Dataset Information

Development of epimedin A complex drugs for treating the osteoporosis.

ABSTRACT: Osteoporosis is the most common disease involving bone degeneration. As the age of the population increases, the prevalence of the disease is expected to rise. However, current treatment methods do not provide a desirable solution for the restoration of the function of degenerated bones in patients with osteoporosis. This led to emergence of controlled delivery systems to increase drug bioavailability and efficacy specifically at the bone regeneration. In this study, an epimedin A (EA) complex drug system was prepared by solution blending method. In vitro cell-based experiments showed that the EA complex drug could significantly promote the differentiation and proliferation of osteoblasts and increase the alkaline phosphatase activity, calcium nodule formation, and the expression of osteogenesis-related genes and proteins. In vivo experiments further demonstrated that this novel drugs remarkably enhanced bone regeneration. These results suggest that EA may be used for the treatment of osteoporosis.

SUBMITTER: Liu Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7840628 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Development of epimedin A complex drugs for treating the osteoporosis.

Liu Ying Y Bi Yanan Y Chai Lijuan L Song Lei L Huang Juyang J Wang Qin Q Li Yunzhang Y Zhou Kun K

Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine 20210127 1

Osteoporosis is the most common disease involving bone degeneration. As the age of the population increases, the prevalence of the disease is expected to rise. However, current treatment methods do not provide a desirable solution for the restoration of the function of degenerated bones in patients with osteoporosis. This led to emergence of controlled delivery systems to increase drug bioavailability and efficacy specifically at the bone regeneration. In this study, an epimedin A (EA) complex d ...[more]

PMID: 33506368

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundInfection with the protozoan Entamoeba histolytica is common in low- and middle-income countries, and up to 100,000 people with severe disease die every year. Adequate therapy for amoebic colitis is necessary to reduce illness, prevent development of complicated disease and extraintestinal spread, and decrease transmission.ObjectivesTo evaluate antiamoebic drugs for treating amoebic colitis.Search methodsWe searched the available literature up to 22 March 2018. We searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, mRCT, and conference proceedings. We contacted individual researchers, organizations, and pharmaceutical companies, and we checked reference lists.Selection criteriaRandomized controlled trials of antiamoebic drugs given alone or in combination, compared with placebo or another antiamoebic drug, for treating adults and children with a diagnosis of amoebic colitis.Data collection and analysisTwo review authors independently assessed the eligibility and methodological quality of trials and extracted and analysed the data. We calculated clinical and parasitological failure rates and rates of relapse and adverse events as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), using a random-effects model. We determined statistical heterogeneity and explored possible sources of heterogeneity using subgroup analyses. We carried out sensitivity analysis by using trial quality to assess the robustness of reported results.Main resultsIn total, 41 trials (4999 participants) met the inclusion criteria of this review. In this update, we added four trials to the 37 trials included in the first published review version. Thirty trials were published over 20 years ago. Only one trial used adequate methods of randomization and allocation concealment, was blinded, and analysed all randomized participants. Only one trial used an E histolytica stool antigen test, and two trials used amoebic culture.Tinidazole may be more effective than metronidazole for reducing clinical failure (RR 0.28, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.51; 477 participants, eight trials; low-certainty evidence) and is probably associated with fewer adverse events (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.92; 477 participants, 8 trials; moderate-certainty evidence). Compared with metronidazole, combination therapy may result in fewer parasitological failures (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.86; 720 participants, 3 trials; low-certainty evidence), but we are uncertain which combination is more effective than another. Evidence is insufficient to allow conclusions regarding the efficacy of other antiamoebic drugs.Authors' conclusionsCompared with metronidazole, tinidazole may be more effective in reducing clinical failure and may be associated with fewer adverse events. Combination drug therapy may be more effective for reducing parasitological failure compared with metronidazole alone. However, these results are based mostly on small trials conducted over 20 years ago with a variety of poorly defined outcomes. Tests that detect E histolytica more accurately are needed, particularly in countries where concomitant infection with other bacteria and parasites is common.

Project description:UnlabelledLong-term persistence with anti-osteoporosis drugs and determinants for discontinuation among fracture patients were examined. Persistence was 75.0 and 45.3 % after 1 and 5 years, respectively. Those aged ≥80 years were at increased risk of early discontinuation. Within 1 year after discontinuation, 24.3 % restarted therapy, yet 47.0 % persisted for 1 year.IntroductionThe risk of osteoporotic fracture can effectively be reduced with use of anti-osteoporosis drugs. However, little is known about persistence with these drugs after fracture where subsequent fracture risk is high. The aims were to determine long-term persistence with anti-osteoporosis drugs among fracture patients, including its determinants, and to describe restart and subsequent persistence.MethodsA cohort study was conducted within the Dutch PHARMO Database Network. Patients aged ≥50 years (n = 961) who received anti-osteoporosis drugs within 1 year after fracture, but not in the preceding year, were included (2002-2011). Persistence (defined as the proportion on treatment) and the proportion restarting after discontinuation were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analyses. Time-dependent Cox regression was used to identify determinants of non-persistence including age, sex, initial dosage regime, fracture type, comorbidities, and drug use.ResultsPersistence with anti-osteoporosis drugs was 75.0 % (95 % confidence interval (CI) 72.0-77.7) and 45.3 % (95 % CI 40.4-50.0) after 1 and 5 years, respectively. A significant determinant of non-persistence was age ≥80 years (reference 50-59 years: adjusted hazard ratio [adj. HR] 1.65; 95 % CI 1.15-2.38). This effect was not constant over time (≤360 days following initiation: adj. HR 2.07; 95 % CI 1.27-3.37; >360 days: adj. HR 1.08; 95 % CI 0.62-1.88). Within 1 year after discontinuation, 24.3 % (95 % CI 20.1-29.2) restarted therapy, yet 47.0 % persisted for 1 year.ConclusionsThis study identified suboptimal persistence with anti-osteoporosis drugs among fracture patients. Major target groups for measures aimed to improve persistence may be those aged >80 years and those restarting therapy.

Project description:Background and aimsVaccines are the first line of defense against coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19). However, the antiviral drugs provide a new tool to fight the Covid-19 pandemic. Here we aimed for a comparative evaluation of authorized drugs for treating Covid-19 patients.MethodsWe searched in PubMed and Google Scholar using keywords and terms such as Covid, SARS-CoV-2, Coronavirus disease 2019, therapeutic management, hospitalized Covid-19 patients, Covid-19 treatment. We also gathered information from reputed newspapers, web portals, and websites. We thoroughly observed, screened, and included the studies relevant to our inclusion criteria. We included only the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authorized drugs for this review.ResultsWe found that molnupiravir and paxlovid are available for oral use, and remdesivir is for only hospitalized patients. Paxlovid is a combination of nirmatrelvir and ritonavir, nirmatrelvir is a protease inhibitor (ritonavir increases the concentration of nirmatrelvir), and the other two (remdesivir and molnupiravir) are nucleoside analog prodrugs. Remdesivir and molnupiravir doses do not need to adjust in renal and hepatic impairment. However, the paxlovid dose adjustment is required for mild to moderate renal or hepatic impaired patients. Also, the drug is not allowed for Covid-19 patients with severe renal or hepatic impairment. Preliminary studies showed oral antiviral drugs significantly reduce hospitalization or death among mild to severe patients. Moreover, the US FDA has approved four monoclonal antibodies for Covid-19 treatment. Studies suggest that these drugs would reduce the risk of hospitalization or severity of symptoms. World Health Organization strongly recommended the use of corticosteroids along with other antiviral drugs for severe or critically hospitalized patients.ConclusionAll authorized drugs are effective in inhibiting viral replication for most SARS-CoV-2 variants. Therefore, along with vaccines, these drugs might potentially aid in fighting the Covid-19 pandemic.

Project description:ObjectivePostmenopausal osteoporosis (PMOP) is a common age-associated disease in the life course. Clinically, Xiaozeng Qianggu Tablets (XQT) have a potent therapeutic effect on the PMOP. However, the bioactive components and the mechanism of XQT underlying the PMOP treatment were unclear and it should be explored to discover the scientific connotation in traditional medical practice.MethodsThe components in XQT were identified by UPLC-Q-TOF/MS. The animal model of PMOP was established by surgical ovariectomy in the female Sprague-Dawley rats. After treatment of XQT, the therapeutic effect was assessed by the determination of bone metabolism biomarkers in serum and histopathological examination. The effect of XQT on the autophagy and bone micro-situation were tested using western blot, RT-qPCR, and transmission electron microscope.ResultsThere were 27 compounds identified in XQT, including catalpol, monotropein, verbascoside, cryptochlorogenic acid, 5,7-dihydroxychromone 7-rutinoside, biorobin, and so on. The bone metabolism markers (alkaline phosphatase, bone alkaline phosphatase, procollagen type I intact N-terminal propeptide, cross-linked carboxy-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen, and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase) were significantly increased in the PMOP rats and reversed by XQT administration. Moreover, the width of bone trabeculae and the ratio of the area of calcium deposition to bone trabeculae were also improved after treating the middle dose of XQT. Meanwhile, the bone micro-structure was improved by XQT. The mRNA and protein expression of unc-51 like kinase 1, beclin-1, and microtubule-associated protein 1B-light chain 3 in PMOP rats were down-regulated and up-regulated by XQT administration.ConclusionsThe compounds in XQT, including catalpol, monotropein, verbascoside cryptochlorogenic acid, and so on, were valuable for further pharmacy evaluation. The pathological changes and bone micro-structure were improved by XQT, and the down-regulated autophagy level was also restored, which suggested a potent effect of XQT on treating PMOP, corresponding to its clinic use.

Dataset Information

Development of epimedin A complex drugs for treating the osteoporosis.

Publications

Development of epimedin A complex drugs for treating the osteoporosis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets