Dataset Information

Genetically determined blood pressure, antihypertensive medications, and risk of Alzheimer's disease: a Mendelian randomization study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Observational studies suggest that the use of antihypertensive medications (AHMs) is associated with a reduced risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD); however, these findings may be biased by confounding and reverse causality. We aimed to explore the effects of blood pressure (BP) and lowering systolic BP (SBP) via the protein targets of different AHMs on AD through a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) approach.

Methods

Genetic proxies from genome-wide association studies of BP traits and BP-lowering variants in genes encoding AHM targets were extracted. Estimates were calculated by inverse-variance weighted method as the main model. MR Egger regression and leave-one-out analysis were performed to identify potential violations.

Results

There was limited evidence that genetically predicted SBP/diastolic BP level affected AD risk based on 400/398 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), respectively (all P > 0.05). Suitable genetic variants for β-blockers (1 SNP), angiotensin receptor blockers (1 SNP), calcium channel blockers (CCBs, 45 SNPs), and thiazide diuretics (5 SNPs) were identified. Genetic proxies for CCB [odds ratio (OR) = 0.959, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.941-0.977, P = 3.92 × 10^-6] and overall use of AHMs (OR = 0.961, 95% CI = 0.944-0.978, P = 5.74 × 10^-6, SNPs = 52) were associated with a lower risk of AD. No notable heterogeneity and directional pleiotropy were identified (all P > 0.05). Additional analyses partly support these results. No single SNP was driving the observed effects.

Conclusions

This MR analysis found evidence that genetically determined lowering BP was associated with a lower risk of AD and CCB was identified as a promising strategy for AD prevention.

SUBMITTER: Ou YN

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7874453 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background: Positive associations between inflammatory biomarkers and the risk of heart failure (HF) have been reported in conventional observational studies. However, the causal effects of inflammatory biomarkers on HF have not been fully elucidated. We conducted a Mendelian randomization (MR) study to examine the possible etiological roles of inflammatory biomarkers in HF. Methods: Summary statistical data for the associations between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and C-reactive protein (CRP), fibrinogen, and components of the interleukin-1 (IL-1)-interleukin-6 (IL-6) inflammatory signaling pathway, namely, interleukin-1β (IL-1β), IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra), IL-6, and soluble IL-6 receptor (sIL-6r), were obtained from genome-wide association studies (GWASs) for individuals of European descent. The GWAS dataset of 977,323 participants of European ancestry, which included 47,309 HF cases and 930,014 controls, was collected to identify genetic variants underlying HF. A two-sample Mendelian randomization framework was implemented to examine the causality of the association between these inflammatory biomarkers and HF. Results: Our MR analyses found that genetically determined CRP and fibrinogen were not causally associated with HF risk (odds ratio [OR] = 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.84-1.02, p = 0.15; OR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.55-1.58, p = 0.80, respectively). These findings remained consistent using different Mendelian randomization methods and in sensitivity analyses. For the IL-1-IL-6 pathway, causal estimates for IL-6 (OR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.81-0.91, p < 0.001), but not for IL-1β, IL-1ra, or sIL-6r, were significant. However, the association between genetically determined IL-6 and HF risk became non-significant after excluding SNPs with potential pleiotropy (OR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.77-1.03, p = 0.12). Conclusion: Our study did not identify convincing evidence to support that CRP and fibrinogen, together with their upstream IL-1-IL-6 signaling pathway, were causally associated with HF risk.