Dataset Information

Genomic analyses of glycine decarboxylase neurogenic mutations yield a large-scale prediction model for prenatal disease.

ABSTRACT: Hundreds of mutations in a single gene result in rare diseases, but why mutations induce severe or attenuated states remains poorly understood. Defect in glycine decarboxylase (GLDC) causes Non-ketotic Hyperglycinemia (NKH), a neurological disease associated with elevation of plasma glycine. We unified a human multiparametric NKH mutation scale that separates severe from attenuated neurological disease with new in silico tools for murine and human genome level-analyses, gathered in vivo evidence from mice engineered with top-ranking attenuated and a highly pathogenic mutation, and integrated the data in a model of pre- and post-natal disease outcomes, relevant for over a hundred major and minor neurogenic mutations. Our findings suggest that highly severe neurogenic mutations predict fatal, prenatal disease that can be remedied by metabolic supplementation of dams, without amelioration of persistent plasma glycine. The work also provides a systems approach to identify functional consequences of mutations across hundreds of genetic diseases. Our studies provide a new framework for a large scale understanding of mutation functions and the prediction that severity of a neurogenic mutation is a direct measure of pre-natal disease in neurometabolic NKH mouse models. This framework can be extended to analyses of hundreds of monogenetic rare disorders where the underlying genes are known but understanding of the vast majority of mutations and why and how they cause disease, has yet to be realized.

SUBMITTER: Farris J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7850488 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Genomic analyses of glycine decarboxylase neurogenic mutations yield a large-scale prediction model for prenatal disease.

Farris Joseph J Alam Md Suhail MS Rajashekara Arpitha Mysore AM Haldar Kasturi K

PLoS genetics 20210201 2

Hundreds of mutations in a single gene result in rare diseases, but why mutations induce severe or attenuated states remains poorly understood. Defect in glycine decarboxylase (GLDC) causes Non-ketotic Hyperglycinemia (NKH), a neurological disease associated with elevation of plasma glycine. We unified a human multiparametric NKH mutation scale that separates severe from attenuated neurological disease with new in silico tools for murine and human genome level-analyses, gathered in vivo evidence ...[more]

PMID: 33524012

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundFor marker effect models and genomic animal models, computational requirements increase with the number of loci and the number of genotyped individuals, respectively. In the latter case, the inverse genomic relationship matrix (GRM) is typically needed, which is computationally demanding to compute for large datasets. Thus, there is a great need for dimensionality-reduction methods that can analyze massive genomic data. For this purpose, we developed reduced-dimension singular value decomposition (SVD) based models for genomic prediction.MethodsFast SVD is performed by analyzing different chromosomes/genome segments in parallel and/or by restricting SVD to a limited core of genotyped individuals, producing chromosome- or segment-specific principal components (PC). Given a limited effective population size, nearly all the genetic variation can be effectively captured by a limited number of PC. Genomic prediction can then be performed either by PC ridge regression (PCRR) or by genomic animal models using an inverse GRM computed from the chosen PC (PCIG). In the latter case, computation of the inverse GRM will be feasible for any number of genotyped individuals and can be readily produced row- or element-wise.ResultsUsing simulated data, we show that PCRR and PCIG models, using chromosome-wise SVD of a core sample of individuals, are appropriate for genomic prediction in a larger population, and results in virtually identical predicted breeding values as the original full-dimension genomic model (r = 1.000). Compared with other algorithms (e.g. algorithm for proven and young animals, APY), the (chromosome-wise SVD-based) PCRR and PCIG models were more robust to size of the core sample, giving nearly identical results even down to 500 core individuals. The method was also successfully tested on a large multi-breed dataset.ConclusionsSVD can be used for dimensionality reduction of large genomic datasets. After SVD, genomic prediction using dense genomic data and many genotyped individuals can be done in a computationally efficient manner. Using this method, the resulting genomic estimated breeding values were virtually identical to those computed from a full-dimension genomic model.

Project description:BackgroundSingle-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP) models allow the combination of genomic, pedigree, and phenotypic data into a single model, which is computationally challenging for large genotyped populations. In practice, genotypes of animals without their own phenotype and progeny, so-called genotyped selection candidates, can become available after genomic breeding values have been estimated by ssGBLUP. In some breeding programmes, genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) for these animals should be known shortly after obtaining genotype information but recomputing GEBV using the full ssGBLUP takes too much time. In this study, first we compare two equivalent formulations of ssGBLUP models, i.e. one that is based on the Woodbury matrix identity applied to the inverse of the genomic relationship matrix, and one that is based on marker equations. Second, we present computationally-fast approaches to indirectly compute GEBV for genotyped selection candidates, without the need to do the full ssGBLUP evaluation.ResultsThe indirect approaches use information from the latest ssGBLUP evaluation and rely on the decomposition of GEBV into its components. The two equivalent ssGBLUP models and indirect approaches were tested on a six-trait calving difficulty model using Irish dairy and beef cattle data that include 2.6 million genotyped animals of which about 500,000 were considered as genotyped selection candidates. When using the same computational approaches, the solving phase of the two equivalent ssGBLUP models showed similar requirements for memory and time per iteration. The computational differences between them were due to the preprocessing phase of the genomic information. Regarding the indirect approaches, compared to GEBV obtained from single-step evaluations including all genotypes, indirect GEBV had correlations higher than 0.99 for all traits while showing little dispersion and level bias.ConclusionsIn conclusion, ssGBLUP predictions for the genotyped selection candidates were accurately approximated using the presented indirect approaches, which are more memory efficient and computationally fast, compared to solving a full ssGBLUP evaluation. Thus, indirect approaches can be used even on a weekly basis to estimate GEBV for newly genotyped animals, while the full single-step evaluation is done only a few times within a year.

Project description:Genomic selection (GS) is a strategy to predict the genetic merits of individuals using genome-wide markers. However, GS prediction accuracy is affected by many factors, including missing rate and minor allele frequency (MAF) of genotypic data, GS models, trait features, etc. In this study, we used one wheat population to investigate prediction accuracies of various GS models on yield and yield-related traits from various quality control (QC) scenarios, missing genotype imputation, and genome-wide association studies (GWAS)-derived markers. Missing rate and MAF of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers were two major factors in QC. Five missing rate levels (0%, 20%, 40%, 60%, and 80%) and three MAF levels (0%, 5%, and 10%) were considered and the five-fold cross validation was used to estimate the prediction accuracy. The results indicated that a moderate missing rate level (20% to 40%) and MAF (5%) threshold provided better prediction accuracy. Under this QC scenario, prediction accuracies were further calculated for imputed and GWAS-derived markers. It was observed that the accuracies of the six traits were related to their heritability and genetic architecture, as well as the GS prediction model. Moore-Penrose generalized inverse (GenInv), ridge regression (RidgeReg), and random forest (RForest) resulted in higher prediction accuracies than other GS models across traits. Imputation of missing genotypic data had marginal effect on prediction accuracy, while GWAS-derived markers improved the prediction accuracy in most cases. These results demonstrate that QC on missing rate and MAF had positive impact on the predictability of GS models. We failed to identify one single combination of QC scenarios that could outperform the others for all traits and GS models. However, the balance between marker number and marker quality is important for the deployment of GS in wheat breeding. GWAS is able to select markers which are mostly related to traits, and therefore can be used to improve the prediction accuracy of GS.

Dataset Information

Genomic analyses of glycine decarboxylase neurogenic mutations yield a large-scale prediction model for prenatal disease.

Publications

Genomic analyses of glycine decarboxylase neurogenic mutations yield a large-scale prediction model for prenatal disease.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets