Dataset Information

Managing epidermolysis bullosa during the coronavirus pandemic: Experience and ideals.

ABSTRACT: The 2019 novel coronavirus pandemic has tremendously affected health-seeking behaviors. Fear of contracting the disease has been a major factor keeping patients from presenting to hospitals, even when urgent or emergent medical attention is needed. Hospitals limiting staff exposure and capacity to accommodate patients also limits opportunities to seek care. Although physical distancing is encouraged to curb infections, this call needs to be tempered with public health education for what constitutes emergencies and urgent medical conditions needing face-to-face attention. Measures to assuage fears among patients and their caregivers to ensure their safety in the hospital or health care setting need to be communicated and executed effectively. Epidermolysis bullosa is an inherited mechanobullous disorder that is usually stable, but in some patients with underlying comorbidities, close monitoring or face-to-face management is required . We present our experience and provide recommendations pertinent to epidermolysis bullosa patients of all subtypes during the coronavirus crisis.

SUBMITTER: Ramirez-Quizon M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7849544 | biostudies-literature | 2021 May-Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Managing epidermolysis bullosa during the coronavirus pandemic: Experience and ideals.

Ramirez-Quizon Mae M Murrell Dédée F DF

Clinics in dermatology 20210201 3

The 2019 novel coronavirus pandemic has tremendously affected health-seeking behaviors. Fear of contracting the disease has been a major factor keeping patients from presenting to hospitals, even when urgent or emergent medical attention is needed. Hospitals limiting staff exposure and capacity to accommodate patients also limits opportunities to seek care. Although physical distancing is encouraged to curb infections, this call needs to be tempered with public health education for what constitu ...[more]

PMID: 34517994

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundLittle information is available regarding the burden of living with and managing epidermolysis bullosa, including the distinct challenges faced by patients with different disease types/subtypes.MethodsA 90-question/item survey was developed to collect demographics, diagnostic data, management practices, and burden of illness information for patients with epidermolysis bullosa living in the United States. Recruitment was conducted via email and social media in partnership with epidermolysis bullosa patient advocacy organizations in the United States, and the survey was conducted via telephone interview by a third-party health research firm. Respondents aged ≥ 18 years with a confirmed diagnosis of epidermolysis bullosa or caring for a patient with a confirmed diagnosis of epidermolysis bullosa were eligible to participate in the survey.ResultsIn total, 156 responses were received from patients (n = 63) and caregivers (n = 93) representing the epidermolysis bullosa types of simplex, junctional, and dystrophic (subtypes: dominant and recessive). A large proportion of patients (21%) and caregivers (32%) reported that the condition was severe or very severe, and 19% of patients and 26% of caregivers reported a visit to an emergency department in the 12 months prior to the survey. Among the types/subtypes represented, recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa results in the greatest wound burden, with approximately 60% of patients and caregivers reporting wounds covering > 30% of total body area. Wound care is time consuming and commonly requires significant caregiver assistance. Therapeutic options are urgently needed and reducing the number and severity of wounds was generally ranked as the most important treatment factor.ConclusionsSurvey responses demonstrate that epidermolysis bullosa places a considerable burden on patients, their caregivers, and their families. The limitations caused by epidermolysis bullosa mean that both patients and caregivers must make difficult choices and compromises regarding education, career, and home life. Finally, survey results indicate that epidermolysis bullosa negatively impacts quality of life and causes financial burden to patients and their families.

Project description:BackgroundPain is common in the genetic skin fragility disorder epidermolysis bullosa (EB), from skin and mucosal injury and inflammation as well as extra-mucocutaneous sites. Individuals living with EB have identified pain as a priority for better treatments.ObjectivesThe Prospective EB Longitudinal Evaluation Study (PEBLES) is a prospective register study exploring the natural history of RDEB across all ages from birth to death. Here, we investigated the characteristics and treatment of pain in different RDEB subtypes.MethodsInformation was collected from individuals with different RDEB subtypes over an 8-year period. Data included visual analogue scale (VAS) ratings of background and procedural pain, its location, intensity and impact on sleep, as well as pain medication. Disease severity scores and quality of life measures were correlated to pain scores.ResultsSixty-one participants (13 children, 48 adults) completed a total of 361 reviews. Pain was common, experienced by 93% of participants at index review, with 80% suffering both background and procedural pain. Across all RDEB patients, the median VAS for background pain was 40 (out of 100) [interquartile range 20,60] and for those having regular dressing changes, median procedural pain was 52 [40,80]. Severe (RDEB-S) and pruriginosa (RDEB-Pru) groups had the greatest increase in procedural compared to background pain of 20 and 22 VAS points, respectively. Correlations between disease severity and quality of life impairment were observed across most groups, particularly RDEB-S. Over half of those studied experienced pain frequently or constantly, and in one third pain disturbed sleep at least 4 nights per week. Skin was the commonest source of pain in all subtypes except inversa RDEB where the mouth was the main site. Despite frequent and severe pain, one third of participants used no medication for pain and, in those that did, pain levels remained high suggesting ineffectiveness of current pain management approaches and a significant unmet need in RDEB.ConclusionThe frequency, severity, and impact of pain in all RDEB patients is significant, particularly in RDEB-S and RDEB-Pru. Our findings highlight that current RDEB pain management is poorly effective and that further research is needed to address this symptom.

Project description:ImportanceKindler epidermolysis bullosa is a genetic skin-blistering disease associated with recessive inherited pathogenic variants in FERMT1, which encodes kindlin-1. Severe orofacial manifestations of Kindler epidermolysis bullosa, including early oral squamous cell carcinoma, have been reported.ObjectiveTo determine whether hypoplastic pitted amelogenesis imperfecta is a feature of Kindler epidermolysis bullosa.Design, settings, and participantsThis longitudinal, 2-center cohort study was performed from 2003 to 2023 at the Epidermolysis Bullosa Centre, University of Freiburg, Germany, and the Special Care Dentistry Clinic, University of Chile in association with DEBRA Chile. Participants included a convenience sampling of all patients with a diagnosis of Kindler epidermolysis bullosa.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcomes were the presence of hypoplastic pitted amelogenesis imperfecta, intraoral wounds, gingivitis and periodontal disease, gingival hyperplasia, vestibular obliteration, cheilitis, angular cheilitis, chronic lip wounds, microstomia, and oral squamous cell carcinoma.ResultsThe cohort consisted of 36 patients (15 female [42%] and 21 male [58%]; mean age at first examination, 23 years [range, 2 weeks to 70 years]) with Kindler epidermolysis bullosa. The follow-up ranged from 1 to 24 years. The enamel structure was assessed in 11 patients, all of whom presented with enamel structure abnormalities. The severity of hypoplastic pitted amelogenesis imperfecta varied from generalized to localized pitting. Additional orofacial features observed include gingivitis and periodontal disease, which was present in 90% (27 of 30 patients) of those assessed, followed by intraoral lesions (16 of 22 patients [73%]), angular cheilitis (24 of 33 patients [73%]), cheilitis (22 of 34 patients [65%]), gingival overgrowth (17 of 26 patients [65%]), microstomia (14 of 25 patients [56%]), and vestibular obliteration (8 of 16 patients [50%]). Other features included chronic lip ulcers (2 patients) and oral squamous cell carcinoma with lethal outcome (2 patients).Conclusions and relevanceThese findings suggest that hypoplastic pitted amelogenesis imperfecta is a feature of Kindler epidermolysis bullosa and underscore the extent and severity of oral manifestations in Kindler epidermolysis bullosa and the need for early and sustained dental care.

Dataset Information

Managing epidermolysis bullosa during the coronavirus pandemic: Experience and ideals.

Publications

Managing epidermolysis bullosa during the coronavirus pandemic: Experience and ideals.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets