pulmonary hypertension group) and 113 patients with ischemic heart disease (control group) who underwent right heart catheterization and echocardiography. The noncardiac pulmonary hypertension group was subdivided into less-advanced and advanced groups according to median pulmonary vascular resistance. Pulmonary artery wedge pressure was determined as left ventricular filling pressure. As echocardiographic parameters of left ventricular filling pressure, the ratio of early- (E) to late-diastolic transmitral flow velocity (E/A), ratio of E to early-diastolic mitral annular velocity (E/e'), and left atrial volume index were measured. In the less-advanced noncardiac pulmonary hypertension and control groups, positive correlations were observed between pulmonary artery wedge pressure and late-diastolic transmitral flow velocity (R = 0.41, P = 0.002 and R = 0.71, P < 0.001, respectively) and left atrial volume index (R = 0.53, P < 0.001 and R = 0.41, P < 0.001), whereas in the advanced noncardiac pulmonary hypertension group, pulmonary artery wedge pressure was only correlated with left atrial volume index (R = 0.27, P = 0.032). In the controls, only pulmonary artery wedge pressure determined E (β = 0.48, P < 0.001), whereas both pulmonary artery wedge pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance were independent determinants of E (β = 0.29, P < 0.001 and β = -0.28, P = 0.001, respectively) in the noncardiac pulmonary hypertension group. In conclusion, in the presence of advanced pulmonary vascular lesions, conventional echocardiographic parameters may not accurately reflect left ventricular filling pressure. Elevated pulmonary vascular resistance would lower the E, even when pulmonary artery wedge pressure is elevated, resulting in blunting of echocardiographic parameters for the detection of elevated left ventricular filling pressure.

Dataset Information

Meta-analysis of echocardiographic quantification of left ventricular filling pressure.

Aims

Methods and results

Data source

Conclusions

Publications

Meta-analysis of echocardiographic quantification of left ventricular filling pressure.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets