Dataset Information

Using the Timmer Scale to Standardize Pediatric Dentistry Residents' Scientific Appraisal Skills.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

There is no consensus on the best methodology to apply evidence-based practice principles to develop a systematic approach to improve critical appraisal or research design evaluation skills in advanced education journal clubs.

Methods

We implemented a tool-based approach for our pediatric dentistry residents' journal club centered on the use of a study quality assessment tool, the Timmer scale. The tool consisted of 19 standard questions that evaluated the research methodology, data collection, statistical analysis, and reporting of the findings of each article. Learners first underwent a 4-hour training session on study quality assessment. They were then assigned to read articles from monthly issues of core journals and appraised the quality of each article using the Timmer scale and submitted their scores in advance of the group session. Then, during a 1-hour journal club, the group came to a consensus on the Timmer scale score, and group and individual scores were compared to the course director's scores as prompts for feedback and further discussion.

Results

Over 3 years, 24 pediatric dentistry residents participated in the course. A noticeable improvement in the pediatric dentistry residents' performance was noticed, with the discrepancy between their scores and group scores improving over time.

Discussion

Using a quality assessment tool in journal clubs appeared to improve the residents' ability to critically assess articles in a systematic way. Additionally, the tool was useful for assessing residents' performance over time.

SUBMITTER: Omar S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7880256 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Using the Timmer Scale to Standardize Pediatric Dentistry Residents' Scientific Appraisal Skills.

Omar Samah S Bauer Janet J Matin Afsaneh A Bians Amanjyot A Chen Jung-Wei JW Ocampo Monica M

MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources 20210212

<h4>Introduction</h4>There is no consensus on the best methodology to apply evidence-based practice principles to develop a systematic approach to improve critical appraisal or research design evaluation skills in advanced education journal clubs.<h4>Methods</h4>We implemented a tool-based approach for our pediatric dentistry residents' journal club centered on the use of a study quality assessment tool, the Timmer scale. The tool consisted of 19 standard questions that evaluated the research me ...[more]

PMID: 33598542

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundMedical research is a central part of any residency training. In view of the new Saudi orthopedic committee promotion regulation that mandates each resident to participate in a research project, the challenges that stand in the way of completion of substantial research within surgical residency must be investigated. The aim of this study was to assess the practice, attitudes, perception, and limitations associated with research among residents in the Saudi orthopedic program in the central region.MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted between June and July 2020 using an online-based survey. The total number of study participants was 128 orthopedic residents out of the 191 residents enrolled in the central region program. Data were analyzed, and descriptive statistics in the form of frequency and percentage were determined, analytical tests were performed with P < 0.05 being statistically significant.ResultsMost residents (95 %) participated in a research project during residency. Most projects (53.10 %) were case reports followed by retrospective studies (48.40 %). The majority (79.70 %) did not attend a research methods course during residency. Experience in research differed significantly (P < 0.05) by age, residency year, and center. The mean involvement score was significantly higher among males at 3 (± 1) than among females at 2 (± 0) (P < 0.001). Only 40.60 % have access to orthopedic journals, and the same percentage (40.60 %) knew how to Critique original articles. There was a statistically significant difference in the accessibility score according to the training center. Lack of faculty support and mentorship were the main barriers to medical research at 62.50 and 39.10 %, respectively. A total of 68.80 % reported that funding was not available through their institutes.ConclusionsIn Saudi Arabia, the level of meaningful clinical research and publications by orthopedic residents is still low. The results of this study should be taken into consideration before the implementation of the new promotion criteria in the centers under the umbrella of Saudi orthopedic committee.

Project description:BackgroundA systematic quantitative evaluation of the available evidence of the treatment for caries lesions in primary teeth that considers how different caries progressions lead to the need for distinct interventions might provide additional useful information for clinical evidence-based decision making. The aim of this systematic review and network meta-analysis was to verify the effect of the treatments on caries lesion arrestment (CLA) or the success rate (SR) of dentin caries lesion treatments in the primary teeth.MethodsA search was conducted using the MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus databases through December 2017. The primary search terms used in combination were primary teeth, caries lesion and restoration. The grey literature was also screened, as were the reference lists of eligible studies. A search of prospective studies with at least 12 months of follow up that compared different techniques was performed. The exclusion criteria were the absence of a comparison group; no evaluation of different restorative techniques; the evaluation of other outcomes unrelated to this review; and the recruitment of specific patient. The risk of bias was evaluated by the tools: the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and ROBINS-I. A network meta-analyses and meta-analyses were conducted considering CLA or SR as outcomes according to the surface involved and the depth of progression.ResultsOf the 1671 potentially eligible studies, 15 were included. For occlusal surfaces, only two studies presented data regarding the outer half of the dentin, with conventional restorative treatment (CRT) using composite resin showing superior results; five studies presented data regarding the depth of caries lesions, and CRT with compomer resulted in the best results. Seven studies considered occlusoproximal surfaces, and the Hall technique showed the best SR among the evaluated treatments. Finally, two annual applications of silver diamine fluoride showed the best nonrestorative approach to arrest caries lesions on occlusal and smooth surfaces.Discussion/conclusionsThe treatments for dentin caries lesions in primary teeth depend on the depth of progression and the surface involved. However, few of the included studies provided evidence to strongly recommend the best treatment option.OtherFunding: FAPESP; Systematic review registration number-PROSPERO CRD42016037784.

Dataset Information

Using the Timmer Scale to Standardize Pediatric Dentistry Residents' Scientific Appraisal Skills.

Introduction

Methods

Results

Discussion

Publications

Using the Timmer Scale to Standardize Pediatric Dentistry Residents' Scientific Appraisal Skills.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets