Unknown

Dataset Information

0

The economic burden of systemic lupus erythematosus in commercially- and medicaid-insured populations in the United States.


ABSTRACT:

Objective

To estimate the economic burden of systematic lupus erythematous (SLE), stratified by disease severity, in commercially- and Medicaid-insured US populations.

Methods

Adults (?18 years) with SLE treated with antimalarials, selected biologics, immunosuppressants, and systemic glucocorticoids (2010-2014) were identified within the commercial and Medicaid insurance IBM MarketScan® databases (index date = first SLE medication claim). Both cohorts were stratified into mild (receiving antimalarial or glucocorticoid monotherapy ?5 mg/day) versus moderate/severe SLE (receiving glucocorticoids >5 mg/day, biologic, immunosuppressant, or combination therapy) during a 6-month exposure period. All-cause healthcare utilization and costs were evaluated during the 12 months following the exposure period.

Results

Among 8231 commercially-insured patients, 32.6% had mild and 67.4% had moderate/severe SLE by our definition. Among 802 Medicaid-insured patients, 25.2% had mild and 74.8% had moderate/severe SLE. Adjusted mean total healthcare costs, excluding pharmacy, for moderate/severe SLE patients were higher than for mild SLE patients in the commercially-insured ($39,021 versus $23,519; p < 0.0001) and Medicaid-insured populations ($56,050 versus $44,932; p = 0.06). In both SLE severity populations total unadjusted costs were significantly higher among Medicaid-insured than commercially-insured patients.

Conclusion

Commercially-insured patients with treatment suggesting moderate/severe SLE incurred significantly higher adjusted mean healthcare costs, excluding pharmacy, compared with mild SLE patients. While not reaching statistical significance, moderate/severe Medicaid-insured patients had higher costs then mild SLE patients. Total unadjusted healthcare costs were significantly higher among Medicaid-insured than commercially-insured patients. These differential costs are important to consider and monitor when implementing interventions to improve health and reduce healthcare spending for SLE.

SUBMITTER: Clarke AE 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7857313 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

The economic burden of systemic lupus erythematosus in commercially- and medicaid-insured populations in the United States.

Clarke Ann E AE   Yazdany Jinoos J   Kabadi Shaum M SM   Durden Emily E   Winer Isabelle I   Griffing Kirstin K   Costenbader Karen H KH  

Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism 20200523 4


<h4>Objective</h4>To estimate the economic burden of systematic lupus erythematous (SLE), stratified by disease severity, in commercially- and Medicaid-insured US populations.<h4>Methods</h4>Adults (≥18 years) with SLE treated with antimalarials, selected biologics, immunosuppressants, and systemic glucocorticoids (2010-2014) were identified within the commercial and Medicaid insurance IBM MarketScan® databases (index date = first SLE medication claim). Both cohorts were stratified into mild (re  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC10546560 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4942278 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4896801 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4446132 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8524749 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6585770 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6824377 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10842271 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6078826 | biostudies-literature
2014-06-03 | E-GEOD-46923 | biostudies-arrayexpress