Dataset Information

Evaluation of urine concentrations of amoxicillin and clavulanate in cats.

ABSTRACT:

Background

To characterize urinary isolates, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) uses an amoxicillin breakpoint for cats based on plasma (not urine) drug concentrations (?0.25??g/mL), but a urine-specific breakpoint for dogs exists (?8??g/mL).

Objectives

To measure urine concentrations of amoxicillin and clavulanate after PO administration of amoxicillin-clavulanate to cats, and to suggest updated urine-specific susceptibility breakpoints for PO amoxicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanate in cats.

Animals

Eleven healthy purpose-bred cats.

Methods

Cats were given 3 62.5?mg doses of amoxicillin-clavulanate PO q12h. After the third dose, urine was collected over 28?hours, recording urination time and volume. At least 3 urine samples were collected per cat. Liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry was used to determine the urine concentrations of amoxicillin and clavulanate.

Results

Amoxicillin concentrations were >8??g/mL in all urine samples collected within 12?hours after administration (range, 31.6-1351??g/mL), with means of 929??g/mL (0-6?hours) and 532??g/mL (6-12?hours). The mean half-life of amoxicillin in urine was 1.99?hours, and mean recovery was 30%. Clavulanate was detected in all urine samples, with mean half-life of 2.17?hours.

Conclusions and clinical importance

Orally administered amoxicillin-clavulanate resulted in urine amoxicillin concentrations above the cutoff (8??g/mL) for wild-type Escherichia coli in all cats. Because urine-specific susceptibility testing breakpoints can be determined using urine concentrations, this information should allow new CLSI uropathogen susceptibility breakpoints for amoxicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanate in healthy cats, increasing the urine breakpoint from ?0.25 to ?8??g/mL.

SUBMITTER: KuKanich K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7848311 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Evaluation of urine concentrations of amoxicillin and clavulanate in cats.

KuKanich Kate K Woodruff Kallie K Bieberly Zackery Z Papich Mark G MG KuKanich Butch B

Journal of veterinary internal medicine 20201206 1

<h4>Background</h4>To characterize urinary isolates, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) uses an amoxicillin breakpoint for cats based on plasma (not urine) drug concentrations (≤0.25 μg/mL), but a urine-specific breakpoint for dogs exists (≤8 μg/mL).<h4>Objectives</h4>To measure urine concentrations of amoxicillin and clavulanate after PO administration of amoxicillin-clavulanate to cats, and to suggest updated urine-specific susceptibility breakpoints for PO amoxicillin and ...[more]

PMID: 33280171

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundBuruli ulcer (BU) is a skin neglected tropical disease (NTD) caused by Mycobacterium ulcerans. WHO-recommended treatment requires 8-weeks of daily rifampicin (RIF) and clarithromycin (CLA) with wound care. Treatment compliance may be challenging due to socioeconomic determinants. Previous minimum Inhibitory Concentration and checkerboard assays showed that amoxicillin/clavulanate (AMX/CLV) combined with RIF+CLA were synergistic against M. ulcerans. However, in vitro time kill assays (TKA) are a better approach to understand the antimicrobial activity of a drug over time. Colony forming units (CFU) enumeration is the in vitro reference method to measure bacterial load, although this is a time-consuming method due to the slow growth of M. ulcerans. The aim of this study was to assess the in vitro activity of RIF, CLA and AMX/CLV combinations against M. ulcerans clinical isolates by TKA, while comparing four methodologies: CFU enumeration, luminescence by relative light unit (RLU) and optical density (at 600 nm) measurements, and 16S rRNA/IS2404 genes quantification.Methodology/principal findingsTKA of RIF, CLA and AMX/CLV alone and in combination were performed against different M. ulcerans clinical isolates. Bacterial loads were quantified with different methodologies after 1, 3, 7, 10, 14, 21 and 28 days of treatment. RIF+AMX/CLV and the triple RIF+CLA+AMX/CLV combinations were bactericidal and more effective in vitro than the currently used RIF+CLA combination to treat BU. All methodologies except IS2404 quantitative PCR provided similar results with a good correlation with CFU enumeration. Measuring luminescence (RLU) was the most cost-effective methodology to quantify M. ulcerans bacterial loads in in vitro TKA.Conclusions/significanceOur study suggests that alternative and faster TKA methodologies can be used in BU research instead of the cumbersome CFU quantification method. These results provide an in vitro microbiological support to of the BLMs4BU clinical trial (NCT05169554, PACTR202209521256638) to shorten BU treatment.

Project description:ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of amoxicillin-clavulanate versus amoxicillin for adults diagnosed with acute sinusitis (AS). A secondary objective compared antibiotic effectiveness in patients meeting risk criteria for treatment failure.MethodsA retrospective cohort study of adults diagnosed with AS prescribed amoxicillin ± clavulanate within Veterans Affairs emergency departments from 2012-2019 was conducted. The primary outcome was sinusitis-related return visits for amoxicillin versus amoxicillin-clavulanate. Secondary outcomes included 30-day infectious complications, gastrointestinal-related adverse events (AEs), and hospitalizations. Propensity-score matching and logistic regression models adjusted for potential confounders.ResultsA total of 89,627 AS patient visits were identified: 18,576 prescribed amoxicillin and 71,051 amoxicillin-clavulanate. Most patients were male (75,604; 84.4%) and afebrile (80,624; 91.7%). The propensity score-matched cohort comprised 17,929 amoxicillin and 42,294 amoxicillin-clavulanate patient visits. There was no difference in sinusitis-related return visits between amoxicillin (4.9%) and amoxicillin-clavulanate (5.1%) (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88, 1.04; P = 0.317). Infectious complications (amoxicillin [0.3%] vs amoxicillin-clavulanate [0.4%]); (adjusted OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.57, 1.07; P = 0.124) and hospitalization (amoxicillin [2.0%] vs amoxicillin-clavulanate [2.4%]); (adjusted OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.81, 1.04; P = 0.173) were not different. Gastrointestinal-related AEs were lower with amoxicillin (0.5%) relative to amoxicillin-clavulanate (0.7%); (adjusted OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.53, 0.86; P = 0.002). Comorbidity was the only guideline-recommended risk factor that was a significant predictor of infectious complications with respect to treatment (amoxicillin vs amoxicillin-clavulanate, OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.94; P = 0.022).ConclusionAmoxicillin demonstrated similar efficacy to amoxicillin-clavulanate for AS with fewer gastrointestinal-related AEs. Amoxicillin is a viable option in adults with AS meeting criteria for antibiotic therapy.

Project description:ImportancePeripheral neuropathy has been associated with systemic fluoroquinolone exposure, but risk has been poorly quantified.ObjectiveTo calculate relative and absolute risk estimates for the association of fluoroquinolone exposure with peripheral neuropathy and to examine how risk may be affected by timing of fluoroquinolone exposure and by other risk factors.Design, setting, and participantsThis nested case-control study used anonymized data from all patients routinely registered with general practices in The Health Improvement Network database, a large primary care population database in the United Kingdom, from January 1, 1999, to December 31, 2015. Data analyses were conducted January 8, 2018. The cohort consisted of 1 338 900 adults issued 1 or more prescriptions of fluoroquinolone (34.3%) or amoxicillin-clavulanate (65.7%) antibiotics. Adults with incident peripheral neuropathy were matched (on age, sex, general practice, and calendar time) with up to 4 controls by using incidence density sampling selected from a cohort prescribed oral fluoroquinolone or amoxicillin-clavulanate antibiotics. Incidence rate ratios of peripheral neuropathy were calculated for fluoroquinolone and for amoxicillin-clavulanate exposure and compared with nonexposure among patients without diabetes, with sensitivity analyses testing the consistency of the results. Population mean-adjusted rate differences were then estimated, including the number needed to harm for various durations of fluoroquinolone therapy.ExposuresCurrent and cumulative exposure to oral fluoroquinolone or amoxicillin-clavulanate antibiotics.Main outcomes and measuresIncident peripheral neuropathy cases recorded in electronic medical records.ResultsIn total, 5357 patients with incident peripheral neuropathy (mean [SD] age, 65.6 [14.7] years; 2809 women [52.4%]) were matched to 17 285 controls (mean [SD] age, 64.4 [15.2] years; 9485 women [54.9%]) without diabetes. Current oral fluoroquinolone exposure was associated with an increased relative incidence of peripheral neuropathy compared with nonexposure (adjusted incident rate ratio, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.13-1.92). Risk increased by approximately 3% for each additional day of current fluoroquinolone exposure and persisted for up to 180 days following exposure. No significant increased risk was observed with oral amoxicillin-clavulanate exposure. The absolute risk with current oral fluoroquinolone exposure was 2.4 (95% CI, 1.8-3.1) per 10 000 patients per year of current use. The number needed to harm for a 10-day course was 152 083 patients (95% CI, 117 742-202 778) and was greatest among men and among patients older than 60 years.Conclusions and relevanceThe results of the present study suggested that oral fluoroquinolone therapy was associated with an increased risk of incident peripheral neuropathy that may depend on the timing of the exposure and the cumulative dose. Health care professionals should consider these potential risks when prescribing fluoroquinolone antibiotics.

Project description:Resistance to amoxicillin-clavulanate, a widely used beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination antibiotic, is rising globally, and yet susceptibility testing remains challenging. To test whether whole-genome sequencing (WGS) could provide a more reliable assessment of susceptibility than traditional methods, we predicted resistance from WGS for 976 Escherichia coli bloodstream infection isolates from Oxfordshire, United Kingdom, comparing against phenotypes from the BD Phoenix (calibrated against EUCAST guidelines). A total of 339/976 (35%) isolates were amoxicillin-clavulanate resistant. Predictions based solely on beta-lactamase presence/absence performed poorly (sensitivity, 23% [78/339]) but improved when genetic features associated with penicillinase hyperproduction (e.g., promoter mutations and copy number estimates) were considered (sensitivity, 82% [277/339]; P < 0.0001). Most discrepancies occurred in isolates with MICs within ±1 doubling dilution of the breakpoint. We investigated two potential causes: the phenotypic reference and the binary resistant/susceptible classification. We performed reference standard, replicated phenotyping in a random stratified subsample of 261/976 (27%) isolates using agar dilution, following both EUCAST and CLSI guidelines, which use different clavulanate concentrations. As well as disagreeing with each other, neither agar dilution phenotype aligned perfectly with genetic features. A random-effects model investigating associations between genetic features and MICs showed that some genetic features had small, variable and additive effects, resulting in variable resistance classification. Using model fixed-effects to predict MICs for the non-agar dilution isolates, predicted MICs were in essential agreement (±1 doubling dilution) with observed (BD Phoenix) MICs for 691/715 (97%) isolates. This suggests amoxicillin-clavulanate resistance in E. coli is quantitative, rather than qualitative, explaining the poorly reproducible binary (resistant/susceptible) phenotypes and suboptimal concordance between different phenotypic methods and with WGS-based predictions.

Dataset Information

Evaluation of urine concentrations of amoxicillin and clavulanate in cats.

Background

Objectives

Animals

Methods

Results

Conclusions and clinical importance

Publications

Evaluation of urine concentrations of amoxicillin and clavulanate in cats.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets