Dataset Information

Measurement properties of the product of investigator's global assessment and body surface area in children and adults with atopic dermatitis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Multiple clinician-reported outcome measures exist for atopic dermatitis (AD) severity. However, there is no gold standard for use in clinical practice.

Objectives

To determine the measurement properties of the product of validated Investigator's Global Assessment for AD (vIGA) and body surface area (BSA) overall or divided into six categories (cBSA: 0%/0.1, <10%/10, <30%/30, <50%/50, <70%/70 and <90%/90-100%) and compare with other clinician-reported and patient-reported outcomes in adults and children with AD.

Methods

We performed a prospective dermatology practice-based study using questionnaires and evaluation by a dermatologist (n = 653).

Results

vIGA*BSA and vIGA*cBSA had good convergent validity with BSA (Spearman's ρ = 0.97 and 0.93), eczema area and severity index (ρ = 0.94 and 0.92), and objective SCORAD (ρ = 0.88 and 0.89); and weak-to-good convergent validity with Numeric Rating Scale average itch (ρ = 0.22 and 0.22) and worst itch (ρ = 0.27 and 0.28), Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (ρ = 0.44 and 0.43), Dermatology Life Quality Index (ρ = 0.48 and 0.49), ItchyQOL (ρ = 0.45 and 0.46), PROMIS Sleep Disturbance (ρ = 0.46 and 0.37) and sleep-related impairment (ρ = 0.31 and 0.31) in adults and/or children; very good discriminant validity for physician-reported global AD severity; good responsiveness to change of severity of AD and itch; and good reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [95% confidence interval]: 0.72 [0.60-0.81] and 0.74 [0.62-0.82]) with no floor or ceiling effects. Thresholds for interpretability bands and clinically important difference were established.

Conclusions

vIGA*BSA and vIGA*cBSA scores showed good convergent and discriminant validity, reliability, responsiveness and interpretability in adults and children with AD, and were feasible for use in clinical practice. vIGA*BSA and vIGA*cBSA had slightly lower convergent validity than EASI or objective SCORAD, but might be more efficient to collect and score.

SUBMITTER: Silverberg JI

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7855397 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionAtopic dermatitis (AD) severity was measured in two phase 3 US studies of crisaborole ointment, 2%, in patients aged ≥ 2 years using the Investigator's Static Global Assessment (ISGA), an FDA-recommended scale. Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) is a validated scale used globally to assess AD severity in clinical trials. The objective of this study is to aid interpretability of ISGA by translating ISGA scores to EASI scores.MethodsISGA was mapped to EASI using published EASI severity strata by Chopra et al. and Leshem et al. and pooled data from phase 3 trials CrisADe CORE 1 and CORE 2, which evaluated crisaborole in patients aged ≥ 2 years with mild-to-moderate AD (crisaborole, n = 1016; vehicle, n = 506). Least squares mean (LSM) percentage change from baseline (%CFB) in EASI and proportion of patients with 50%, 75%, and 90% improvement (EASI-50, EASI-75, and EASI-90, respectively) on day 29 were computed for mapped EASI. The relationship between changes in ISGA and changes in EASI was assessed using data from three abrocitinib trials.ResultsISGA was mapped to EASI using 70,000 random simulations. LSM (standard error) for %CFB in mapped EASI at day 29 (crisaborole versus vehicle) was -26.3% (17) versus 45.2% (35) (P = 0.0671) using Chopra strata and -43.1% (4.6) versus -5.2% (8.4) (P < 0.0001) using Leshem strata. EASI-50, EASI-75, and EASI-90 rates were 72.1% versus 57.6%, 63.0% versus 47.8%, and 55.0% versus 40.1%, respectively, using Chopra strata (P < 0.0001 for each difference). These rates were 68.8% versus 54.0%, 54.8% versus 40.5%, and 38.9% versus 27.2%, respectively (P < 0.0001 for each difference) using Leshem strata. Mean two-point improvement in ISGA was comparable to EASI-90.ConclusionMapped EASI results were consistent with ISGA results in crisaborole phase 3 trials. Simulation methodologies yielded consistent results and may aid in interpretability of ISGA across clinical studies.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02118766, NCT02118792.

Project description:IntroductionBaricitinib, an oral Janus kinase (JAK)1/JAK2 inhibitor, is indicated in the European Union and Japan for treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in adults who are candidates for systemic therapy. In the ongoing, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial BREEZE-AD5, once-daily oral baricitinib 2-mg monotherapy improved disease in moderate-to-severe AD patients who had an inadequate response or intolerance to topical corticosteroids. This post-hoc analysis aimed to identify responders to baricitinib 2 mg, using a proposed clinical tailoring approach based on baseline body surface area (BSA) affected and early clinical improvement, in BREEZE-AD5.MethodsClassification and regression tree method was used to evaluate baseline predictors for the proportion of patients achieving ≥ 75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI75) at week 16 among baricitinib 2-mg-treated patients. Two-by-two contingency tables evaluated the association between early response, defined as ≥ 50% improvement in BSA or ≥ 3-point improvement in Itch Numeric Rating Scale from baseline at weeks 4 or 8, and response at week 16 for the proportion of patients achieving EASI75, validated Investigator Global Assessment for AD (vIGA-AD) score of 0 or 1, or ≥ 4-point improvement in Itch (Itch ≥ 4), respectively. Missing data were imputed as non-responder.ResultsAt week 16, EASI75 and vIGA-AD (0,1) were achieved by 37.5% and 31.7% of baricitinib 2-mg-treated patients with baseline BSA 10-50% compared with 9.5% and 4.8% with BSA > 50%. Early response in skin inflammation or itch at week 4 was associated with corresponding EASI75, vIGA-AD (0,1), and Itch ≥ 4 of 55.4%, 48.2%, and 39.3% at week 16, while early response at week 8 was associated with 66.7%, 56.1%, and 42.1% of patients achieving these endpoints.ConclusionBaseline BSA of 10-50% and early clinical improvement after 4 or 8 weeks of baricitinib 2-mg treatment may identify patients most likely to benefit from long-term baricitinib 2-mg therapy.Clinical trial registrationNCT03435081.