Dataset Information

Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy or tamoxifen-alone on the ovarian reserve of young women with breast cancer.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

To determine the longitudinal impact of adjuvant chemotherapy and tamoxifen-only treatments on the reproductive potential of women with breast cancer by using a sensitive ovarian reserve marker anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) as a surrogate.

Methods

One-hundred-and-forty-two women with a primary diagnosis of breast cancer were prospectively followed with serum AMH assessments before the initiation, and 12, 18 and 24 months after the completion of adjuvant chemotherapy or the start of tamoxifen-only treatment. The chemotherapy regimens were classified into Anthracycline-Cyclophosphamide-based (AC-based) and Cyclophosphamide-Methotrexate + 5-Fluorouracil (CMF). Longitudinal data were analyzed by mixed effects model for treatment effects over time, adjusting for baseline age and BMI.

Results

Both chemotherapy regimens resulted in significant decline in ovarian reserve compared to the tamoxifen-only treatment (p < 0.0001 either regimen vs. tamoxifen for overall trend). AMH levels sharply declined at 12 months but did not show a significant recovery from 12 to 18 and 18 to 24 months after the completion of AC-based or CMF regimens. The degree of decline did not differ between the two chemotherapy groups (p = 0.53). In contrast, tamoxifen-only treatment did not significantly alter the age-adjusted serum AMH levels over the 24-month follow up. Likewise, the use of adjuvant tamoxifen following AC-based regimens did not affect AMH recovery.

Conclusions

Both AC-based regimens and CMF significantly compromise ovarian reserve, without a recovery beyond 12 months post-chemotherapy. In contrast, tamoxifen-only treatment does not seem to alter ovarian reserve. These data indicate that the commonly used chemotherapy regimens but not the hormonal therapy compromise future reproductive potential.

SUBMITTER: Goldfarb SB

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7877450 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAs a special reproductive hormone and ovarian reserve indicator, the role of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) in premenopausal women with breast cancer deserves further study.MethodsWe conducted an in-depth analysis of the data from the EGOFACT study (NCT02518191), a phase Ⅲ, randomized, controlled trial involving premenopausal female breast cancer patients in two parallel groups: chemotherapy with or without gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs (GnRHa). Three hundred thirty premenopausal women aged 25-49 years with operable stage I to III breast cancer were included in this study. The characteristics of ovarian reserve changes marked by AMH in the EGOFACT study and the factors affecting ovarian function in premenopausal women with breast cancer were analyzed.ResultsThe AMH level of the chemotherapy alone group decreased gradually within one year, while the AMH level of the GnRHa group was significantly higher as early as 6 months after chemotherapy and recovered to close to the baseline level 12 months after chemotherapy (F = 34.991, P < 0.001). Correlation analysis showed that the factors affecting AMH levels mainly included age, menarche age, body mass index (BMI), reproductive history, baseline follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) level, pathological stage and GnRHa application, but they had different effects on the incidence of premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) at different periods. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that menarche age younger than 14 years (OR 0.470 [0.259, 0.852], P = 0.013), baseline AMH level higher than 0.5 ng/mL (OR 9.590 [3.366, 27.320], P < 0.001), pathological stage Ⅰ(OR 0.315 [0.124, 0.798], P = 0.015) and GnRHa application (OR 0.090 [0.045, 0.183], P < 0.001) were independent factors conducive to protection of ovarian reserve, as well as to recovery of ovarian reserve.ConclusionsAge, menarche age, baseline AMH level, and GnRHa application are the most important influencing factors for ovarian reserve in premenopausal women with breast cancer.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02518191, registered on Aug 5, 2015.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Ovarian failure is a common toxic effect of chemotherapy. Studies of the use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists to protect ovarian function have shown mixed results and lack data on pregnancy outcomes. METHODS:We randomly assigned 257 premenopausal women with operable hormone-receptor-negative breast cancer to receive standard chemotherapy with the GnRH agonist goserelin (goserelin group) or standard chemotherapy without goserelin (chemotherapy-alone group). The primary study end point was the rate of ovarian failure at 2 years, with ovarian failure defined as the absence of menses in the preceding 6 months and levels of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) in the postmenopausal range. Rates were compared with the use of conditional logistic regression. Secondary end points included pregnancy outcomes and disease-free and overall survival. RESULTS:At baseline, 218 patients were eligible and could be evaluated. Among 135 with complete primary end-point data, the ovarian failure rate was 8% in the goserelin group and 22% in the chemotherapy-alone group (odds ratio, 0.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.09 to 0.97; two-sided P=0.04). Owing to missing primary end-point data, sensitivity analyses were performed, and the results were consistent with the main findings. Missing data did not differ according to treatment group or according to the stratification factors of age and planned chemotherapy regimen. Among the 218 patients who could be evaluated, pregnancy occurred in more women in the goserelin group than in the chemotherapy-alone group (21% vs. 11%, P=0.03); women in the goserelin group also had improved disease-free survival (P=0.04) and overall survival (P=0.05). CONCLUSIONS:Although missing data weaken interpretation of the findings, administration of goserelin with chemotherapy appeared to protect against ovarian failure, reducing the risk of early menopause and improving prospects for fertility. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and others; POEMS/S0230 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00068601.).

Project description:BackgroundThe aromatase inhibitor letrozole, as compared with tamoxifen, improves disease-free survival among postmenopausal women with receptor-positive early breast cancer. It is unknown whether sequential treatment with tamoxifen and letrozole is superior to letrozole therapy alone.MethodsIn this randomized, phase 3, double-blind trial of the treatment of hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women, we randomly assigned women to receive 5 years of tamoxifen monotherapy, 5 years of letrozole monotherapy, or 2 years of treatment with one agent followed by 3 years of treatment with the other. We compared the sequential treatments with letrozole monotherapy among 6182 women and also report a protocol-specified updated analysis of letrozole versus tamoxifen monotherapy in 4922 women.ResultsAt a median follow-up of 71 months after randomization, disease-free survival was not significantly improved with either sequential treatment as compared with letrozole alone (hazard ratio for tamoxifen followed by letrozole, 1.05; 99% confidence interval [CI], 0.84 to 1.32; hazard ratio for letrozole followed by tamoxifen, 0.96; 99% CI, 0.76 to 1.21). There were more early relapses among women who were assigned to tamoxifen followed by letrozole than among those who were assigned to letrozole alone. The updated analysis of monotherapy showed that there was a nonsignificant difference in overall survival between women assigned to treatment with letrozole and those assigned to treatment with tamoxifen (hazard ratio for letrozole, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.02; P=0.08). The rate of adverse events was as expected on the basis of previous reports of letrozole and tamoxifen therapy.ConclusionsAmong postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive breast cancer, sequential treatment with letrozole and tamoxifen, as compared with letrozole monotherapy, did not improve disease-free survival. The difference in overall survival with letrozole monotherapy and tamoxifen monotherapy was not statistically significant. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00004205.)