Dataset Information

No Butts on the Beach: Aquatic Toxicity of Cigarette Butt Leachate Chemicals.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

Toxic pollutants leaching from littered cigarette butts (CB) raise environmental impact concerns. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is required to assess the environmental impacts of its tobacco regulatory actions per the US National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).

Methods

We determined the chemical constituents in CB leachate through analyses of 109 field-collected CB and literature compilation and characterized their ecotoxicity to aquatic organisms.

Results

One-third of the 98 identified CB leachate chemicals were very toxic and 10% were toxic to aquatic organisms due to acute and chronic toxicity. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, metals, phthalates, nicotine and volatile organic compounds were the most hazardous CB leachate chemicals for aquatic organisms. Of the 98 CB leachate chemicals, 25 are included in FDA's list of harmful or potentially harmful constituents in tobacco products and tobacco smoke.

Conclusions

Our study quantifies CB leachate constituents, characterizes their ecological hazard and identifies chemicals of concern. Thus, it aids in evaluating the environmental impacts of tobacco products per NEPA requirements. These results provide important information for strategies to prevent and reduce CB litter (eg, awareness programs, litter laws enforcement), thereby reducing environmental hazards from CB toxicants.

SUBMITTER: Venugopal PD

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7849351 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

No Butts on the Beach: Aquatic Toxicity of Cigarette Butt Leachate Chemicals.

Venugopal P Dilip PD Hanna Shannon K SK Gagliano Gregory G GG Chang Hoshing W HW

Tobacco regulatory science 20210101 1

<h4>Objectives</h4>Toxic pollutants leaching from littered cigarette butts (CB) raise environmental impact concerns. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is required to assess the environmental impacts of its tobacco regulatory actions per the US National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).<h4>Methods</h4>We determined the chemical constituents in CB leachate through analyses of 109 field-collected CB and literature compilation and characterized their ecotoxicity to aquatic organisms.<h4>Resul ...[more]

PMID: 33532516

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionLarge-scale epidemiological surveys have frequently relied upon clinic-based sample collection to incorporate biological data, which can be costly and result in nonrepresentative data. Collecting samples in a nonclinical setting (i.e., through postal mail or at the subject's home) offers an alternative option that is minimally invasive and can be incorporated into large population-based studies.Objectives(a) To assess the feasibility of collecting biological data from a cohort of smokers in the International Tobacco Control (ITC) study, through the mail and in the home; (b) to examine whether participants are representative of the population under consideration; and (c) to evaluate how the added burden of providing biomarker samples might impact subsequent participation in a follow-up survey.MethodsParticipants were asked to provide a saliva sample and five cigarette butts from cigarettes smoked on a single day, using standardized procedures. Sample collection kits were mailed to a random sample of 400 daily cigarette smokers who were involved in the 2006 annual ITC Four Country (United Kingdom, United States, Canada, and Australia) telephone survey and agreed to participate in sample collection. A random sample of 179 daily smokers who participated in a face-to-face ITC survey in Mexico and Uruguay and agreed to participate in sample collection were also asked to provide samples.ResultsSamples were collected from 96% of invited participants in the face-to-face surveys and 52% of participants in the telephone survey. The added burden of the sample collection did not reduce survey retention rates. Participants who initially agreed to participate in the sample collection were more likely to participate in the subsequent survey than participants who were not asked or declined to participate (odds ratio [OR] = 1.28; 95% CI = 1.01-1.62, p = .021). Further, those who provided samples were also more likely to participate in the subsequent survey than those who did not (OR = 2.78; 95% CI = 1.71-4.52, p < .001).DiscussionCollecting saliva and cigarette butt samples from a group of smokers is feasible, yields a representative sample, and the added participant burden does not reduce subsequent survey response rates.

Project description:We developed a Target Plastic Model (TPM) to estimate the critical plastic burden of organic toxicants in five types of plastics, namely, polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), polyoxymethylene (POM), polyacrylate (PA), low-density polyethylene (LDPE), and polyurethane ester (PU), following the Target Lipid Model (TLM) framework. By substituting the lipid-water partition coefficient in the TLM with plastic-water partition coefficients to create TPM, we demonstrated that the biomimetic nature of these plastic phases allows for the calculation of critical plastic burdens of toxicants, similar to the notion of critical lipid burdens in TLM. Following this approach, the critical plastic burdens of baseline (n = 115), less-inert (n = 73), and reactive (n = 75) toxicants ranged from 0.17 to 51.33, 0.04 to 26.62, and 1.00 × 10-6 to 6.78 × 10-4 mmol/kg of plastic, respectively. Our study showed that PDMS, PA, POM, PE, and PU are similar to biomembranes in mimicking the passive exchange of chemicals with the water phase. Using the TPM, median lethal concentration (LC50) values for fish exposed to baseline toxicants were predicted, and the results agreed with experimental values, with RMSE ranging from 0.311 to 0.538 log unit. Similarly, for the same data set of baseline toxicants, other widely used models, including the TLM (RMSE: 0.32-0.34), ECOSAR (RMSE: 0.35), and the Abraham Solvation Model (ASM; RMSE: 0.31), demonstrated comparable agreement between experimental and predicted values. For less inert chemicals, predictions were within a factor of 5 of experimental values. Comparatively, ASM and ECOSAR showed predictions within a factor of 2 and 3, respectively. The TLM based on phospholipid had predictions within a factor of 3 and octanol within a factor of 4, indicating that the TPM's performance for less inert chemicals is comparable to these established models. Unlike these methods, the TPM requires only the knowledge of plastic bound concentration for a given plastic phase to calculate baseline toxic units, bypassing the need for extensive LC50 and plastic-water partition coefficient data, which are often limited for emerging chemicals. Taken together, the TPM can provide valuable insights into the toxicities of chemicals associated with environmental plastic phases, assisting in selecting the best polymeric phase for passive sampling and designing better passive dosing techniques for toxicity experiments.

Dataset Information

No Butts on the Beach: Aquatic Toxicity of Cigarette Butt Leachate Chemicals.

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

No Butts on the Beach: Aquatic Toxicity of Cigarette Butt Leachate Chemicals.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets