Dataset Information

Impact of multimorbidity and polypharmacy on the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: insights from the BALKAN-AF survey.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

We investigated the impact of multimorbidity and polypharmacy on the management of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients in clinical practice and assessed factors associated with polypharmacy and oral anticoagulation (OAC) use in AF patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy.

Methods

A 14-week prospective study of consecutive non-valvular AF patients was performed in seven Balkan countries.

Results

Of 2712 consecutive patients, 2263 patients (83.4%) had multimorbidity (AF + ≥2 concomitant diseases) and 1505 patients (55.5%) had polypharmacy. 1416 (52.2%) patients had both multimorbidity and polypharmacy. Overall, 1164 (82.2%) patients received OAC, 200 (14.1%) patients received antiplatelet drugs alone and 52 (3.7%) patients had no antithrombotic therapy (AT). Non-emergency centre and paroxysmal AF were significantly associated with OAC non-use in patients with multimorbidity, whilst age ≥80 years and non-emergency centre were identified to be independent predictors of OAC non-use in patients with polypharmacy.

Conclusions

Multimorbidity and polypharmacy were common among AF patients in our study. AT was suboptimal and approximately 18% of multimorbid patients with polypharmacy were not anticoagulated. Pattern of AF and non-emergency centre were associated with OAC non-use in AF patients with multimorbidity, whilst non-emergency centre and age ≥80 years were associated with OAC non-use in AF patients with polypharmacy. Key Message Multimorbidity and polypharmacy are common among patients with AF. Antithrombotic therapy was suboptimal in AF patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy. Approximately, 18% of multimorbid patients with polypharmacy were not anticoagulated.

SUBMITTER: Koziel M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7877933 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background and objectsFew studies focus on multimorbidity and polypharmacy in Chinese atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. We examined the impact of multimorbidity, polypharmacy, and treatment strategies on outcomes in Chinese emergency department (ED)AF patients. We also assessed factors associated with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) non-use in AF patients with multimorbidity or polypharmacy.Methods2015 AF patients who presented to emergency department (ED) were enrolled from Nov 2008 to Oct 2011, mean follow-up of 12-months. Cox regressions were performed to identify the impact of multimorbidity and polypharmacy on clinical outcomes.ResultsSix hundred and sixty-five patients in low morbidity group (≤1 comorbidity), 608 patients in moderate morbidity group (2 comorbidities), 742 patients in high morbidity group (≥3 comorbidities). Five hundred and seventy patients (28.3%) had polypharmacy (≥5 medications). High and moderate morbidity groups were significantly associated with a higher risk of all-cause death (HR 2.083, 95%CI 1.482-2.929; HR 1.713, 95%CI 1.198-2.449), CV death (HR 2.457, 95%CI 1.526-3.954; HR 1.974, 95%CI 1.206-3.232) and major bleeding (HR 4.126, 95%CI 1.022-16.664; HR 6.142, 95%CI 1.6789-22.369) compared with low morbidity group. In VKA subgroup, only high morbidity group was associated with a higher risk of all-cause death (HR 2.521, 95%CI 1.482-2.929), but not significantly in other events. For polypharmacy category, there were no significant statistics among these endpoints. Coronary artery disease (CAD), hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and antiplatelet therapy were independent predictors for VKA non-use in whole cohort, and patients with multimorbidity. CAD and antiplatelet therapy were independent predictors for VKA non-use in patients with polypharmacy.ConclusionMultimorbidity was associated with worse outcomes in Chinese ED AF patients. Polypharmacy showed no significant statistics among these outcomes. CAD and antiplatelet therapy were independent risk factors of VKA non-use in Chinese ED AF patients with multimorbidity or polypharmacy.

Project description:IntroductionA multidisciplinary approach is needed for the management of atrial fibrillation (AF) in which the patient has a central role. Smart devices create opportunities to improve AF management. This paper aimed to evaluate the in-house developed AF-EduApp application on its usability, satisfaction, and communication effectiveness with the care team.MethodsDuring a multicenter, prospective randomized controlled trial, 153 AF patients were included in the AF-EduApp study, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months and a maximum follow-up of 15 months if taking oral anticoagulation (OAC). The AF-EduApp contains six main modules: Questionnaires, Education, Measurement data entry, Medication overview with reminders, Appointments, and Communication with the care team. The App focuses on four main goals: (1) to improve AF knowledge, (2) to increase self-care capabilities, (3) electronic monitoring to improve therapy adherence to OAC, and (4) communication with the care team. Patients unable to use the AF-EduApp were assigned to a no-App control group (n = 41) without intervention comparable to the standard care group (SC, n = 346) of the AF-EduCare study.ResultsA total of 152 patients effectively used the App during a mean follow-up of 386.8 ± 108. 1 days (one included patient could not install the application due to an iPhone from the United States). They opened the application on average on 130.1 ± 144.7 days. Of the 109 patients still in follow-up after 12 months (i.e. patients who did not withdraw and on OAC), 90 patients (82.6%) actively used the application at least one day in the next 41 days. The Measurement module was the most used, with a median of used days over the total available days of 6.4%. A total of 75 App patients (49.3%) asked questions, mostly clinical-related questions (e.g. medication use, or actionability on clinical entered parameters). A mean score of 8.1 ± 1.7 about the "perceived quality of follow-up in the past year" was given by the App ITT patients, compared to a score of 7.7 ± 2.0 by the SC group (P = .072). Patients who used the App were more attracted to future follow-up with an application compared to patients who would be capable of using the application of the SC group (31.6% vs. 12.5%; P < .001).ConclusionThis study showed a positive attitude towards using a mobile application, with AF patients using the application one-third of the available days. Patients used the App most for entering measured parameters, and to contact the care team.