Dataset Information

Benefits of early aggressive immunomodulatory therapy (tocilizumab and methylprednisolone) in COVID-19: Single center cohort study of 685 patients.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

A growing evidence suggests that immune dysregulation and thrombotic phenomena are key features in the pathophysiology of COVID-19. Apart from antivirals and respiratory support, anticoagulants, corticoids and immunomodulators are increasingly being prescribed, especially for more severe cases. We describe the clinical outcome of a large cohort of patients preferentially treated with glucocorticoids and interleukin inhibitors.

Methods

Single center and retrospective case series. Adult patients admitted with COVID-19 related respiratory insufficiency were included. Patients who died within 2 days after admission and those testing positive but asymptomatic were excluded. We defined two study periods: from March 3rd to March 31 st, 2020 (beginning of epidemic until peak of incidence) and April 1 st to May 7 th, 2020 (second half of epidemic). The majority of patients received respiratory support, combinations of antimicrobials, anticoagulants, corticoids and interleukin inhibitors. Antivirals were preferentially given in the first period. The clinical outcome (death and ventilator dependency) of both periods was compared.

Results

From March 3 rd to May 7 th, 685 patients were included for analysis (58.4% males, mean age 68.9 years). Patients in the first period (n = 408) were younger (66.6 vs 71.1 years, p = 0.003), presented lower mean P a O 2/F i O2 ratio at admission (256.5 vs 270.4 mm Hg,p = 0.0563), higher ferritin (1520 vs 1221 ng/ml, p = 0.01), higher IL-6 (679 vs 194 pg/ml, p < 0.0001) and similar D-dimer levels (3.59 vs 3.39 μg/mL, p = 0.65) compared to the second period (n = 277). Lopinavir/ritonavir and interferon were preferentially given in the first period (23.8% and 32% vs 1.8% and 11.9%, p < 0.0001). Use of corticoids (88.2% vs 87.4%, p = 0,74) and tocilizumab (26.29 vs 20.22% p = 0.06) were similarly administered in both periods. Patients in the second period needed less mechanical ventilation (4.9% vs 16.9%, p < 0.0001), fewer ICU admission (6.1% vs 20.1%,p < 0.0001) and showed similar mortality (17.7% vs 15.4%, p = 0.43). Infectious and thrombotic complications were comparable in both periods (both around 8%, with no statistical difference). Patients treated with tocilizumab (n = 163) had lower mortality rate compared to those untreated under the same indication (7.9% vs 24.2%, p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

In this large retrospective COVID-19 in-hospital cohort, lopinavir/ritonavir and interferon showed no significant impact on survival. Extensive use of corticosteroids and tocilizumab resulted in good overall outcome and showed acceptable complication rates.

SUBMITTER: Luis BM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7879932 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background Dysthyroid optic neuropathy (DON) is a serious threatening vision loss in Graves’ ophthalmopathy (GO). Although the European Group on Graves’ Ophthalmopathy (EUGOGO) recommend intravenous methylprednisolone therapy for first line treatment, some characteristics predicting the response are still inconclusive. Aim To study the efficacy of intravenous pulse methylprednisolone (IVMP) in treating dysthyroid optic neuropathy (DON) and to identify factors predicting poor response to the treatment. Methods All patients diagnosed with DON between January 2010 and December 2021 at Rajavithi Hospital, Thailand, receiving IVMP 1 g/ day for 3 consecutive days were analyzed. The efficacy at 1 week and 3, 6, 12-months in terms of improvement of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and proptosis were compiled. Results Of the entire 57 DON cases that received IVMP, 50.9% gained at least 0.2 Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR) at 1 week, and the improvement from initial to 1-week BCVA was 0.63 ± 0.63 logMAR (p < 0.001) and the decrease in proptosis was 1.8 ± 1.36 mm (p < 0.001). The remaining 23 orbits underwent orbital decompression and were excluded from the long-term efficacy analysis. In the last 12-months’ follow-up time, there was an improvement of BCVA (0.53 ± 0.47 logMAR) and proptosis (0.59 ± 0.66 mm) (both p < 0.001). At last visit, there was an improvement of BCVA (0.2 logMAR) and proptosis (2 mm) in 76.5, and 5.9% respectively. Significant predictive factors of poor treatment response were age ≥ 55 years (odds ratio [OR]: 8.28, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.368–50.121, p = 0.021); longer onset duration before treatment (OR: 5.10, 95%CI: 1.061–24.501, p = 0.042); and proptosis at baseline (OR: 9.31, 95%CI: 1.872–46.280, p = 0.006). The strongest risk factor for predicting poor response to IVMP was poor initial visual acuity (OR: 10.26, 95%CI: 1.363–77.234, p = 0.024). Conclusions IVMP is effective for both short- and long-term treatment to improve visual acuity greater than proptosis. Older age, longer disease duration, poor initial visual acuity, and proptotic orbits were identified as risk factors for predicting poor response to IVMP treatment in Thai population. DON patients having those risk factors should be suspected, and treated early with IVMP to preserve their future vision. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12886-023-02789-5.

Project description:This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of tocilizumab use for the treatment of active steroid-resistant Graves' orbitopathy (GO). A retrospective longitudinal study was conducted by reviewing the medical records at a single center between November 2009 and December 2018. A total of 114 patients with steroid-resistant Graves' orbitopathy were examined and treated with tocilizumab, of which 54 adults met the inclusion criteria. No concomitant medication for the treatment of orbitopathy was used. The main primary outcomes included changes from baseline in the Clinical Activity Score (CAS) and thyrotropin receptor antibody (TRAb) levels throughout therapy with tocilizumab. The absolute responses to treatment were defined as the achievement of CAS ≤ 1 and TRAb ≤ 10 U/L. A composite ophthalmic score including CAS, proptosis, eyelid retraction, and diplopia was used to evaluate individual improvement in GO. Adverse drug reactions were also assessed. Analysis of the patient's CAS and TRAb levels showed meaningful reductions during tocilizumab treatment. Differences between values at baseline and subsequent time points were statistically significant (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). The absolute CAS response (CAS = 0 or 1) was achieved in 74% (37/50) of patients after the fourth dose of tocilizumab (at week 16), with a TRAb response being achieved in 55% (23/42) of patients. The relative CAS response (reduction ≥ 2 points) was achieved in 90.9% of patients (40/44) after the first dose of tocilizumab (at week 4). Measurements of proptosis (reduction ≥ 2 mm in 78% of patients, 42/54) and eyelid retraction (reduction ≥ 2 mm in 75%, 33/44), and the prevalence of diplopia (improvement in 68%, 19/28) were significantly reduced after the last dose of tocilizumab (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). GO improved in 98% (53/54) of patients when at least two criteria of the composite evaluation were required. Four patients exhibited disease recurrence, defined as an increase in CAS of ≥2 points in the six months following the date of inactivation. Most adverse drug reactions were mild or moderate in severity. In conclusion, our data suggest that a course of at least 4 months (one monthly dose) of tocilizumab therapy provides a significant benefit to patients with active moderate-to-severe steroid-resistant GO.