Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Use of percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty in atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.


ABSTRACT:

Objective

For patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (ARAS), the role of percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty (PTRA) remains inconclusive. This study aimed to comparatively evaluate the benefits of best medical therapy (BMT) plus PTRA and BMT alone in treating ARAS.

Methods

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis, and searched for all randomized, controlled trials that reported patients with ARAS. The effectiveness and safety in the BMT plus PTRA and BMT alone groups were estimated, taking into account hypertension, stroke, renal events, cardiac events, and mortality.

Results

Nine randomized, controlled trials involving 2309 patients were included. In the BMT plus PTRA group, the incidence of refractory hypertension was significantly lower compared with that in the BMT alone group (odds ratio 0.09; 95% confidence interval 0.01, 0.70). However, there were no significant differences in the rates of stroke, renal events, cardiac events, cardiac mortality, and all-cause mortality between the two groups.

Conclusions

PTRA plus BMT improves blood pressure in patients with ARAS, but there is insufficient evidence for this therapy in improving stroke, renal events, cardiac events, and cardiac and all-cause mortality.

SUBMITTER: Chen Y 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7841243 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Use of percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty in atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chen Yonghui Y   Pan Hongrui H   Luo Guangze G   Li Peng P   Dai Xiangchen X  

The Journal of international medical research 20210101 1


<h4>Objective</h4>For patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (ARAS), the role of percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty (PTRA) remains inconclusive. This study aimed to comparatively evaluate the benefits of best medical therapy (BMT) plus PTRA and BMT alone in treating ARAS.<h4>Methods</h4>We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis, and searched for all randomized, controlled trials that reported patients with ARAS. The effectiveness and safety in the BMT plus PTRA and  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC6262156 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC7788676 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6135029 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4815927 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5892221 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC7302343 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7560869 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3358992 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3853687 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5399381 | biostudies-literature