Dataset Information

Rheumatic immune-related adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors compared with placebo in oncologic patients: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

We aim to characterize the incidence and relative risk of rheumatic and systemic immune-related adverse effects (irAEs) among immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy compared with those after placebo treatment.

Methods

Randomized clinical trial studies with placebo control with the following keywords were searched from Embase, PubMed, Cochrane databases: immune checkpoint inhibitors, neoplasms, randomized controlled trials, and adverse effects.

Results

Among the 5444 published and 316 registration records, nine placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials met our selection criteria, and included data from 5560 patients. Compared with placebo use, using ICIs increases the risk of overall-rheumatic irAEs. The incidence and relative risk of all-grade rheumatic irAEs were 18.40% [95% confidence interval (CI) 12.16-25.59%, p?n?=?11), autoimmune arthritis (n?=?8), autoimmune uveitis (n?=?3), autoimmune pericarditis, bursitis, osteochondrosis, psoriasis, polymyalgia rheumatica, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, and Sjögren syndrome (n?=?1, each).

Conclusion

ICI therapy increased the incidence and relative risk of all-grade and severe rheumatic irAEs. Arthralgia was the most commonly observed non-severe irAE, while colitis and pneumonitis were commonly observed severe irAEs. Rare rheumatic irAEs like hepatitis, hypophysitis, thyroiditis, and myositis warrant special attention.

SUBMITTER: Zhang S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7887685 | biostudies-literature | 2021

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Rheumatic immune-related adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors compared with placebo in oncologic patients: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

Zhang Shuo S Zhou Ziyue Z Wang Li L Li Mengtao M Zhang Fengchun F Zeng Xiaofeng X

Therapeutic advances in chronic disease 20210212

<h4>Objective</h4>We aim to characterize the incidence and relative risk of rheumatic and systemic immune-related adverse effects (irAEs) among immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy compared with those after placebo treatment.<h4>Methods</h4>Randomized clinical trial studies with placebo control with the following keywords were searched from Embase, PubMed, Cochrane databases: immune checkpoint inhibitors, neoplasms, randomized controlled trials, and adverse effects.<h4>Results</h4>Among the ...[more]

PMID: 33633822

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has emerged as a popular cancer treatment approach. However, non-specific activation of T cells by ICIs can lead to immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including specific rheumatic manifestations. The study aimed to explore the current trend of ICIs associated rheumatic irAEs and summarize the knowledge structure through bibliometric methods.MethodsThe Web of Science Core Collection database (WoSCC) was selected for retrieving literature on ICIs associated rheumatic irAEs. To evaluate contributions from different countries/regions, institutions, journals, and authors, bibliometric analysis software, including VOSviewer and CiteSpace, as well as bibliometric online platforms, were utilized to construct and visualize bibliometric networks. Through the systematic review of this knowledge domain, future research directions were determined.ResultsIn This study, a total of 803 publications on ICIs-associated rheumatic irAEs were included for analysis. The distribution of these publications revealed two distinct growth phases: a stable phase between 2007 to 2015 followed by rapid growth from 2016 to 2020. The United States emerged as the top contributor in terms of publications, citations, and h-index, with the majority of leading institutions and funding agencies located there. Apart from government funding, pharmaceutical companies such as Bristol Myers Squibb and Merck Company also play a significant role in drug development and research. Analysis of keywords and citation bursts indicated that the initial burst was related to "monoclonal antibody," "anti-CLTA4 antibody," and "melanoma". This was followed by a rise in interest related to "sarcoidosis," "safety," "inflammatory arthritis," and "preexisting autoimmune."ConclusionThis study summarized the global research trends concerning ICIs associated rheumatic irAEs. The findings can provide valuable insights into the current understanding of rheumatic irAEs, highlight the research trend and developments in the field. Future efforts should focus on developing classification criteria and guidelines, conducting prospective studies, investigating the mechanisms involved, and identifying biomarkers for prediction and monitoring of these events.

Project description:Unlabelled: In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors have emerged as effective therapies for advanced neoplasias. As new checkpoint target blockers become available and additional tumor locations tested, their use is expected to increase within a short time. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) affecting the endocrine system are among the most frequent and complex toxicities. Some may be life-threatening if not recognized; hence, appropriate guidance for oncologists is needed. Despite their high incidence, endocrine irAEs have not been fully described for all immunotherapy agents available. This article is a narrative review of endocrinopathies associated with cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4, blockade of programmed death receptor 1 and its ligand inhibitors, and their combination. Thyroid dysfunction is the most frequent irAE reported, and hypophysitis is characteristic of ipilimumab. Incidence, timing patterns, and clinical presentation are discussed, and practical recommendations for clinical management are suggested. Heterogeneous terminology and lack of appropriate resolution criteria in clinical trials make adequate evaluation of endocrine AEs difficult. It is necessary to standardize definitions to contrast incidences and characterize toxicity patterns. To provide optimal care, a multidisciplinary team that includes endocrinology specialists is recommended.Implications for practiceImmune checkpoint inhibitors are already part of oncologists' therapeutic arsenal as effective therapies for otherwise untreatable neoplasias, such as metastatic melanoma or lung cancer. Their use is expected to increase exponentially in the near future as additional agents become available and their approval is extended to different tumor types. Adverse events affecting the endocrine system are among the most frequent and complex toxicities oncologists may face, and some may be life-threatening if not recognized. This study reviews endocrinopathies associated to immune checkpoint inhibitors available to date. Incidence, timing patterns, and clinical presentation are discussed, and practical recommendations for management are proposed.

Project description:Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the treatment landscape for patients with many advanced malignancies, only 15-60% of patients respond, leaving a broad swath of patients who do not derive benefit. Identifying biomarkers to optimally identify patients who will benefit from ICIs is a major research focus for the oncology community. Thus far, predictive biomarker research has focused on tumor signatures such as microsatellite instability, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and tumor mutational burden; clinical biomarkers have been far less studied. One potential clinical biomarker for ICI response in patients is immune-related adverse event (IRAE) onset.IRAEs are thought to represent bystander effects from activated T-cells and it is plausible that patients responding to ICIs would have greater likelihood of autoimmune toxicities (e.g. due to a more competent/treatment-responsive immune system, or cross-reactivity between tumor and host tissue). Earlier studies in melanoma patients however, suggested no association between IRAE onset and anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) antibody efficacy. In contrast, a growing body of literature suggests IRAE onset is predictive of anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and anti-PD-L1 antibody response across a variety of solid tumors. Most of these studies report that patients who experienced IRAEs demonstrate marked improvements in progression-free survival, overall survival and overall response rate compared to those lacking toxicity.Key questions regarding the association between IRAE onset and ICI efficacy remain. The most pertinent of these involve whether the association is only relevant for patients treated with anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibodies and whether IRAE site, severity, timing of onset and management influence ICI efficacy. Herein, we discuss the seminal studies which have begun to address these questions and have shaped the narrative about the predictive value of IRAE onset for patients on ICIs, in this review.

Project description:IntroductionImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become an important part of the treatment of multiple cancers, especially for advanced melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer. Some tumors are capable of escaping immunosurveillance by stimulating checkpoints on T-cells. ICIs prevent activation of these checkpoints and thereby stimulate the immune system and indirectly the anti-tumor response. However, the use of ICIs is associated with various adverse events. Ocular side effects are rare but may have a major impact on the quality of life of the patient.MethodsA comprehensive literature search of the medical databases Web of Science, Embase and PubMed was performed. Articles that provided a comprehensive description of a case report containing 1) cancer patient(s) treated with (a combination of) immune checkpoint inhibitors, and 2) assessed occurrence of ocular adverse events, were included. A total of 290 case reports were included.ResultsMelanoma (n = 179; 61.7%) and lung cancer (n = 56; 19.3%) were the most frequent reported malignancies. The primary used ICIs were nivolumab (n = 123; 42.5%) and ipilimumab (n = 116; 40.0%). Uveitis was most the common adverse event (n = 134; 46.2%) and mainly related to melanoma. Neuro-ophthalmic disorders, including myasthenia gravis and cranial nerve disorders, were the second most common adverse events (n = 71; 24.5%), mainly related to lung cancer. Adverse events affecting the orbit and the cornea were reported in 33 (11.4%) and 30 cases (10.3%) respectively. Adverse events concerning the retina were reported in 26 cases (9.0%).ConclusionThe aim of this paper is to provide an overview of all reported ocular adverse events related to the use of ICIs. The insights retrieved from this review might contribute to a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms of these ocular adverse events. Particularly, the difference between actual immune-related adverse events and paraneoplastic syndromes might be relevant. These findings might be of great value in establishing guidelines on how to manage ocular adverse events related to ICIs.

Dataset Information

Rheumatic immune-related adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors compared with placebo in oncologic patients: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Rheumatic immune-related adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors compared with placebo in oncologic patients: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets