Multi-annual performance evaluation of laboratories in post-mortem diagnosis of animal rabies: Which techniques lead to the most reliable results in practice?

ABSTRACT: Rabies diagnosis proficiency tests on animal specimens using four techniques (FAT, RTCIT, conventional RT-PCR and real-time RT-PCR) were organised over 10 years (2009-2019). Seventy-three laboratories, of which 59% were from Europe, took part. As the panels were prepared with experimentally-infected samples, the error rate of laboratories on positive and negative samples was accurately estimated. Based on fitted values produced by mixed modelling including the variable "laboratory" as a random variable to take into account the longitudinal design of our dataset, the technique that provided the most concordant results was conventional RT-PCR (99.3%; 95% CI 99.0-99.6), closely followed by FAT (99.1%; 95% CI 98.7-99.4), real-time RT-PCR (98.7%; 95% CI 98.1-99.3) and then RTCIT (96.8%; 95% CI

SUBMITTER: Robardet E 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7891719 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature