Dataset Information

The influence of near-field fluxes on seasonal carbon dioxide enhancements: results from the Indianapolis Flux Experiment (INFLUX).

ABSTRACT:

Background

Networks of tower-based CO₂ mole fraction sensors have been deployed by various groups in and around cities across the world to quantify anthropogenic CO₂ emissions from metropolitan areas. A critical aspect in these approaches is the separation of atmospheric signatures from distant sources and sinks (i.e., the background) from local emissions and biogenic fluxes. We examined CO₂ enhancements compared to forested and agricultural background towers in Indianapolis, Indiana, USA, as a function of season and compared them to modeled results, as a part of the Indianapolis Flux (INFLUX) project.

Results

At the INFLUX urban tower sites, daytime growing season enhancement on a monthly timescale was up to 4.3-6.5 ppm, 2.6 times as large as those in the dormant season, on average. The enhancement differed significantly depending on choice of background and time of year, being 2.8 ppm higher in June and 1.8 ppm lower in August using a forested background tower compared to an agricultural background tower. A prediction based on land cover and observed CO₂ fluxes showed that differences in phenology and drawdown intensities drove measured differences in enhancements. Forward modelled CO₂ enhancements using fossil fuel and biogenic fluxes indicated growing season model-data mismatch of 1.1?±?1.7 ppm for the agricultural background and 2.1?±?0.5 ppm for the forested background, corresponding to 25-29% of the modelled CO₂ enhancements. The model-data total CO₂ mismatch during the dormant season was low, - 0.1?±?0.5 ppm.

Conclusions

Because growing season biogenic fluxes at the background towers are large, the urban enhancements must be disentangled from the biogenic signal, and growing season increases in CO₂ enhancement could be misinterpreted as increased anthropogenic fluxes if the background ecosystem CO₂ drawdown is not considered. The magnitude and timing of enhancements depend on the land cover type and net fluxes surrounding each background tower, so a simple box model is not appropriate for interpretation of these data. Quantification of the seasonality and magnitude of the biological fluxes in the study region using high-resolution and detailed biogenic models is necessary for the interpretation of tower-based urban CO₂ networks for cities with significant vegetation.

SUBMITTER: Miles NL

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7847578 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The influence of near-field fluxes on seasonal carbon dioxide enhancements: results from the Indianapolis Flux Experiment (INFLUX).

Miles Natasha L NL Davis Kenneth J KJ Richardson Scott J SJ Lauvaux Thomas T Martins Douglas K DK Deng A J AJ Balashov Nikolay N Gurney Kevin R KR Liang Jianming J Roest Geoff G Wang Jonathan A JA Turnbull Jocelyn C JC

Carbon balance and management 20210130 1

<h4>Background</h4>Networks of tower-based CO<sub>2</sub> mole fraction sensors have been deployed by various groups in and around cities across the world to quantify anthropogenic CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from metropolitan areas. A critical aspect in these approaches is the separation of atmospheric signatures from distant sources and sinks (i.e., the background) from local emissions and biogenic fluxes. We examined CO<sub>2</sub> enhancements compared to forested and agricultural background to ...[more]

PMID: 33515367

Similar Datasets

Project description:Though citizen science programs have been broadly successful in diverse scientific fields, their adoption has lagged in some disciplines, including soil science and ecosystem ecology. Collaborations with citizen scientists may be viewed as a conundrum in these disciplines, which often require substantial labor and technical experience; citizen scientists could improve sampling capacity but may reduce sample quality or require training and oversight prior to and while performing specialized tasks. To demonstrate the feasibility of incorporating citizen scientists into soil biogeochemistry research, we conducted a proof-of-concept study in high-elevation meadows of the Sierra Nevada in California. A collaboration between university researchers and citizen scientists allowed us to assess spatial and diel patterns of soil greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes with an intensity and frequency that would otherwise be beyond the capacity of a typical research laboratory. This collaboration with citizen scientists increased our sampling intensity by over 700% while only doubling the sampling error relative to that of full-time researchers. With training and support from project scientists, citizen scientists collected data that demonstrate spatial independence of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide at scales between 1 m and 175 m. Additionally, we found a lack of temporal variation over a 24-h period for all three GHGs. Citizen scientists participating in this one-day event reported levels of satisfaction commensurate with longer-term, immersive campaigns. The place-based event also proved an effective tool for teaching intangible concepts of soil biogeochemistry and promoting local conservation. Despite perceived barriers to entry, this study demonstrates the mutual benefits of citizen science collaborations in soil science and ecosystem ecology, encouraging adoption by disciplines that have been slow to take advantage of such collaborations. Short-term, local citizen science events can provide meaningful experiences for area residents and teach global biogeochemical cycles in a place-based context.

Dataset Information

The influence of near-field fluxes on seasonal carbon dioxide enhancements: results from the Indianapolis Flux Experiment (INFLUX).

Background

Results

Conclusions

Publications

The influence of near-field fluxes on seasonal carbon dioxide enhancements: results from the Indianapolis Flux Experiment (INFLUX).

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets