Dataset Information

Sleep-wake parameters can be detected in patients with chronic stroke using a multisensor accelerometer: a validation study.

ABSTRACT:

Study objectives

Sleep-wake dysfunction is bidirectionally associated with the pathogenesis and evolution of stroke. Longitudinal and prospective measurement of sleep after chronic stroke remains poorly characterized because of a lack of validated objective and ambulatory sleep measurement tools in neurological populations. This study aimed to validate a multisensor sleep monitor, the SenseWear Armband (SWA), in patients with ischemic stroke and control patients using at-home polysomnography.

Methods

Twenty-eight radiologically confirmed patients with ischemic stroke (aged 69.61 ± 7.35 years; mean = 4.1 years poststroke) and 16 control patients (aged 73.75 ± 7.10 years) underwent overnight at-home polysomnography in tandem with the SWA. Lin's concordance correlation coefficient and reduced major axis regressions were employed to assess concordance of SWA vs polysomnography-measured total sleep time, sleep efficiency, sleep onset latency, and wake after sleep onset. Subsequently, data were converted to 30-second epochs to match at-home polysomnography. Epoch-by-epoch agreement between SWA and at-home polysomnography was estimated using crude agreement, Cohen's kappa, sensitivity, and specificity.

Results

Total sleep time was the most robustly quantified sleep-wake variable (concordance correlation coefficient = 0.49). The SWA performed poorest for sleep measures requiring discrimination of wakefulness (sleep onset latency; concordance correlation coefficient = 0.16). The sensitivity of the SWA was high (95.90%) for patients with stroke and for control patients (95.70%). The specificity of the SWA was fair-moderate for patients with stroke (40.45%) and moderate for control patients (45.60%). Epoch-by-epoch agreement rate was fair (78%) in patients with stroke and fair (74%) in controls.

Conclusions

The SWA shows promise as an ambulatory tool to estimate macro parameters of sleep-wake; however, agreement at an epoch level is only moderate-fair. Use of the SWA warrants caution when it is used as a diagnostic tool or in populations with significant sleep-wake fragmentation.

SUBMITTER: Gottlieb E

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7853221 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundDifferentiating nonwear time from sleep and wake times is essential for the estimation of sleep duration based on actigraphy data. To efficiently analyze large-scale data sets, an automatic method of identifying these three different states is required. Therefore, we developed a classification algorithm to determine nonwear, sleep and wake periods from accelerometer data. Our work aimed to (I) develop a new pattern recognition algorithm for identifying nonwear periods from actigraphy data based on the influence of respiration rate on the power spectrum of the acceleration signal and implement it in an automatic classification algorithm for nonwear/sleep/wake states; (II) address motion artifacts that occur during nonwear periods and are known to cause misclassification of these periods; (III) adjust the algorithm depending on the sensor position (wrist, chest); and (IV) validate the algorithm on both healthy individuals and patients with sleep disorders.MethodsThe study involved 98 participants who wore wrist and chest acceleration sensors for one day of measurements. They spent one night in the sleep laboratory and continued to wear the sensors outside of the laboratory for the remainder of the day. The results of the classification algorithm were compared to those of the reference source: polysomnography for wake/sleep and manual annotations for nonwear/wear classification.ResultsThe median kappa values for the two locations were 0.83 (wrist) and 0.84 (chest). The level of agreement did not vary significantly by sleep health (good sleepers vs. subjects with sleep disorders) (p = 0.348, p = 0.118) or by sex (p = 0.442, p = 0.456). The intraclass correlation coefficients of nonwear total time between the reference and the algorithm were 0.92 and 0.97 with the outliers and 0.95 and 0.98 after the outliers were removed for the wrist and chest, respectively. There was no evidence of an association between the mean difference (and 95% limits of agreement) and the mean of the two methods for either sensor position (wrist p = 0.110, chest p = 0.164), and the mean differences (algorithm minus reference) were 5.11 [95% LoA -15.4-25.7] and 1.32 [95% LoA -9.59-12.24] min/day, respectively, after the outliers were removed.DiscussionWe studied the influence of the respiration wave on the power spectrum of the acceleration signal for the differentiation of nonwear periods from sleep and wake periods. The algorithm combined both spectral analysis of the acceleration signal and rescoring. Based on the Bland-Altman analysis, the chest-worn accelerometer showed better results than the wrist-worn accelerometer.