Dataset Information

Comparing oculomotor efficiency and visual attention between drivers and non-drivers through the Adult Developmental Eye Movement (ADEM) test: A visual-verbal test.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

The objective of this study was to assess and compare drivers' and non-drivers' outcomes in the Adult Developmental Eye Movement test (ADEM), a visual-verbal test that measures the time needed to read series of numbers in both a vertical and horizontal reading pattern. A set of driving parameters (i.e., experience, risk exposure, and day and night perceived difficulty) and demographic variables (i.e., age, gender, and academic level) were considered as potential predictors of the test performance.

Methods

For this cross-sectional study, 302 healthy subjects (age range 20 to 86 years old) completed a self-reported questionnaire aimed at retrieving data on the independent variables, and underwent the ADEM in order to obtain the dependent outcomes. 214 (70.9%) of the participants were drivers. Non-parametric analyses and multilevel linear regression were used to assess differences between the variables and a prediction model. Also, some correlations were evaluated through the Spearman test.

Results

Drivers showed significantly better test performance than non-drivers. The age, driving experience, and perceived difficulty in driving at night were obtained as potential predictors of the test performance with the applied linear regression model.

Conclusion

The ADEM may be a practical, non-expensive, easy-to-apply tool in the assessment of drivers, useful for obtaining or renewing the driving license. This test may help in the detection of impairments in the saccadic efficiency that could have a detrimental effect on the driving performance.

SUBMITTER: Gene-Sampedro A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7864424 | biostudies-literature | 2021

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparing oculomotor efficiency and visual attention between drivers and non-drivers through the Adult Developmental Eye Movement (ADEM) test: A visual-verbal test.

Gené-Sampedro Andrés A Alonso Francisco F Sánchez-Ramos Celia C Useche Sergio A SA

PloS one 20210205 2

<h4>Objective</h4>The objective of this study was to assess and compare drivers' and non-drivers' outcomes in the Adult Developmental Eye Movement test (ADEM), a visual-verbal test that measures the time needed to read series of numbers in both a vertical and horizontal reading pattern. A set of driving parameters (i.e., experience, risk exposure, and day and night perceived difficulty) and demographic variables (i.e., age, gender, and academic level) were considered as potential predictors of t ...[more]

PMID: 33544763

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundEye Movement Perimetry (EMP) uses Saccadic Eye Movement (SEM) responses for visual field evaluation. Previous studies have demonstrated significant delay in initiation of SEMs among glaucoma patients in comparison with healthy subjects. The aim of the current study was to develop an EMP-based screening grid to identify glaucomatous visual field defects.MethodsAn interactive test consisting of 36 locations and two stimulus contrasts (162 cd/m2 and 190 cd/m2 on a background of 140 cd/m2) was evaluated in 54 healthy subjects and 50 primary glaucoma patients. Each subject was presented a central fixation target combined with the random projection of Goldmann size III peripheral targets. Instructions were given to look at each peripheral target on detection and then re-fixate at the central fixation target while the saccades were assessed using an eye tracker. From each seen peripheral target, the Saccadic Reaction Time (SRT) was calculated for contrast level 162 cd/ m2. These values were used to plot Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves for each test locations and the Area Under the Curve (AUC) values were used to identify the locations with highest susceptibility to glaucomatous damage. Each stimulus location with an AUC less than 0.75 along with its mirrored test location around the horizontal axis were eliminated from the grid.ResultsThe mean age was 48.1 ± 16.6 years and 50.0 ± 14.5 years for healthy subjects and glaucoma patients respectively. A significant increase of SRT values by 76.5% (p < 0.001) was found in glaucoma patients in comparison with the healthy subjects. From the ROC analysis, ten out of 36 locations meeting the cut-off criteria of AUC were eliminated resulting in a new grid containing 26 test locations. SRT values were significantly different (p < 0.05) between the healthy subjects and glaucoma irrespective of the grids used.ConclusionsThe present study resulted in a screening grid consisting of 26 locations predominantly testing nasal, superior and inferior areas of the visual field. An internal validation of the modified grid showed 90.4% of screening accuracy which makes it a potential approach for population based glaucoma screening.

Project description:The aim of this study was to search for oculomotor correlates of expertise in visual arts, in particular with regard to paintings. Achieving this goal was possible by gathering data on eye movements of two groups of participants: experts and non-experts in visual arts who viewed and appreciated the aesthetics of paintings. In particular, we were interested in whether visual arts experts more accurately recognize a balanced composition in one of the two paintings being compared simultaneously, and whether people who correctly recognize harmonious paintings are characterized by a different visual scanning strategy than those who do not recognize them. For the purposes of this study, 25 paintings with an almost ideal balanced composition have been chosen. Some of these paintings are masterpieces of the world cultural heritage, and some of them are unknown. Using Photoshop, the artist developed three additional versions of each of these paintings, differing from the original in the degree of destruction of its harmonious composition: slight, moderate, or significant. The task of the participants was to look at all versions of the same painting in pairs (including the original) and decide which of them looked more pleasing. The study involved 23 experts in art, students of art history, art education or the Academy of Fine Arts, and 19 non-experts, students in the social sciences and the humanities. The experimental manipulation of comparing pairs of paintings, whose composition is at different levels of harmony, has proved to be an effective tool for differentiating people because of their ability to distinguish paintings with balanced composition from an unbalanced one. It turned out that this ability only partly coincides with expertise understood as the effect of education in the field of visual arts. We also found that the eye movements of people who more accurately appreciated paintings with balanced composition differ from those who more liked their altered versions due to dwell time, first and average fixation duration and number of fixations. The familiarity of paintings turned out to be the factor significantly affects both the aesthetic evaluation of paintings and eye movement.

Dataset Information

Comparing oculomotor efficiency and visual attention between drivers and non-drivers through the Adult Developmental Eye Movement (ADEM) test: A visual-verbal test.

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Comparing oculomotor efficiency and visual attention between drivers and non-drivers through the Adult Developmental Eye Movement (ADEM) test: A visual-verbal test.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets