Early anterior detachment of the adenoma: a novel approach for en bloc thulium laser enucleation of the prostate.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Saredi G
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7848832 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundTo evaluate preoperative predictors of enucleation time during en bloc 'no-touch' holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) METHODS: We enrolled 135 patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) treated with en bloc 'no-touch' HoLEP from July 2017 to March 2019 by a single surgeon. Preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative clinical variables were examined. Stepwise linear regression was performed to determine clinical variables associated with enucleation times.ResultThe average (range) enucleation time was 46.1 (12-220) minutes, and the overall operation time was 71 (18-250) minutes. History of antiplatelet agents, history of urinary tract infection (UTI), and increasing specimen weight were each significantly associated with increasing enucleation time. No category IV complications were recorded, and all complications were evenly distributed among the groups according to the HoLEP specimen weight.ConclusionEn bloc 'no-touch' HoLEP was found to be an efficient and reproducible surgical method for treating BPH. Prostatic gland size was significantly associated with increased enucleation times. Similarly, history of UTI and antiplatelet agents were correlated with increased operative time.
| S-EPMC7661272 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is a new alternative method for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH); however, most surgeons are hesitant to use this new technique due to its steep learning curve. Notably, most beginners start with the traditional multi-incisional method rather than the en bloc method. Thus, we sought to explore the feasibility of beginners adopting the en bloc method in HoLEP. Methods A clinical development project was established at Department of Urology, Affiliated Nantong Rehabilitation Hospital of Nantong University in December 2019 to promote HoLEP. The study included 1st 132 consecutive patients treated by a single surgeon between January and December 2020. The overall pre-, peri-, and post-operative metrics were documented and evaluated. The 132 patients were divided into Group A (1st 50 patients) and Group B (the following 82 patients), and these two groups were compared to each other. Results No conversion of operative methods occurred. The major significant differences between Groups A and B related to the enucleation time and enucleation efficiency. We found that 20–30 procedures needed to be performed for the surgeon to become relatively comfortable with the en bloc method. Further, skill improvement was continuous but tended to stabilize with case accumulation. The main short-term complications observed in the hospital and 30 days post-operatively included acute urinary retention, urinary tract infection, transient incontinence, and gross hematuria. In the 18-month follow-up period, the complications consisted of urethral stricture and bladder-neck contracture, which required endoscopic urethrotomy or bladder-neck incisions. Conclusions The en bloc HoLEP provided a significantly improved voiding with low complications and recurrence, and this technique could feasibly be adopted to teach beginners.
| S-EPMC10080358 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC8318026 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundTo assess the educational value of YouTube surgical videos of thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP).MethodsA comprehensive search of "ThuLEP" or "thulium laser enucleation of the prostate" was performed on YouTube on October 31, 2020. According to the LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS, we created a checklist to assess the educational value of these videos. The checklist included 20 options. Each option represented one point. The total score was the sum of all the points. The higher score represents the higher educational value.ResultsA total of 70 videos were included. The average number of views were 1,366 (range, 11-30,884). The mean video length was 16.59 mins (range, 1.20-70.35 mins). Only 22.9% (16/70) videos had audio or/and written commentary in English language. Although 67.4% (47/70) videos were present step by step, only 21.4% (15/70) videos did the detailed explanation of critical steps. The mean score of the videos was 5.5 points (range, 1-15). No videos met all the points of the checklist. The mean percentage conformity of the videos was 28% (range, 5-75%). The educational score of the videos had no significant positive correlation with the number of views.ConclusionsThe majority of ThuLEP videos on YouTube platform have low educational value. Videos often lack important and detailed explanations about surgical procedures. The ThuLEP learner should watch these videos selectively. These findings remind us that a global effort should be made to improve the educational value of YouTube surgical videos, and more reporting guidelines about urological endoscopic surgery are still needed.
| S-EPMC8350234 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The thulium laser is the most recently introduced technology for the surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Until recently, most thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP) was performed by use of the three-lobe technique. We introduce a novel one-lobe enucleation technique for ThuLEP called the "All-in-One" technique. We report our initial experiences here.From June 2013 to May 2014, a total of 47 patients underwent the All-in-One technique of ThuLEP for symptomatic BPH performed by a single surgeon. All patients were assessed with the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), transrectal ultrasonography, serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), maximal urine flow rate (Qmax), and postvoid residual urine volume (PVR) before and 1 month after surgery. We reassessed IPSS, Qmax, and PVR 3 months after surgery. To assess the efficacy of the All-in-One technique, we checked the PSA reduction ratio, transitional zone volume reduction ratio, and enucleation failure rate.The mean operative time was 82.1±33.3 minutes. The mean enucleation time and morcellation time were 52.7±21.7 minutes and 8.2±7.0 minutes, respectively. The mean resected tissue weight and decrease in hemoglobin were 36.9±24.6 g and 0.4±0.8 g/dL, respectively. All perioperative parameters showed significant improvement (p<0.05). No major complications were observed. The PSA reduction ratio, transitional zone volume reduction ratio, and enucleation failure rate were 0.81, 0.92, and 4.3%, respectively.The All-in-One technique of ThuLEP showed efficacy and effectiveness comparable to that of other techniques. We expect that this new technique could reduce the operation time and the bleeding and improve the effectiveness of enucleation.
| S-EPMC4643173 | biostudies-other
Project description:BACKGROUND:The efficacy of thulium laser prostate enucleation (ThuLEP) for large prostates is unclear. This study aimed to explore the expanded utility of 150-200-W ThuLEP by studying patients with a large prostate (>?80?mL). METHODS:We retrospectively reviewed records of 125 patients with large prostate glands (>?80?mL) who underwent ThuLEP performed by a single surgeon from June 2012 to June 2016. The ThuLEP data from our previous pilot study were used as the control. Operative variables, patient profiles, preoperative and postoperative urine flow rates, prostate volume, and the international prostate symptom score (IPSS) were recorded and analyzed using Student's t-test, the z-test, and logistic regression analysis. RESULTS:Of 366 patients who underwent ThuLEP, 125 (34.15%) were enrolled. The ages and estimated prostate volumes were compared with those of the control. Overall, 39.2% underwent Foley placement and 4% received an anticoagulant agent preoperatively. Maximum urinary flow rates before and 3 and 12?months postoperatively were 9.93, 23.20, and 19.00?mL/s, respectively, which were generally equal to those of the control groups (P =?0.68, 0.18, 0.98, respectively). Preoperative and postoperative IPSSs were 27.09 and 7.35, respectively. The postoperative prostate-specific antigen was reduced by 85.59% in comparison to the preoperative level. The estimated prostate size was reduced by 74.17% postoperatively. The modified Clavien-Dindo classification system was used to identify the overall rate of complications, which was approximately 22.4%. The mortality rate was 0.8%. CONCLUSIONS:High-power ThuLEP is safe and effective for patients with large prostate glands (>?80?mL). Prostate enucleation using a high-power thulium laser is feasible for patients who exhibit contraindications for surgery.
| S-EPMC6341629 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Open resection of a large lipoma requires a large incision that may result in disfigurement from the scar. Endoscopic resection of the lipoma can have better cosmetic results. However, piecemeal removal of the lipoma has the disadvantage of fragmentation of the tumor before it can be determined whether it is benign or malignant. In this Technical Note, the technical details of endoscopically assisted en bloc resection of an anterior knee lipoma are described. This can provide a whole-block specimen for histologic examination.
| S-EPMC8252843 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) has been accepted as the most efficient method of transurethral surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia. The originally developed three-lobe technique has popularized this surgery; this method is based on three longitudinal incisions, by which the median lobe is removed, and subsequently, both lateral lobes are enucleated. To maintain a consistent surgical plane and to minimize sphincteric damage, the traditional three-lobe technique is continuously being refined and evolving. A few modifications of the original technique have been developed, and several en bloc enucleation methods have been introduced. However, more clinical evidence is required to show the superiority of newer techniques over the original three-lobe technique in terms of efficacy and long-term side effects. To date, none of the newer techniques have been accepted as a standard technique for HoLEP.
| S-EPMC6722407 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) for extremely large prostates.Materials and methodsPatients undergoing HoLEP between July 2008 and December 2013 from the Seoul National University Hospital Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Database Registry were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into three groups according to their total prostate volume (TPV): group A (TPV<100 mL), group B (100 mL≤TPV<200 mL), and group C (TPV≥200 mL); the clinical data of the three groups were compared. All patients were followed up 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery.ResultsA total of 502 patients (group A, 426; group B, 70; group C, 6) with a mean age of 69.0 (standard deviation, ±7.3) years were included in our analysis. The mean prostate volume and prostate-specific antigen level were 68.7±36.9 mL and 4.15±4.24 ng/mL, respectively. The enucleation and morcellation times were longer in group C (p<0.001), and the enucleation efficacy was higher in this group (p<0.001, R(2)=0.399). Moreover, the mean postoperative catheterization and hospitalization periods were significantly longer in group C (p=0.004 and p=0.011, respectively). However, there were no significant differences between the groups in any other postoperative events, including recatheterization, reoperation, urinary tract infection, clot retention, and bladder neck contracture (p range, 0.516-0.913). One patient in group C experienced recurrence of the urethral stricture.ConclusionsHoLEP in patients with an extremely large prostate can be performed efficiently and safely.
| S-EPMC4355433 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background: Urethral fibroepithelial polyps (FEPs) are scarce benign mesodermal tumors arising mainly from the posterior urethra in boys. FEPs are rarely reported in girls. There is no consensus regarding their etiology; however, some authors attribute their presence to abnormal mesodermal involution. FEPs have different clinical presentations, including acute urinary retention (AUR), difficult micturition, hematuria, and recurrent urinary tract infection in addition to interlabial mass in girls. Radiologic studies are usually insufficient for diagnosis. Cystourethroscopy and histopathologic examination are considered the diagnostic tool of choice. In this report, we introduce Holmium Laser En Bloc Resection of Urethral Polyp (HoLERUP) as an alternative technique to conventional and en bloc electric resection. Case Presentation: Three boys with benign urethral polyps (UPs) presented with AUR, difficult micturition, and hematuria. The diagnosis of UP was confirmed by means of cystourethroscopy. HoLERUP was carried out for all three of them and histopathologic examination revealed FEP in two cases and an inflammatory polyp in the third. Conclusion: UPs should be considered in the differential diagnosis of children presenting with AUR, difficult micturition, and hematuria. HoLERUP overcomes the limitations of conventional resection and can be performed when en bloc electric resection is not feasible.
| S-EPMC7803242 | biostudies-literature