Dataset Information

Platinum-Based Treatment for Well- and Poorly Differentiated Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms include well-differentiated tumors (PanNETs) and poorly differentiated carcinomas (PanNECs). Previous reports suggested a role for platinum-based therapy largely in PanNEC. We sought to investigate the role of platinum-based therapy in pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms regardless of tumor grade and differentiation.

Methods

Patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms treated with platinum-based therapy at Memorial Sloan Kettering (1994-2016) and Verona University Hospital (2008-2016) were retrospectively identified. Response to treatment by RECIST v1.1, overall survival, and progression-free survival were defined. Among patients with available tissue, DAXX, ATRX, Rb, and p53 expression was evaluated to support the histologic grade of differentiation.

Results

Fifty PanNETs, 29 PanNECs, and 22 high-grade tumors with undeterminable differentiation were included. No patients achieved complete response. Overall rate of partial response was 31%, 41% for PanNEC, and 20% for PanNETs. Among PanNETs, partial response was achieved in 33% of G1 (2/6), 10% of G2 (2/19), and 24% of G3 (6/25) tumors. Median overall survival was 29.3 months for PanNETs and 10.9 months for PanNEC (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in median progression-free survival (P = 0.2).

Conclusions

Platinum-based therapies demonstrated increased activity in PanNEC; however, promising efficacy was also observed in PanNETs, irrespective of grade.

SUBMITTER: Pulvirenti A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7880539 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms with a Ki-67 labeling index greater than 20% were reclassified in 2017 by the World Health Organization into well differentiated (WD) and poorly differentiated grade 3 neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC). The authors describe the cytologic features of grade 3 WD pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms compared with grade 2 neoplasms and NEC. METHODS:Fine-needle aspirates from 65 pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms were reviewed, and their cytomorphologic features were compared across grade 2, WD grade 3, and PD small cell type (PD-S), large cell type (PD-L), and type not otherwise specified (PD-NOS) neoplasms. RESULTS:The 65 aspirates consisted of 19 grade 2 neoplasms, 32 WD grade 3 neoplasms, and 14 NECs (6 PD-S, 5 PD-L, and 3 PD-NOS). The medians Ki-67 proliferation index was 11% (range, 3.2%-17%) in grade 2 neoplasms, 40% (range, 21%-89%) in WD grade 3 neoplasms, 80% (range, 63%-95%) in PD-S neoplasms, 39% (range, 25%-61%) in PD-L neoplasms, and 70% (range, 30%-80%) in PD-NOS neoplasms. Both grade 2 and WD grade 3 neoplasms were associated with plasmacytoid morphology and smooth nuclear contours, but WD grade 3 neoplasms had significant increases in abundant cytoplasm (72% vs 17%; P = .007), nuclear tangles (75% vs 42%; P = .006), and apoptosis (86% vs 58%; P = .005). Compared with NECs, WD grade 3 neoplasms had increased plasmacytoid morphology (75% vs 7%; P < .001), smooth nuclear contours (94% vs 64%; P = .02), round nuclei (59% vs 21%; P = .01), and less pleomorphism (13% vs 50%; P = .004), molding (9% vs 79%; P < .001), and necrosis (13% vs 43%; P = .003). WD grade 3 neoplasms had less pleomorphism (13% vs 50%; P = .04), less necrosis (13% vs 60%; P = .04), and more plasmacytoid morphology (75% vs 20%; P = .03) than PD-L. CONCLUSIONS:The prevalence of cytologic features differs in WD grade 3 pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms compared with grade 2 neoplasms and NECs, and these differences assist in the recognition of this newly classified entity. Cancer Cytopathol 2018;126:326-35. © 2018 American Cancer Society.

Project description:AimsSpecial AT-rich sequence-binding protein 2 (SATB2) is a transcriptional regulator with critical roles in brain, craniofacial and skeletal development. It has emerged as a key marker of lower gastrointestinal (GI) tract columnar epithelial and osteoblastic differentiation. Transcription factor immunohistochemistry is useful in assigning site of origin in well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours (NETs), and has had a limited role in poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). This study sought to evaluate the role of SATB2 in assigning site of origin in neuroendocrine epithelial neoplasms.Methods and resultsTissue microarrays were constructed from the following: 317 NETs (37 thyroid, 46 lung, 16 stomach, 12 duodenum, 70 pancreas, 106 jejunoileum, 24 appendix, and six rectosigmoid), 44 phaeochromocytomas/paragangliomas, and 79 NECs (29 Merkel cell, 30 lung, and 20 extrapulmonary visceral); nine appendiceal and 19 rectal NETs were examined in whole sections. SATB2 immunohistochemistry was scored for extent (%) and intensity (0-3+), with an H-score being calculated. SATB2 was expressed by 96% of rectosigmoid NETs, 79% of appendiceal NETs, and only 7% of other well-differentiated neoplasms (P < 0.0001). Expression in lower GI tract NETs (median H-score of 255) was stronger than in other positive tumours (median H-score of 7) (P < 0.0001). Any SATB2 expression was 86% sensitive/93% specific for lower GI tract origin. SATB2 was expressed by 79% of Merkel cell carcinomas (median H-score of 300), 33% of lung NECs (median H-score of 23), and 60% of extrapulmonary visceral NECs (median H-score of 110), with stronger expression in Merkel cell carcinoma (P < 0.001). At an H-score cutoff of ≥150, SATB2 was 69% sensitive/90% specific for Merkel cell carcinoma.ConclusionsSATB2 is frequently and strongly expressed by lower GI tract NETs; we have adopted it as our rectal NET marker. Relatively frequent and strong expression in Merkel cell carcinoma may have value in assigning NEC site of origin.

Project description:IntroductionRecent classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms has defined well-differentiated high-grade neuroendocrine tumors (NET G3) as a distinct entity from poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma. The optimal treatment for NET G3 has not been well-described. This study aimed to evaluate metastatic NET G3 response to different treatment regimens.Materials and methodsThis was a retrospective study of patients with NET G3 within the Mayo Clinic database. Patients' demographics along with treatment characteristics, responses, and survival were assessed. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival. Secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR).ResultsTreatment data was available in 30 patients with median age of 59.5 years at diagnosis. The primary tumor was mostly pancreatic (73.3%). Ki-67 index was ≥55% in 26.7% of cases. Treatments included capecitabine + temozolomide (CAPTEM) (n = 20), lutetium 177 DOTATATE (PRRT; n = 10), Platinum-etoposide (EP; n = 8), FOLFOX (n = 7), and everolimus (n = 2). CAPTEM exhibited ORR 35%, DCR 65%, and median PFS 9.4 months (95% confidence interval, 2.96-16.07). Both EP and FOLFOX showed similar radiographic response rates with ORR 25.0% and 28.6%; however, median PFS durations were quite distinct at 2.94 and 13.04 months, respectively. PRRT had ORR of 20%, DCR of 70%, and median PFS of 9.13 months.ConclusionAmong patients with NET G3, CAPTEM was the most commonly used treatment with clinically meaningful efficacy and disease control. FOLFOX or PRRT are other potentially active treatment options. EP has some activity in NET G3, but responses appear to be short-lived. Prospective studies evaluating different treatments effects in patients with NET G3 are needed to determine an optimal treatment strategy.Implications for practiceHigh-grade well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NET G3) are considered a different entity from low-grade NET and neuroendocrine carcinoma in terms of prognosis and management. The oral combination of capecitabine and temozolomide is considered a good option in the management of metastatic NET G3 and may be preferred. FOLFOX is another systemic option with reasonable efficacy. Similar to other well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy seems to have some efficacy in these tumors.