Dataset Information

Prediction of severe chest injury using natural language processing from the electronic health record.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Trauma injury severity scores are currently calculated retrospectively from the electronic health record (EHR) using manual annotation by certified trauma coders. Natural language processing (NLP) of clinical documents in the EHR may enable automated injury scoring. We hypothesize that NLP with machine learning can discriminate between cases of severe and non-severe injury to the thorax after trauma.

Methods

Clinical documents from a trauma center were examined between 2014 and 2018. Severe chest injury was defined as a thorax abbreviated injury score (AIS) >2 and served as the reference standard for supervised learning. Free text unigrams and concept unique identifiers (CUIs) from the Unified Medical Language Systems (UMLS) were extracted from clinical documents collected at one hour, four hours, and eight hours after patient arrival to the emergency department. Logistic regression models with elastic net regularization were tuned to maximize area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) using 10-fold cross-validation on the training dataset (80%) and tested on a hold-out 20% dataset.

Results

There were 6,891 traumas that met inclusion criteria. The complete data corpus consisted of 473,694 documents. Models trained using the first hour of data had a mean AUROC of 0.88 (95%CI [0.86, 0.89]); model discrimination and reclassification from the first hour significantly improved after eight hours with a mean AUROC of 0.94 (95%CI [0.93, 0.95]). Performance of models using CUIs were similar to unigrams (p>0.05). Models demonstrated excellent clinical face validity.

Conclusions

Both CUIs and unigrams demonstrated excellent discrimination in predicting severity of chest injury using the first eight hours of clinical documents. Our model demonstrates that automated anatomical injury scoring is feasible and may be used for aggregation of data for trauma research and quality programs.

SUBMITTER: Kulshrestha S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7856032 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceAccurate prediction of outcomes among patients in intensive care units (ICUs) is important for clinical research and monitoring care quality. Most existing prediction models do not take full advantage of the electronic health record, using only the single worst value of laboratory tests and vital signs and largely ignoring information present in free-text notes. Whether capturing more of the available data and applying machine learning and natural language processing (NLP) can improve and automate the prediction of outcomes among patients in the ICU remains unknown.ObjectivesTo evaluate the change in power for a mortality prediction model among patients in the ICU achieved by incorporating measures of clinical trajectory together with NLP of clinical text and to assess the generalizability of this approach.Design, setting, and participantsThis retrospective cohort study included 101 196 patients with a first-time admission to the ICU and a length of stay of at least 4 hours. Twenty ICUs at 2 academic medical centers (University of California, San Francisco [UCSF], and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center [BIDMC], Boston, Massachusetts) and 1 community hospital (Mills-Peninsula Medical Center [MPMC], Burlingame, California) contributed data from January 1, 2001, through June 1, 2017. Data were analyzed from July 1, 2017, through August 1, 2018.Main outcomes and measuresIn-hospital mortality and model discrimination as assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and model calibration as assessed by the modified Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic.ResultsAmong 101 196 patients included in the analysis, 51.3% (n = 51 899) were male, with a mean (SD) age of 61.3 (17.1) years; their in-hospital mortality rate was 10.4% (n = 10 505). A baseline model using only the highest and lowest observed values for each laboratory test result or vital sign achieved a cross-validated AUC of 0.831 (95% CI, 0.830-0.832). In contrast, that model augmented with measures of clinical trajectory achieved an AUC of 0.899 (95% CI, 0.896-0.902; P < .001 for AUC difference). Further augmenting this model with NLP-derived terms associated with mortality further increased the AUC to 0.922 (95% CI, 0.916-0.924; P < .001). These NLP-derived terms were associated with improved model performance even when applied across sites (AUC difference for UCSF: 0.077 to 0.021; AUC difference for MPMC: 0.071 to 0.051; AUC difference for BIDMC: 0.035 to 0.043; P < .001) when augmenting with NLP at each site.Conclusions and relevanceIntensive care unit mortality prediction models incorporating measures of clinical trajectory and NLP-derived terms yielded excellent predictive performance and generalized well in this sample of hospitals. The role of these automated algorithms, particularly those using unstructured data from notes and other sources, in clinical research and quality improvement seems to merit additional investigation.

Project description:OBJECTIVES:To demonstrate the utility of a natural language processing (NLP) algorithm for mining kidney stone composition in a large-scale electronic health records (EHR) repository. METHODS:We developed StoneX, a pattern-matching method for extracting kidney stone composition information from clinical notes. We trained the extraction algorithm on manually annotated text mentions of calcium oxalate monohydrate, calcium oxalate dihydrate, hydroxyapatite, brushite, uric acid, and struvite stones. We employed StoneX to identify patients with kidney stone composition data and mine >125 million notes from our institutional EHR. Analyses performed on the extracted patients included stone type conversions over time, survival analysis from a second stone surgery, and disease associations by stone composition to validate the phenotyping method against known associations. RESULTS:The NLP algorithm identified 45,235 text mentions corresponding to 11,585 patients. Overall, the system achieved positive predictive value >90% for calcium oxalate monohydrate, calcium oxalate dihydrate, hydroxyapatite, brushite, and struvite; except for uric acid (positive predictive value?=?87.5%). Survival analysis from a second stone surgery showed statistically significant differences among stone types (P?=?.03). Several phenotype associations were found: uric acid-type 2 diabetes (odds ratio, OR?=?2.69, 95% confidence intervals, CI?=?1.91-3.79), struvite-neurogenic bladder (OR?=?12.27, 95% CI?=?4.33-34.79), struvite-urinary tract infection (OR?=?7.36, 95% CI?=?3.01-17.99), hydroxyapatite-pulmonary collapse (OR?=?3.67, 95% CI?=?2.10-6.42), hydroxyapatite-neurogenic bladder (OR?=?5.23, 95% CI?=?2.05-13.36), brushite-calcium metabolism disorder (OR?=?4.59, 95% CI?=?2.14-9.81), and brushite-hypercalcemia (OR?=?4.09, 95% CI?=?1.90-8.80). CONCLUSION:NLP extraction of kidney stone composition from large-scale EHRs is feasible with high precision, enabling high-throughput epidemiological studies of kidney stone disease. These tools will enable high fidelity kidney stone research from the EHR.

Project description:BackgroundAbstracting cerebrovascular disease (CeVD) from inpatient electronic medical records (EMRs) through natural language processing (NLP) is pivotal for automated disease surveillance and improving patient outcomes. Existing methods rely on coders' abstraction, which has time delays and under-coding issues. This study sought to develop an NLP-based method to detect CeVD using EMR clinical notes.MethodsCeVD status was confirmed through a chart review on randomly selected hospitalized patients who were 18 years or older and discharged from 3 hospitals in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, between January 1 and June 30, 2015. These patients' chart data were linked to administrative discharge abstract database (DAD) and Sunrise™ Clinical Manager (SCM) EMR database records by Personal Health Number (a unique lifetime identifier) and admission date. We trained multiple natural language processing (NLP) predictive models by combining two clinical concept extraction methods and two supervised machine learning (ML) methods: random forest and XGBoost. Using chart review as the reference standard, we compared the model performances with those of the commonly applied International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10-CA) codes, on the metrics of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV).ResultOf the study sample (n = 3036), the prevalence of CeVD was 11.8% (n = 360); the median patient age was 63; and females accounted for 50.3% (n = 1528) based on chart data. Among 49 extracted clinical documents from the EMR, four document types were identified as the most influential text sources for identifying CeVD disease ("nursing transfer report," "discharge summary," "nursing notes," and "inpatient consultation."). The best performing NLP model was XGBoost, combining the Unified Medical Language System concepts extracted by cTAKES (e.g., top-ranked concepts, "Cerebrovascular accident" and "Transient ischemic attack"), and the term frequency-inverse document frequency vectorizer. Compared with ICD codes, the model achieved higher validity overall, such as sensitivity (25.0% vs 70.0%), specificity (99.3% vs 99.1%), PPV (82.6 vs. 87.8%), and NPV (90.8% vs 97.1%).ConclusionThe NLP algorithm developed in this study performed better than the ICD code algorithm in detecting CeVD. The NLP models could result in an automated EMR tool for identifying CeVD cases and be applied for future studies such as surveillance, and longitudinal studies.

Project description:ImportanceInternational Classification of Diseases-coded hospital discharge data do not accurately reflect whether firearm injuries were caused by assault, unintentional injury, self-harm, legal intervention, or were of undetermined intent. Applying natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning (ML) techniques to electronic health record (EHR) narrative text could be associated with improved accuracy of firearm injury intent data.ObjectiveTo assess the accuracy with which an ML model identified firearm injury intent.Design, setting, and participantsA cross-sectional retrospective EHR review was conducted at 3 level I trauma centers, 2 from health care institutions in Boston, Massachusetts, and 1 from Seattle, Washington, between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2019; data analysis was performed from January 18, 2021, to August 22, 2022. A total of 1915 incident cases of firearm injury in patients presenting to emergency departments at the model development institution and 769 from the external validation institution with a firearm injury code assigned according to International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) or International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM), in discharge data were included.ExposuresClassification of firearm injury intent.Main outcomes and measuresIntent classification accuracy by the NLP model was compared with ICD codes assigned by medical record coders in discharge data. The NLP model extracted intent-relevant features from narrative text that were then used by a gradient-boosting classifier to determine the intent of each firearm injury. Classification accuracy was evaluated against intent assigned by the research team. The model was further validated using an external data set.ResultsThe NLP model was evaluated in 381 patients presenting with firearm injury at the model development site (mean [SD] age, 39.2 [13.0] years; 348 [91.3%] men) and 304 patients at the external development site (mean [SD] age, 31.8 [14.8] years; 263 [86.5%] men). The model proved more accurate than medical record coders in assigning intent to firearm injuries at the model development site (accident F-score, 0.78 vs 0.40; assault F-score, 0.90 vs 0.78). The model maintained this improvement on an external validation set from a second institution (accident F-score, 0.64 vs 0.58; assault F-score, 0.88 vs 0.81). While the model showed some degradation between institutions, retraining the model using data from the second institution further improved performance on that site's records (accident F-score, 0.75; assault F-score, 0.92).Conclusions and relevanceThe findings of this study suggest that NLP ML can be used to improve the accuracy of firearm injury intent classification compared with ICD-coded discharge data, particularly for cases of accident and assault intents (the most prevalent and commonly misclassified intent types). Future research could refine this model using larger and more diverse data sets.

Project description:BackgroundSystemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a rare autoimmune disorder characterized by an unpredictable course of flares and remission with diverse manifestations. Lupus nephritis, one of the major disease manifestations of SLE for organ damage and mortality, is a key component of lupus classification criteria. Accurately identifying lupus nephritis in electronic health records (EHRs) would therefore benefit large cohort observational studies and clinical trials where characterization of the patient population is critical for recruitment, study design, and analysis. Lupus nephritis can be recognized through procedure codes and structured data, such as laboratory tests. However, other critical information documenting lupus nephritis, such as histologic reports from kidney biopsies and prior medical history narratives, require sophisticated text processing to mine information from pathology reports and clinical notes. In this study, we developed algorithms to identify lupus nephritis with and without natural language processing (NLP) using EHR data from the Northwestern Medicine Enterprise Data Warehouse (NMEDW).MethodsWe developed five algorithms: a rule-based algorithm using only structured data (baseline algorithm) and four algorithms using different NLP models. The first NLP model applied simple regular expression for keywords search combined with structured data. The other three NLP models were based on regularized logistic regression and used different sets of features including positive mention of concept unique identifiers (CUIs), number of appearances of CUIs, and a mixture of three components (i.e. a curated list of CUIs, regular expression concepts, structured data) respectively. The baseline algorithm and the best performing NLP algorithm were externally validated on a dataset from Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC).ResultsOur best performing NLP model incorporated features from both structured data, regular expression concepts, and mapped concept unique identifiers (CUIs) and showed improved F measure in both the NMEDW (0.41 vs 0.79) and VUMC (0.52 vs 0.93) datasets compared to the baseline lupus nephritis algorithm.ConclusionOur NLP MetaMap mixed model improved the F-measure greatly compared to the structured data only algorithm in both internal and external validation datasets. The NLP algorithms can serve as powerful tools to accurately identify lupus nephritis phenotype in EHR for clinical research and better targeted therapies.