Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Study question
Could the anogenital distance (AGD) as assessed by MRI (MRI-AGD) be a diagnostic tool for endometriosis?Summary answer
A short MRI-AGD is a strong diagnostic marker of endometriosis.What is known already
A short clinically assessed AGD (C-AGD) is associated with the presence of endometriosis.Study design size duration
This study is a re-analysis of previously published data from a case-control study.Participants/materials setting methods
Women undergoing pelvic surgery from January 2018 to June 2019 and who had a preoperative pelvic MRI were included. C-AGD was measured at the beginning of the surgery by a different operator who was unaware of the endometriosis status. MRI-AGD was measured retrospectively by a senior radiologist who was blinded to the final diagnosis. Two measurements were made: from the posterior wall of the clitoris to the anterior edge of the anal canal (MRI-AGD-AC), and from the posterior wall of the vagina to the anterior edge of the anal canal (MRI-AGD-AF).Main results and the role of chance
The study compared MRI-AGD of 67 women with endometriosis to 31 without endometriosis (controls). Average MRI-AGD-AF measurements were 13.3?mm (±3.9) and 21.2?mm (±5.4) in the endometriosis and non-endometriosis groups, respectively (P?-5). Average MRI-AGD-AC measurements were 40.4?mm (±7.3) and 51.1?mm (±8.6) for the endometriosis and non-endometriosis groups, respectively (P?-5). There was no difference of MRI-AGD in women with and without endometrioma (P?=?0.21), or digestive involvement (P?=?0.26). Moreover, MRI-AGD values were independent of the revised score of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine and the Enzian score. The diagnosis of endometriosis was negatively associated with both the MRI-AGD-AF (? = -7.79, 95% CI (-9.88; -5.71), P?? = -9.51?mm, 95% CI (-12.7; 6.24), P?? = +0.31?mm, 95% CI (0.09; 0.53), P?=?0.006) and BMI (? = +0.44?mm, 95% CI (0.17; 0.72), P?=?0.001) were positively associated with the MRI-AGD-AC measurements in multivariable analysis. MRI-AGD-AF had an AUC of 0.869 (95% CI (0.79; 0.95)) and outperformed C-AGD. Using an optimal cut-off of 20?mm for MRI-AGD-AF, a sensitivity of 97.01% and a specificity of 70.97% were noted.Limitations reasons for caution
This was a retrospective analysis and no adolescents had been included.Wider implications of the findings
This study is consistent with previous works associating a short C-AGD with endometriosis and the absence of correlation with the disease phenotype. MRI-AGD is more accurate than C-AGD in this setting and could be evaluated in the MRI examination of patients with suspected endometriosis.Study funding/competing interests
N/A.Trial registration number
The protocol was approved by the 'Groupe Nantais d'Ethique dans le Domaine de la Santé' and registered under reference 02651077.
SUBMITTER: Crestani A
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7887775 | biostudies-literature | 2021
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Human reproduction open 20210217 1
<h4>Study question</h4>Could the anogenital distance (AGD) as assessed by MRI (MRI-AGD) be a diagnostic tool for endometriosis?<h4>Summary answer</h4>A short MRI-AGD is a strong diagnostic marker of endometriosis.<h4>What is known already</h4>A short clinically assessed AGD (C-AGD) is associated with the presence of endometriosis.<h4>Study design size duration</h4>This study is a re-analysis of previously published data from a case-control study.<h4>Participants/materials setting methods</h4>Wom ...[more]