Dataset Information

Alternate Light Source Findings of Common Topical Cosmetics and Three Removal Methods.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Alternate light sources (ALSs) are a tool used by forensic nurses to aid in the physical examination of patients. Prior research has shown some topical makeup products absorb alternate light similar to the absorption noted in bruises. Therefore, the purposes of this study were (a) to further examine the ALS findings of multiple brands and types of makeup products and (b) to compare the efficacy of three methods of makeup removal.

Methods

Fourteen makeup products were applied to the forearms of 100 healthy adult volunteers with varying skin tones and then assessed under white light, six alternate light wavelengths, and three color filters, producing 19 total wavelength-and-filter combinations. The results were recorded before and after removal procedures by forensic nurse examiners who were blinded to the removal method. A three-arm randomized controlled trial of makeup removal methods (soap and water, isopropyl alcohol swab, makeup removal wipe) was conducted with the participants.

Results

All 14 makeup products produced absorption in at least 10% of the observations. Fluorescence was observed in more than 10% of the observations for only two products. After product removal, four products continued to produce statistically significant absorption findings when viewed under an ALS. One product produced significant fluorescence after removal procedures. There were no statistically significant differences between the removal methods noted in any of these analyses.

Conclusion

Our findings support the importance of using alternate light as one component of a comprehensive forensic examination, including history taking and physical examination.

SUBMITTER: Anderson JC

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7889613 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Immunoglobulin light chains are classified as middle molecule uremic toxins able to interact with B lymphocyte membranes leading to the activation of transmembrane signaling. The ensuing impairment of neutrophil function can contribute to the chronic inflammation state of uremic patients, and the increased risk of bacterial infections or vascular calcifications. The aim of this crossover observational study was to assess the difference in free light chain removal by three different hemodialysis filters in patients not affected by multiple myeloma.Free light chain removal was compared in the polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) membrane Filtryzer BK-F, the polyphenylene HFR17 filter and the conventional polysulfone filter F7HPS. Twenty chronic hemodialysis patients were enrolled: mean age was 67.7?±?17.0 years, M/F?=?14/6, dialysis vintage (months) 25.5?±?32.0. The patients were randomized into two groups of treatment lasting 6 weeks each. The dialysis sessions checked were the midweek sessions and the blood was drawn at times 0, 120' and 240'. Kappa (k) and lambda (?) light chain levels, ?2microglobulin (?2M), C reactive protein (CRP) and albumin were checked.K light chain levels were 345.0?±?100.0 mg/L, ? light chains were 121.4?±?27.0 mg/L. The values of k light chains at times 120' and 240' were significantly lower with PMMA and HFR17 than those obtained with F7. The reduction ratio per session (RRs) for k light chains was 44.1?±?4.3% with HFR17, 55.3?±?3.4% with PMMA, 25.7?±?8.3% with F7 (p?=?0.018). The RRs for ? light chains was 30.3?±?2.9% with HFR17, 37.8?±?17.3% with PMMA, 14.0?±?3.9% with F7 (p?=?0.032). As to ?2M, RRs was 42.4?±?3.2% with HFR17 vs. 33.9?±?2.8% with PMMA vs. 6.3?±?1.9% with F7 (p?=?0.022). The three filters tested showed no differences in CRP or albumin levels.In terms of light chain and ?2M removal, the PMMA and on-line HFR filters are similar and both are significantly more effective than the F7 filter in chronic dialysis patients.The present trial was registered retrospectively ( NCT02950389 , 31/10/2016).