Dataset Information

Association Between In-Clinic Opioid Administration and Discharge Opioid Prescription in Urgent Care: a Retrospective Cohort Study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Emergency departments increasingly use nonopioid analgesics to manage acute pain and minimize opioid-related harms. Urgent care centers are expanding to lower costs and provide efficient access to healthcare. General internists increasingly work in these acute care settings. Much is known about opioid prescribing in the primary care, inpatient, and emergency department setting. Little is known about opioid prescribing in the urgent care setting and associated outcomes.

Objectives

To assess the association between in-clinic opioid administration and opioid receipt at clinic discharge and on progression to chronic opioid use among urgent care patients.

Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Participants

Patients, 20 years or older and not on opioid medications, who presented for care to an urgent care clinic within a safety-net healthcare system from June 1, 2016, to April 30, 2019.

Main measures

We examined the association between the in-clinic administration of oral or intravenous opioids and opioid receipt at clinic discharge. We also examined the association between in-clinic opioid administration and progression to chronic opioid use after six months.

Key results

The study sample included 34,978 patients, of which 13.8% (n = 4842) received in-clinic opioids and 86.2% (n = 30,136) did not receive in-clinic opioids. After adjusting for age, gender, race/ethnicity, insurance, and pain diagnosis, patients who received in-clinic opioids were more likely to receive opioids at discharge compared to patients who did not receive in-clinic opioids (aOR = 12.30, 95% CI 11.44-13.23). Among a selected cohort of patients, in-clinic opioid administration was associated with progression to chronic opioid use (aOR = 2.12, 95% CI 1.66-2.71).

Conclusions

In-clinic opioid administration was strongly associated with opioid receipt at discharge and progression to chronic opioid use. Increased use of nonopioid analgesics in urgent care could likely reduce this association and limit opioids available for diversion, overdose, and death.

SUBMITTER: Calcaterra SL

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7859130 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundTo examine factors associated with post-Cesarean section analgesic prescription variation at hospital discharge in patients who are opioid naïve; and examine relationships between pre-Cesarean section patient and care-level factors and discharge morphine equivalent dose (MED) on outcomes (e.g., probability of opioid refill within 30 days) across a large healthcare system.MethodsThe Walter Reed Institutional Review Board provided an exempt determination, waiver of consent, and waiver of HIPAA authorization for research use in the present retrospective longitudinal cohort study. Patient records were included in analyses if: sex assigned in the medical record was "female," age was 18 years of age or older, the Cesarean section occurred between January 2016 to December 2019 in the Military Health System, the listed TRICARE sponsor was an active duty service member, hospitalization began no more than three days prior to the Cesarean section, and the patient was discharged to home < 4 days after the Cesarean section.ResultsAcross 57 facilities, 32,757 adult patients had a single documented Cesarean section procedure in the study period; 24,538 met inclusion criteria and were used in analyses. Post-Cesarean section discharge MED varied by facility, with a median MED of 225 mg and median 5-day supply. Age, active duty status, hospitalization duration, mental health diagnosis, pain diagnosis, substance use disorder, alcohol use disorder, gestational diabetes, discharge opioid type (combined vs. opioid-only medication), concurrent tubal ligation procedure, single (vs. multiple) births, and discharge morphine equivalent dose were associated with the probability of an opioid prescription refill in bivariate analyses, and therefore were included as covariates in a generalized additive mixed model (GAMM). Generalized additive mixed model results indicated that non-active duty beneficiaries, those with mental health and pain conditions, those who received an opioid/non-opioid combination medication, those with multiple births, and older patients were more likely to obtain an opioid refill, relative to their counterparts.ConclusionSignificant variation in discharge pain medication prescriptions, as well as the lack of association between discharge opioid MED and probability of refill, indicates that efforts are needed to optimize opioid prescribing and reduce unnecessary healthcare variation.

Project description:ImportanceTime pressure to provide a quick fix is commonly cited as a reason why opioids are frequently prescribed in the United States, but there is little evidence of an association between appointment timing and clinical decision-making. As the workday progresses and appointments run behind schedule, physicians may be more likely to prescribe opioids.ObjectiveTo estimate whether characteristics of appointment timing are associated with clinical decision-making about pain treatment.Design, setting, and participantsThis cross-sectional study of physician behavior used data from electronic health record systems in primary care offices in the United States to analyze primary care appointments occurring in 2017 for patients with a new painful condition who had not received an opioid prescription within the past year.Main outcomes and measuresThe association between treatment decisions and 2 dimensions of appointment timing (order of appointment occurrence and delay relative to scheduled start time) were assessed. The rates of opioid prescribing were measured and compared with rates of nonopioid pain medication (ie, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) prescribing and referral to physical therapy. All rates were estimated within the same physician using physician fixed effects, adjusting for patient, appointment, and seasonal characteristics.ResultsAmong 678 319 primary care appointments (642 262 patients; 392 422 [61.1%] women) with 5603 primary care physicians, the likelihood that an appointment resulted in an opioid prescription increased by 33% as the workday progressed (1st to 3rd appointment, 4.0% [95% CI, 3.9%-4.1%] vs 19th to 21st appointment, 5.3% [95% CI. 5.1%-5.6%]; P < .001) and by 17% as appointments ran behind schedule (0-9 minutes late, 4.4% [95% CI, 4.3%-4.6%] vs ≥60 minutes late, 5.2% [95% CI, 5.0%-5.4%]; P < .001). Prescribing of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and referral to physical therapy did not display similar patterns.Conclusions and relevanceThese findings suggest that, even within an individual physician's schedule, clinical decision-making for opioid prescribing varies by the timing and lateness of appointments.

Project description:OBJECTIVE:This study examined opioid prescription initiation patterns and their association with short-term and long-term opioid use among opioid-naïve patients. DESIGN:This study was designed as a retrospective cohort study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS:In this study, we analysed the prescription databases of tertiary hospitals in Malaysia. This study included patients aged ?18 years with at least one opioid prescription (buprenorphine, morphine, oxycodone, fentanyl, dihydrocodeine or tramadol) between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2016. These patients had no opioid prescriptions in the 365 days prior, and were followed up for 365 days after the initial opioid prescription. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:The main outcome measures were the number of short-term (<90 days) and long-term opioid users (?90 days), initial opioid prescription period and daily dose. RESULTS:There were 33?752 opioid-naïve patients who received opioid prescriptions (n=43?432 prescriptions) during the study period. Of these, 29?824 (88.36%) were short-term opioid users and 3928 (11.64%) were long-term opioid users. The majority of these short-term (99.09%) and long-term users (96.18%) received an initial daily opioid dose of <50?mg/day with a short-acting opioid formulation. Short-term opioid users were predominantly prescribed opioids for 3-7 days (59.06%) by the emergency department (ED, 60.56%), while long-term opioid users were primarily prescribed opioids for ?7 days (91.85%) by non-ED hospital departments (91.8%). The adjusted model showed that the following were associated with long-term opioid use: increasing opioid daily doses, prescription period ?7 days and long-acting opioids initiated by non-EDs. CONCLUSIONS:The majority of opioid-naïve patients in tertiary hospital settings in Malaysia were prescribed opioids for short-term use. The progression to long-term use among opioid-naïve patients was attributed to the prescription of higher opioid doses for a longer duration as well as long-acting opioids initiated by non-ED hospital departments.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Palivizumab provides passive immunity for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), but poor adherence compromises protection. A hospital initiative promoted administration of first palivizumab doses at an outpatient clinic immediately after discharge. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the impact of the initiative on location and timing of first palivizumab dose, patient adherence, reimbursement, acquisition cost and RSV-positive hospital readmissions. METHODS:This retrospective cohort study included pediatric patients who received palivizumab from 2012 to 2016. Three groups were compared: "before initiative," "transition" and "after initiative." Patients who did not qualify for palivizumab or who were eligible for palivizumab in previous RSV seasons were excluded. Multivariable logistic and linear regressions adjusted for patients' characteristics were used in outcome analysis. RESULTS:After adjusting for patients' characteristics, there was a 13.5-fold (95% confidence interval: 5.9-30.5, P < 0.0001) increase in odds that patients would receive outpatient administration of palivizumab and 2.7-fold (95% confidence interval: 1.3-5.7, P = 0.0103) increase in odds of receiving the second dose within 35 days after initiative implementation compared with before. Although there was no significant difference in reimbursement percentage after initiative implementation (32% ± 30% after initiative and 31% ± 22% before), calculated palivizumab acquisition costs were 20.8% lower. RSV readmissions were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS:Implementation of an initiative with defined workflow, multidisciplinary collaboration, and early case management efforts to obtain insurance authorization increased outpatient administration of first palivizumab doses. Patient adherence improved as demonstrated by more timely receipt of the second palivizumab dose. There was no difference in reimbursement; however, acquisition cost decreased which is valuable considering low reimbursement rates. RSV-positive readmissions did not change significantly.