Dataset Information

Outpatient health care utilization for sleep disorders in the Cerner Health Facts database.

ABSTRACT:

Study objectives

Sleep disorders are common in the general population. This study aimed to identify direct health care utilization for sleep disorders using big data through the Cerner Health Facts database.

Methods

The Cerner Health Facts database has 68.7 million patients in the data warehouse, documenting approximately 506.9 million encounters from 100 nonaffiliated health care systems. To identify sleep-related health care utilization, we examined the frequency of outpatient encounters related to sleep disorders between the years 2000 and 2017. Sleep disorders were grouped-based on the International Classification of Sleep Disorders-Third Edition.

Results

Approximately 20.5 million patients were identified with a total of 127.4 million outpatient encounters. In pediatric patients (ages 0-18 years), health care utilization for major sleep diagnoses was measured per 100,000 encounters. Sleep-related breathing disorders ranked first among common sleep disorders for pediatric patients followed by parasomnia, insomnia, sleep movement disorders, hypersomnolence, then circadian rhythm disorders (820.1, 258.1, 181.6, 68.3, 48.1, and 16.2 per 100,000 encounters, respectively). However, in adult patients, the ranking was slightly different, with sleep-related breathing disorders ranked first, followed by insomnia, sleep-related movement disorders, hypersomnolence, parasomnia, then circadian rhythm disorders (1352.6, 511.6, 166.3, 79.1, 25.7, and 4.2 per 100,000 encounters, respectively). In general, there was a bimodal pattern with a clear dip in sleep-related health care utilization in young adults age (age 19-29 years), with the exception of insomnia.

Conclusions

Patients with sleep disorders show relatively low health care utilization despite a known high prevalence of sleep disorders in the general population. This finding may highlight under-recognition of sleep problems or decreased access to health care for sleep disorders. In addition, this study highlights the effect of age-based variation on different sleep disorders, which may have an impact on allocating resources.

SUBMITTER: Al-Shawwa B

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7853225 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe postpartum period represents an opportunity to assess the cardiovascular health of women who experience chronic hypertension or hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.ObjectiveThis study aimed to determine whether women with chronic hypertension or hypertensive disorders of pregnancy access outpatient postpartum care more quickly compared to women with no hypertension.Study designWe used data from the Merative MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database. We included 275,937 commercially insured women aged 12 to 55 years who had a live birth or stillbirth delivery hospitalization between 2017 and 2018 and continuous insurance enrollment from 3 months before the estimated start of pregnancy to 6 months after delivery discharge. Using the International Classification of Diseases Tenth Revision Clinical Modification codes, we identified hypertensive disorders of pregnancy from inpatient or outpatient claims from 20 weeks gestation through delivery hospitalization and identified chronic hypertension from inpatient or outpatient claims from the beginning of the continuous enrollment period through delivery hospitalization. Distributions of time-to-event survival curves (time-to-first outpatient postpartum visit with a women's health provider, primary care provider, or cardiology provider) were compared between the hypertension types using Kaplan-Meier estimators and log rank tests. We used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate adjusted hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Time points of interest (3, 6, and 12 weeks) were evaluated per clinical postpartum care guidelines.ResultsAmong commercially insured women, the prevalences of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, chronic hypertension, and no documented hypertension were 11.7%, 3.4%, and 84.8%, respectively. The proportions of women with a visit within 3 weeks of delivery discharge were 28.5%, 26.4%, and 16.0% for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, chronic, and no documented hypertension, respectively; by 12 weeks, the proportions increased to 62.4%, 64.5%, and 54.2%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analyses indicated significant differences in utilization by hypertension type and interaction between hypertension type, and time before and after 6 weeks. In adjusted Cox proportional hazards models, the utilization rate before 6 weeks among women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy was 1.42 times the rate for women with no documented hypertension (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.39-1.45). Women with chronic hypertension also had higher utilization rates compared to women with no documented hypertension before 6 weeks (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 1.24-1.33). Only chronic hypertension was significantly associated with utilization compared to the no documented hypertension group after 6 weeks (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.14).ConclusionIn the 6 weeks following delivery discharge, women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and chronic hypertension attended outpatient postpartum care visits sooner than women with no documented hypertension. However, after 6 weeks this difference extended only to women with chronic hypertension. Overall, postpartum care utilization remained around 50% to 60% by 12 weeks in all groups. Addressing barriers to postpartum care attendance can ensure timely care for women at high risk for cardiovascular disease.

Project description:BackgroundThe number of people aged greater than 65 years is growing in many countries. Taiwan will be a superaged society in 2026, and health care utilization will increase considerably. Our study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the geriatric integrated outpatient clinic model for reducing health care utilization by older people.MethodsThis was a retrospective case-control study. Patients aged greater than 65 years seen at the geriatric outpatient clinic (Geri-OPD) and non-geriatric outpatient clinic (non-Geri-OPD) at a single medical centre were age and sex matched. Data on the number of outpatient clinic visits, emergency department visits, hospitalizations and medical expenditures were collected during the first and second years. A subgroup analysis by Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) and older age (age≧80 years) was performed, and the results were compared between the Geri-OPD and non-Geri-OPD groups.ResultsA total of 6723 patients were included (3796 women and 2927 men). The mean age was 80.42 ± 6.39 years. There were 1291 (19.2%) patients in the Geri-OPD group and 5432 (80.8%) patients in the non-Geri-OPD group. After one year of regular follow-up, the Geri-OPD patients showed a significant reduction in the types of drugs included in each prescription (5.62 ± 10.85) and the number of clinic visits per year (18.18 ± 48.85) (P < 0.01). After a two-year follow-up, the number of clinic visits, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations and the annual medical costs were still decreased in the Geri-OPD patients. The Geri-OPD patients had more comorbidities and a higher rate of health care utilization than the non-Geri-OPD patients. In the subgroup analysis, patients with more comorbidities (CCI≧2) and an older age (≧80 years) in the Geri-OPD group showed a significant reduction in health care utilization. The Geri-OPD patients also showed a significant decrease in medical utilization in the second year compared with the non-Geri-POD patients.ConclusionThe Geri-OPD reduced medical costs, the number of drugs prescribed, and the frequency of outpatient clinic visits, emergency department visits and hospitalizations in older patients with complicated conditions. The effect was even better in the second year.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Asylum seekers are a vulnerable group with special needs in health care due to their migration history and pre-, peri- and postmigratory social determinants of health. However, in Germany access to health care is restricted for asylum seekers by law and administrative regulations. METHODS:Using claims data generated in the billing process of health care services provided to asylum seekers, we explore their utilization of health care services in the outpatient sector. We describe the utilization of outpatient specialties, prevalences of diagnoses, prescribed drugs and other health care services, as well as total costs of health care provision. RESULTS:The estimated prevalence for visiting an ambulatory physician at least once per year was 67.5% [95%-Confidence-Interval (CI): 65.1-69.9%], with a notably higher prevalence for women than men. The diagnoses with the highest one-year prevalence were "Acute upper respiratory infections" (16.1% [14.5-18.0%]), "Abdominal and pelvic pain" (15.6% [13.9-17.4%]) and "Dorsalgia" (13.8% [12.2-15.5%]). A total of 21% of all prescriptions were for common pain killers. Women received more diagnoses across most diagnosis groups and prescribed drugs from all types than men. Less than half (45.3%) of all health care costs were generated in the outpatient sector. CONCLUSION:The analysis of claims data held in a municipal social services office is a novel approach to gain better insight into asylum seekers' utilization of health services on an individual level. Compared to regularly insured patients, four characteristics in health care utilization by asylum seekers were identified: low utilization of ambulatory physicians; a gender gap in almost all services, with higher utilization by women; frequent prescription of pain killers; and a low proportion of overall health care costs generated in the outpatient sector. Further research is needed to describe structural and individual factors producing these anomalies.

Project description:ImportanceVeterans Affairs (VA) Home-Based Primary Care (HBPC) provides comprehensive, interdisciplinary primary care at home to patients with complex, chronic, disabling disease, but little is known about care fragmentation patterns and consequences among these patients.ObjectiveTo examine outpatient care fragmentation patterns and subsequent acute care among HBPC-engaged patients at high risk of hospitalization or death.Design, setting, and participantsThis retrospective cohort study included VA patients aged at least 65 years who were enrolled in the VA and Medicare, whose risk of hospitalization or death was in the top 10%, and who had at least 4 outpatient visits between October 1, 2013, and September 30, 2014. HBPC engagement was defined as having at least 2 HBPC encounters between July 1, 2014, and September 30, 2014. Data were analyzed from March 2020 to March 2022.ExposuresTwo indices of outpatient care fragmentation: practitioner count and the Usual Provider Continuity Index (UPC), based on VA and non-VA health care use from October 1, 2013, to September 30, 2014. All care delivered by HBPC clinicians was analyzed as coming from a single practitioner.Main outcomes and measuresEmergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSC) from VA records and Medicare claims from October 1, 2014, to September 30, 2015.ResultsAmong 8908 identified HBPC patients, 8606 (96.6%) were male, 1562 (17.5%) were Black, 249 (2.8%) were Hispanic, 6499 (73.0%) were White, 157 (1.8%) were other race or ethnicity, and 441 (5.0%) had unknown race or ethnicity; the mean (SD) age was 80.0 (9.02) years; patients had a mean (SD) of 11.25 (3.87) chronic conditions, and commonly had disabling conditions such as dementia (38.8% [n = 3457]). In adjusted models, a greater number of practitioners was associated with increased odds of an ED visit (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.05 [95% CI, 1.03-1.07]) and hospitalization for an ACSC (aOR, 1.04 [95% CI, 1.02-1.06]), whereas more concentrated care with a higher UPC was associated with reduced odds of these outcomes (highest vs lowest tertile of UPC: aOR for ED visit, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.67-0.88], aOR for ACSC hospitalization, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.68-0.88]).Conclusions and relevanceAmong patients in HBPC, fragmented care was associated with more ED visits and ACSC hospitalizations. These findings suggest that consolidating or coordinating fragmented care may be a target for reducing preventable acute care.

Project description:ImportanceA population-based study using validated algorithms to estimate the costs of treating people with chronic disease with and without mental health disorders is needed.ObjectiveTo determine the association of mental health disorders with health care costs among people with chronic diseases.Design, setting, and participantsThis population-based cohort study in the Canadian province of Alberta collected data from April 1, 2012, to March 31, 2015, among 991?445 adults 18 years and older with a chronic disease (ie, asthma, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, diabetes, epilepsy, hypertension, chronic pulmonary disease, or chronic kidney disease). Data analysis was conducted from October 2017 to August 2018.ExposuresMental health disorder (ie, depression, schizophrenia, alcohol use disorder, or drug use disorder).Main outcomes and measuresResource use, mean total unadjusted and adjusted 3-year health care costs, and mean total unadjusted 3-year costs for hospitalization and emergency department visits for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions.ResultsAmong 991?445 participants, 156?296 (15.8%) had a mental health disorder. Those with no mental health disorder were older (mean [SD] age, 58.1 [17.6] years vs 55.4 [17.0] years; P?<?.001) and less likely to be women (50.4% [95% CI, 50.3%-50.5%] vs 57.7% [95% CI, 57.4%-58.0%]; P?<?.001) than those with mental health disorders. For those with a mental health disorder, mean total 3-year adjusted costs were $38?250 (95% CI, $36?476-$39?935), and for those without a mental health disorder, mean total 3-year adjusted costs were $22?280 (95% CI, $21?780-$22?760). Having a mental health disorder was associated with significantly higher resource use, including hospitalization and emergency department visit rates, length of stay, and hospitalization for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions. Higher resource use by patients with mental health disorders was not associated with health care presentations owing to chronic diseases compared with patients without a mental health disorder (chronic disease hospitalization rate per 1000 patient days, 0.11 [95% CI, 0.11-0.12] vs 0.06 [95% CI, 0.06-0.06]; P?<?.001; overall hospitalization rate per 1000 patient days, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.87-0.88] vs 0.43 [95% CI, 0.43-0.43]; P?<?.001).Conclusions and relevanceThis study suggests that mental health disorders are associated with substantially higher resource utilization and health care costs among patients with chronic diseases. These findings have clinical and health policy implications.