Dataset Information

Patient perceptions of co-morbidities in inflammatory arthritis.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

Longer life expectancy has resulted in people living with an increasing number of co-morbidities. The average individual with inflammatory arthritis has two co-morbidities, which contribute to higher mortality, poorer functional outcomes and increased health-care utilization and cost. A number of studies have investigated the prevalence of co-morbidities, whereas this study was designed to look at patient perspectives.

Methods

The study comprised two parts: a patient questionnaire and an interview. Individuals with physician-verified inflammatory arthritis along with one or more Charlson co-morbidities were invited to participate. In-depth data were obtained by interviews with 12 willing participants.

Results

One hundred and forty-six individuals were recruited; 50 (35%) had one co-morbidity, 69 (48%) had two and 25 (17%) had more than four co-morbidities. Seventy-seven individuals (53%) reported that co-morbidities affected their health as much as their arthritis, and 82 (56%) reported dependence on others for activities of daily living. Lack of education was highlighted by 106 (73%) participants. Qualitative data provided further support for the challenges, with participants highlighting the lack of time to discuss complex or multiple problems, with no-one coordinating their care. This, in turn, led to polypharmacy and insufficient discussion around drug and disease interactions, complications and self-help measures.

Conclusion

This study highlights the challenges for individuals with inflammatory arthritis who suffer with multiple co-morbidities. The challenges result from limited resources or support within the current health-care environments. Individuals highlighted the poor quality of life, which is multifactorial, and the need for better educational strategies and coordination of care to improve outcomes.

SUBMITTER: Koduri GM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7884022 | biostudies-literature | 2021

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Patient perceptions of co-morbidities in inflammatory arthritis.

Koduri Gouri M GM Gullick Nicola J NJ Hayes Fiona F Dubey Shirish S Mukhtyar Chetan C

Rheumatology advances in practice 20210111 1

<h4>Objective</h4>Longer life expectancy has resulted in people living with an increasing number of co-morbidities. The average individual with inflammatory arthritis has two co-morbidities, which contribute to higher mortality, poorer functional outcomes and increased health-care utilization and cost. A number of studies have investigated the prevalence of co-morbidities, whereas this study was designed to look at patient perspectives.<h4>Methods</h4>The study comprised two parts: a patient que ...[more]

PMID: 33615128

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundIn drug development, it is important to have an understanding of the full spectrum of co-morbidities to be expected in the group of patients with the disease of interest. It is usually a challenge to identify the less common events associated with the target disease, even if these events are severe. The purpose of this study is to identify co-morbidities associated with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) as compared with a control group, using a large health care database.MethodsMarketscan US claims database was used for this retrospective cohort study. Selected were records of persons aged at least 16 Y with at least two claims for RA, and with active insurance status on June 30, 2007. The control group had at least two claims for eczema/dermatitis. Controls were matched by age, gender and insurance status (Medicare or not). All co-morbidities with an ICD9 diagnostic code were identified in the RA and control groups, during a one-year window. Relative risks (RRs) were calculated. Diagnoses were rank-ordered by magnitude of RR. Codes covering RA and arthropathy were excluded. In order to get stable estimates, rank-ordering was performed for diagnoses occurring in at least 20 persons in the control group.ResultsRecords were selected of 62,681 persons with RA (mean age was 59.0 Y, with 73.8% female, Medicare-covered 35%). A total of 6,897 different ICD9 diagnostic codes were recorded, with 2,220 codes in at least 20 persons of the control group [listed with Relative Risk]. Apart from joint/bone related conditions, strong associations with RA (RR > 3) were found for Adverse effect medicinal and biological substance not elsewhere classified, Unspecified adverse effect drug properly administered, Idiopathic fibrosing alveolitis, Osteomyelitis, Immune deficiency, Elevated sedimentation rate, Tuberculin test reaction abnormal or positive, Anemia and Cushing syndrome.ConclusionsData on a large number (> 60,000) of patients with a diagnosis of RA were used to analyze and to list a large number (> 2,000) of co-morbidities. Rank-ordering of RRs of diagnostic codes is a tool to identify quickly many conditions associated with RA.

Project description:BackgroundIndiscriminate use of laboratory blood testing in hospitals contributes to patient discomfort and healthcare waste. Patient engagement in low-value healthcare can help reduce overuse. Understanding patient experience is necessary to identify opportunities to improve patient engagement with in-hospital laboratory testing.ObjectivesTo understand patient experience with the process of in-hospital laboratory blood testing.MethodsWe used a qualitative study design via semistructured interviews conducted online or over the phone. Participants were adult patients or family members/caregivers (≥18 years of age) with a recent (within 12 months of interview) experience of hospitalization in Alberta or British Columbia, Canada. We identified participants through convenience sampling and conducted interviews between May 2021 and June 2022. We analysed transcripts using thematic content analysis. Recruitment was continued until code saturation was reached.ResultsWe interviewed 16 participants (13 patients, 1 family member and 2 caregivers). We identified four themes from patients' experiences of in-hospital laboratory blood testing: (i) patients need information from healthcare teams about expected blood testing processes, (ii) blood draw processes should consider patient comfort and preferences, (iii) patients want information from their healthcare teams about the rationale and frequency of blood testing and (iv) patients need information on how their testing results affect their medical care.ConclusionCurrent laboratory testing processes in hospitals do not facilitate shared decision-making and patient engagement. Patient engagement with laboratory testing in hospitals requires an empathetic healthcare team that provides clear communication regarding testing procedures, rationale and results, while considering patient preferences and offering opportunities for involvement.Patient or public contributionWe interviewed 16 patients and/or family members/caregivers regarding their in-hospital laboratory blood testing experiences. Our findings show correlations between patient needs and patient recommendations to make testing processes more patient-centred. To bring a lived-experience lens to this study, we formed a Patient Advisory Council with 9-11 patient research partners. Our patient research partners informed the research design, co-developed participant recruitment strategies, co-conducted data collection and informed the data analysis. Some of our patient research partners are co-authors of this manuscript.

Project description:IntroductionBenepali® was the first etanercept (Enbrel®) biosimilar to be approved in the European Union. Both Benepali and Enbrel are available as autoinjector devices. In a recent survey, nurses from France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom (UK) reported that their patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) would prefer the Benepali autoinjector compared to the Enbrel MYCLIC autoinjector. To determine whether patients' perceptions were similar to those of the nurses, this survey evaluated patients' perceptions and preferences of the Benepali autoinjector versus the Enbrel MYCLIC autoinjector in the same five European countries.MethodsPatients with RA using the Enbrel MYCLIC autoinjector participated in a 25-min, face-to-face questionnaire-interview. Patients were also shown an instructional video and device-handling leaflet, received a live demonstration on the Benepali autoinjector, and had access to both Benepali and Enbrel MYCLIC training autoinjectors. Patients rated the importance of ten autoinjector attributes on a seven-point scale (1 = not important at all; 7 = extremely important) and provided their autoinjector preferences based on specific attributes. Patients also gave their opinion on which autoinjector they would prefer to use for self-injection.ResultsOverall, 220 patients participated in the survey (France, n = 30; Germany, n = 65; Italy, n = 67; Spain, n = 12; UK, n = 46). 'Easy to operate the self-injection' was ranked as the most important attribute (mean score of 6.8), followed by 'easy to grip' (6.5), and 'intuitive/self-explaining usage' (6.3). Patients preferred the Benepali autoinjector, with the attribute of 'easier to operate' being a strong differentiator compared to the Enbrel MYCLIC autoinjector. Most patients (74%) reported that they would prefer to use the Benepali autoinjector over the Enbrel MYCLIC autoinjector. 'Easy to operate the self-injection' and 'button-free autoinjector' were key drivers when selecting an autoinjector.ConclusionsPatients in Europe reported a preference for the Benepali autoinjector compared to the Enbrel MYCLIC autoinjector. This finding is consistent with results from a recently reported nurse survey.FundingBiogen.

Dataset Information

Patient perceptions of co-morbidities in inflammatory arthritis.

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Patient perceptions of co-morbidities in inflammatory arthritis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets