Dataset Information

Reliability of the Clinical Frailty Scale in very elderly ICU patients: a prospective European study.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

Frailty is a valuable predictor for outcome in elderly ICU patients, and has been suggested to be used in various decision-making processes prior to and during an ICU admission. There are many instruments developed to assess frailty, but few of them can be used in emergency situations. In this setting the clinical frailty scale (CFS) is frequently used. The present study is a sub-study within a larger outcome study of elderly ICU patients in Europe (the VIP-2 study) in order to document the reliability of the CFS.

Materials and methods

From the VIP-2 study, 129 ICUs in 20 countries participated in this sub-study. The patients were acute admissions???80 years of age and frailty was assessed at admission by two independent observers using the CFS. Information was obtained from the patient, if not feasible, from the family/caregivers or from hospital files. The profession of the rater and source of data were recorded along with the score. Interrater variability was calculated using linear weighted kappa analysis.

Results

1923 pairs of assessors were included and background data of patients were similar to the whole cohort (n?=?3920). We found a very high inter-rater agreement (weighted kappa 0.86), also in subgroup analyses. The agreement when comparing information from family or hospital records was better than using only direct patient information, and pairs of raters from same profession performed better than from different professions.

Conclusions

Overall, we documented a high reliability using CFS in this setting. This frailty score could be used more frequently in elderly ICU patients in order to create a more holistic and realistic impression of the patient´s condition prior to ICU admission.

SUBMITTER: Flaatten H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7856616 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Reliability of the Clinical Frailty Scale in very elderly ICU patients: a prospective European study.

Flaatten Hans H Guidet Bertrand B Andersen Finn H FH Artigas Antonio A Cecconi Maurizio M Boumendil Ariane A Elhadi Muhammed M Fjølner Jesper J Joannidis Michael M Jung Christian C Leaver Susannah S Marsh Brian B Moreno Rui R Oeyen Sandra S Nalapko Yuriy Y Schefold Joerg C JC Szczeklik Wojciech W Walther Sten S Watson Ximena X Zafeiridis Tilemachos T de Lange Dylan W DW

Annals of intensive care 20210203 1

<h4>Purpose</h4>Frailty is a valuable predictor for outcome in elderly ICU patients, and has been suggested to be used in various decision-making processes prior to and during an ICU admission. There are many instruments developed to assess frailty, but few of them can be used in emergency situations. In this setting the clinical frailty scale (CFS) is frequently used. The present study is a sub-study within a larger outcome study of elderly ICU patients in Europe (the VIP-2 study) in order to d ...[more]

PMID: 33534010

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundFrailty is a distinctive health state associated with a loss of physiological reserve that results in higher rates of perioperative complications and impaired return to pre-morbid functional status. It is prevalent in the vascular population; however routine assessment is not common despite national guidance to the contrary. We aimed to evaluate the reliability of the Clinical Frailty Scale in assessing frailty in the surgical vascular population.MethodsIn this prospective, observational, observer-blinded study, we compared assessment of frailty in patients scheduled for major vascular surgery attending the pre-operative assessment clinic using the Clinical Frailty Scale against the Edmonton Frailty Scale. The study investigator completed the Edmonton Frailty Scale assessment; this was compared to the Clinical Frailty Scale assessments performed by the pre-assessment consultant and pre-assessment nurse, who were blinded to the Edmonton Frailty Scale score. The inter-rater reliability of the Clinical Frailty Scale between the pre-assessment consultant and pre-assessment nurse was determined by comparing their frailty scores for each patient.ResultsNinety-seven patients were included in the analysis (median age 72 years, 84% male and 16% female). There was a moderate level of agreement between the Edmonton and Clinical Frailty Scale score for both consultants (87.6% agreement) and pre-assessment nurses (87.6% agreement). There was a substantial level of agreement between consultants and pre-assessment nurses for the Clinical Frailty Scale (89.7% agreement) CONCLUSIONS: The Clinical Frailty Scale is a useful tool to assess frailty in the vascular surgical population. It is more practical than the Edmonton Frailty Scale: quick to complete, requires minimal training and can be used when physical disability is present.Trial registrationThe study was approved by the Wales Health and Care Research Ethics Service (REC reference 17/WA/0160, IRAS 201173).Trial registrationNCT03403673. Registered 19 January 2018, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03403673.

Project description:BackgroundOlder age is a well-known risk factor for unfavorable outcome in traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, many older people with TBI respond well to aggressive treatments, suggesting that chronological age and TBI severity alone may be inadequate prognostic markers. Frailty is an age-related homeostatic imbalance of loss of physiologic and cognitive reserve resulting in both limitation in autonomy of activities of daily living and vulnerability to adverse events. We hypothesized that frailty would be associated with 6-month adverse functional outcome in older people affected by moderate or severe TBI.MethodsThis was a single-center prospective observational study. We enrolled consecutive patients aged ≥65 years after TBI with Glasgow Coma Scale ≤13 and admitted to our Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit. Frailty was evaluated by Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS). Relationships between TBI severity, frailty and extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE) at 6-month were evaluated.ResultsSixty patients were studied, 65% were males, their age was 76 years (IQR 70-80) and their admission GCS was 8 (IQR 6-11) with a GCS motor score of 5 (IQR 4-5). Twenty eight were vulnerable-frail (defined as CFS ≥ 4). Vulnerable-frail patients showed greater 6-month mortality and unfavorable outcome compared to non-frail [87% vs. 30% OR and 95% CI: 15.7 (3.9-55.2), p < 0.0001 and 92% vs. 51% OR and 95% CI: 9.9 (2.1-46.3), p = 0.002]. In univariate analysis patients with unfavorable outcome were more frequently male and vulnerable-frail, had a higher prevalence of pre-existing neurodegenerative disease, abnormal pupil, lower GCS and had worst CT scan characteristics. At multivariate analysis, only CFS ≥ 4 and traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage remained associated to 6-month outcome.ConclusionFrailty was associated with 6 month-outcome, suggesting that the pre-injury functional status could represent an additional indicator to stratify patient's severity and to predict outcome.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Focus on frailty status has become increasingly important when determining care plans within and across health care sectors. A standardized frailty measure applicable for both primary and secondary health care sectors is needed to provide a common reference point. The aim of this study was to translate the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) into Danish (CFS-DK) and test inter-rater reliability for key health care professionals in the primary and secondary sectors using the CFS-DK. METHODS:The Clinical Frailty Scale was translated into Danish using the ISPOR principles for translation and cultural adaptation that included forward and back translation, review by the original developer, and cognitive debriefing. For the validation exercise, 40 participants were asked to rate 15 clinical case vignettes using the CFS-DK. The raters were distributed across several health care professions: primary care physicians (n?=?10), community nurses (n?=?10), hospital doctors from internal medicine (n?=?10) and intensive care (n?=?10). Inter-rater reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and sensitivity analysis was performed using multilevel random effects linear regression. RESULTS:The Clinical Frailty Scale was translated and culturally adapted into Danish and is presented in this paper in its final form. Inter-rater reliability in the four professional groups ranged from ICC 0.81 to 0.90. Sensitivity analysis showed no significant impact of professional group or length of clinical experience. The health care professionals considered the CFS-DK to be relevant for their own area of work and for cross-sectoral collaboration. CONCLUSION:The Clinical Frailty Scale was translated and culturally adapted into Danish. The inter-rater reliability was high in all four groups of health care professionals involved in cross-sectoral collaborations. However, the use of case vignettes may reduce the generalizability of the reliability findings to real-life settings. The CFS has the potential to serve as a common reference tool when treating and rehabilitating older patients.

Dataset Information

Reliability of the Clinical Frailty Scale in very elderly ICU patients: a prospective European study.

Purpose

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Reliability of the Clinical Frailty Scale in very elderly ICU patients: a prospective European study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets