Large Cystic Intracardiac Mass Overlying Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Device: A Case Report and Literature Review
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Joury A
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7887612 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Dec
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC7854490 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Highlights•The WaveCrest device is a novel LAA occluder with unique features.•Two-dimensional and 3D TEE and fluoroscopy are essential for successful implantation.•Air between layers of WaveCrest ePTFE fabric may obscure visualization on TEE.
| S-EPMC6302034 | biostudies-other
Project description:BackgroundTranscatheter left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) using Watchman device has been demonstrated to be efficacious in decreasing stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation who are not suitable for long-term anticoagulation. Residual leaks are frequently encountered following LAAO procedures and their clinical implications and optimal management remain controversial.Case summaryIn this report, we describe a case of peri-Watchman device leak treated successfully with percutaneous device closure using an Amplatzer Vascular Plug II device.DiscussionThe clinical implications of peri-device leaks remain controversial with general consensus to continue anticoagulation along with serial imaging for larger leaks (>5 mm). As an alternative strategy, percutaneous closure of these leaks has been attempted in hope of avoiding anticoagulation and minimizing the risk of stroke and should be studied further.
| S-EPMC7501943 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia worldwide and associated with an elevated risk of thromboembolic stroke and systemic embolization. The evidence suggests that ~90% of thrombi in patients with non-valvular AF are localized to the left atrial appendage (LAA). Therefore, it seems reasonable to consider LAA exclusion in selected patients with AF for stroke prevention. LAA exclusion can be achieved through a variety of surgical and percutaneous techniques. Surgical methods include LAA amputation, ligation, clipping and stapling. Whereas percutaneous strategies consist of endocardial closure using an LAA occlusion device and epicardial LAA ligation using a snare device. Even though several trials and registries of LAA exclusion have yielded promising outcomes, at this time evidence for long term safety and efficacy seems insufficient to recommend this approach to all patients with non-valvular AF. Future prospective randomized trials are needed to assess the precise role for these therapeutic options. Furthermore, there is a paucity of data on the comparison of these strategies to the novel oral anticoagulants which also deserves further attention. This review will carefully examine the current LAA exclusion techniques and the available data.
| S-EPMC5153132 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundLeft atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) to prevent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation has been evaluated in 2 randomized trials; post-approval clinical data are limited.ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to describe the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) LAAO Registry and present patient, hospital, and physician characteristics and in-hospital adverse event rates for Watchman procedures in the United States during its first 3 years.MethodsThe authors describe the LAAO Registry structure and governance, the outcome adjudication processes, and the data quality and collection processes. They characterize the patient population, performing hospitals, and in-hospital adverse event rates.ResultsA total of 38,158 procedures from 495 hospitals performed by 1,318 physicians in the United States were included between January 2016 and December 2018. The mean patient age was 76.1 ± 8.1 years, the mean CHA2DS2-VASc (congestive heart failure, hypertension, 65 years of age and older, diabetes mellitus, previous stroke or transient ischemic attack, vascular disease, 65 to 74 years of age, female) score was 4.6 ± 1.5, and the mean HAS-BLED (hypertension, abnormal renal/liver function, stroke, bleeding history or predisposition, labile international normalized ratio, elderly, drugs/alcohol concomitantly) score was 3.0 ± 1.1. The median annual number of LAAO procedures performed for hospitals was 30 (interquartile range: 18 to 44) and for physicians was 12 (interquartile range: 8 to 20). Procedures were canceled or aborted in 7% of cases; among cases in which a device was deployed, 98.1% were implanted with <5-mm leak. Major in-hospital adverse events occurred in 2.16% of patients; the most common complications were pericardial effusion requiring intervention (1.39%) and major bleeding (1.25%), whereas stroke (0.17%) and death (0.19%) were rare.ConclusionsThe LAAO Registry has enrolled >38,000 patients implanted with the device. Patients were generally older with more comorbidities than those enrolled in the pivotal trials; however, major in-hospital adverse event rates were lower than reported in those trials.
| S-EPMC7205034 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND:Imaging guidance for left atrial appendage (LAA) closure (LAAC) conventionally consists of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and fluoroscopy under general anesthesia (GA). Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) can eliminate the need for GA, expedite procedural logistics, and reduce the patient experience to a simple venous puncture. OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this study was to define optimal ICE views and compare procedural parameters and cost of ICE vs TEE during LAAC with the Watchman device. METHODS:Optimal ICE views of the LAA for Watchman implant were delineated using Carto-Sound and 3-dimensional rendition of the LAA in 6 patients. Procedural and financial parameters of 104 consecutive patients with standard indications for LAAC undergoing Watchman implant using ICE guidance through a single transseptal puncture (n = 53 [51%]) were compared with those of TEE-guided implants (n = 51 [49%]) in 3 centers. RESULTS:Clinical characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. Total in-room, turnaround, and fluoroscopy times all were shorter using ICE (P <.05) under local anesthesia compared to the TEE group. Implant success was 100% in both groups without peri-device leaks or procedural complications. Follow-up TEE showed no significant peri-device leak in both groups. Total hospital charges for ICE with local anesthesia vs TEE were similar, as were total hospital direct and indirect costs. Professional fees were significantly lower with ICE and local anesthesia than with TEE because the charge of anesthesia staff was avoided. CONCLUSION:ICE-guided Watchman implant is safe, feasible, and comparable in cost to TEE during LAAC with a Watchman device but avoids GA and expedites procedure turnaround.
| S-EPMC6400300 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundIn patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, an estimated 90% of thrombi are located in the left atrial appendage. The WATCHMAN device is a left atrial appendage closure device that is an alternative therapeutic option to reduce the risk of systemic embolization in patients who are intolerant of long-term oral anticoagulation. It can be deployed in the left atrial appendage using a transseptal approach via the femoral vein. Transhepatic venous access is an alternative route for the delivery of the device in a patient with difficult vascular access.Case summaryAn 81-year-old man with persistent non-valvular atrial fibrillation, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), and diabetes mellitus was deemed a poor candidate for anticoagulation due to recurrent falls and gastrointestinal bleeding. He was selected for a left atrial appendage closure. The initial procedure was aborted after significant resistance to device advancement was encountered in the right femoral vein. Lower extremity venography demonstrated totally occluded femoral and iliac veins bilaterally. The decision was made to implant the device via a transhepatic approach. The procedure had no complications and the patient was discharged on rivaroxaban and aspirin after 3 days.DiscussionTranshepatic venous access is a viable option in patients with poor femoral access for implantation of the WATCHMAN device. It can be done safely. Knowledge of this procedural alternative can greatly enhance patient care.
| S-EPMC7891241 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundPericardial effusion is a common complication of percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure. Acute management is the cornerstone of pericardial effusion treatment and interrupting the intervention is often required.Case summaryA 65-year-old man presented an acute 10 mm pericardial effusion following pigtail contrast appendage injection. A rapid Watchman Flex 24 mm (Boston Scientific) deployment permitted bleeding interruption. A needle pericardiocentesis was achieved in order to prevent any haemodynamical instability.DiscussionThis case report describes an atypical cause of pericardial effusion and a technique for bleeding control with LAA closure device deployment.
| S-EPMC8183657 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Left atrial appendage aneurysms (LAAA) are rare. Patients with LAAA are often diagnosed incidentally or after cardiac tachyarrhythmia or systemic thromboembolism happen. Early diagnosis and surgical resection is of utmost importance to prevent hazardous adverse events.We present a case of 46-year-old man with congenital LAAA. The individual in this manuscript has given written informed consent to publish these case details.Imaging studies, such as echocardiography, cardiovascular computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), demonstrated the large cavity arising from the left atrial appendage. The diagnosis of LAAA was confirmed.The patient underwent an aneurysmectomy without any complications.TTE confirmed the disappearance of the LAAA from the left parasternal short-axis view of the aortic root postoperatively. The patient remained asymptomatic without any adverse events at his 3-month follow-up visits.The associated high risk of life-threatening complications and the relative ease of surgical removal suggest that prompt evaluation should be considered in patients with lesions adjacent to the left heart border.
| S-EPMC5943883 | biostudies-other
Project description:BACKGROUND:There is increasing interest in performing left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion at the time of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedures. However, to date there has been no description of the acute changes to the LAA immediately following pulmonary vein (PV) isolation and additional left atrium (LA) substrate modification. This study assessed changes in the size and tissue characteristics of the LAA ostium in patients undergoing PV isolation. METHODS:This series included 8 patients who underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance evaluation of the LA with delayed enhancement magnetic resonance imaging and contrast enhanced 3-D magnetic resonance angiography pre-, within 48 h of, and 3 months post ablation. Two independent cardiac radiologists evaluated the ostial LAA diameters and area at each time point in addition to the presence of gadolinium enhancement. RESULTS:Compared to pre-ablation values, the respective median differences in oblique diameters and LAA area were +1.8 mm, +1.7 mm, and +0.6 cm(2) immediately post ablation (all NS) and -2.7 mm, -2.3 mm, and -0.5 cm(2) at 3 months (all NS). No delayed enhancement was detected in the LAA post ablation. CONCLUSION:No significant change to LAA diameter, area, or tissue characteristics was noted after PV isolation. While these findings suggest the safety and feasibility of concomitant PV isolation and LAA device occlusion, the variability in the degree and direction of change of the LAA measurements highlights the need for further study.
| S-EPMC4550107 | biostudies-literature