Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Public Perspectives on Anti-Diabetic Drugs: Exploratory Analysis of Twitter Posts.


ABSTRACT:

Background

Diabetes mellitus is a major global public health issue where self-management is critical to reducing disease burden. Social media has been a powerful tool to understand public perceptions. Public perception of the drugs used for the treatment of diabetes may be useful for orienting interventions to increase adherence.

Objective

The aim of this study was to explore the public perceptions of anti-diabetic drugs through the analysis of health-related tweets mentioning such medications.

Methods

This study uses an infoveillance social listening approach to monitor public discourse using Twitter data. We coded 4000 tweets from January 1, 2019 to October 1, 2019 containing key terms related to anti-diabetic drugs by using qualitative content analysis. Tweets were coded for whether they were truly about an anti-diabetic drug and whether they were health-related. Health-related tweets were further coded based on who was tweeting, which anti-diabetic drug was being tweeted about, and the content discussed in the tweet. The main outcome of the analysis was the themes identified by analyzing the content of health-related tweets on anti-diabetic drugs.

Results

We identified 1664 health-related tweets on 33 anti-diabetic drugs. A quarter (415/1664) of the tweets were confirmed to have been from people with diabetes, 17.9% (298/1664) from people posting about someone else, and 2.7% (45/1664) from health care professionals. However, the role of the tweeter was unidentifiable in two-thirds of the tweets. We identified 13 themes, with the health consequences of the cost of anti-diabetic drugs being the most extensively discussed, followed by the efficacy and availability. We also identified issues that patients may conceal from health care professionals, such as purchasing medications from unofficial sources.

Conclusions

This study uses an infoveillance approach using Twitter data to explore public perceptions related to anti-diabetic drugs. This analysis gives an insight into the real-life issues that an individual faces when taking anti-diabetic drugs, and such findings may be incorporated into health policies to improve compliance and efficacy. This study suggests that there is a fear of not having access to anti-diabetic drugs due to cost or physical availability and highlights the impact of the sacrifices made to access anti-diabetic drugs. Along with screening for diabetes-related health issues, health care professionals should also ask their patients about any non-health-related concerns regarding their anti-diabetic drugs. The positive tweets about dietary changes indicate that people with type 2 diabetes may be more open to self-management than what the health care professionals believe.

SUBMITTER: Golder S 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7872831 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Public Perspectives on Anti-Diabetic Drugs: Exploratory Analysis of Twitter Posts.

Golder Su S   Bach Millie M   O'Connor Karen K   Gross Robert R   Hennessy Sean S   Gonzalez Hernandez Graciela G  

JMIR diabetes 20210126 1


<h4>Background</h4>Diabetes mellitus is a major global public health issue where self-management is critical to reducing disease burden. Social media has been a powerful tool to understand public perceptions. Public perception of the drugs used for the treatment of diabetes may be useful for orienting interventions to increase adherence.<h4>Objective</h4>The aim of this study was to explore the public perceptions of anti-diabetic drugs through the analysis of health-related tweets mentioning suc  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC10248327 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9412204 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6579902 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6693487 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8517966 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6277830 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6676793 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8160798 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7330876 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10610639 | biostudies-literature