Survival Analysis of Radiation Therapy in Ovarian Cancer: A SEER Database Analysis.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Results
A total of 20031 ovarian cancer patients were included, with 291 (1.45%) patients who received radiotherapy. The median overall survival (OS) in patients who received radiotherapy was shorter than which in patients without radiotherapy (23 vs. 75 months, P < 0.001). The Elderly, nonepithelial pathology, advanced American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, elevated level of CA125, and receiving radiotherapy were risk predictors to survival in both multivariable analyses before and after PSM. Among 11872 patients with III/IV stage, the radiotherapy group also showed a significantly worse prognosis (median OS: 19 vs. 44 months in patients without radiotherapy, P < 0.001). Consistent results were observed in stratification analyses on pathology and stage among patients with III/IV stage.Conclusions
For patients with ovarian cancer, radiotherapy was associated with a poor prognosis regardless of pathology or stage. Considering this is a retrospective study, future studies concerning radiotherapy combination with other new agents in ovarian cancer are needed.
SUBMITTER: Yu L
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7892241 | biostudies-literature | 2021
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Survival Analysis of Radiation Therapy in Ovarian Cancer: A SEER Database Analysis.
Yu Lushi L Gong Hongyun H Li Qian Q Ren Honggang H Wang Yi Y He Haihua H Li Tian T Song Qibin Q
Journal of oncology 20210211
<h4>Results</h4>A total of 20031 ovarian cancer patients were included, with 291 (1.45%) patients who received radiotherapy. The median overall survival (OS) in patients who received radiotherapy was shorter than which in patients without radiotherapy (23 vs. 75 months, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The Elderly, nonepithelial pathology, advanced American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, elevated level of CA125, and receiving radiotherapy were risk predictors to survival in both multivariable analyse ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:We investigated the association between external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and pleural and peritoneal mesothelioma among long-term (>5 years) solid cancer survivors. We analyzed data from the US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program (1973-2012). We fitted survival models adjusted by age, gender, race, year, surgery, and relative risk of primary mesothelioma in the county of residence (proxy for individual asbestos exposure). We estimated hazard ratios [HR] with reference to nonirradiated patients. We distinguished between scattered and direct irradiation to study the dose-response. We observed 301 mesotheliomas (265 pleural; 32 peritoneal; 4 others) among 935,637 patients. EBRT increased the risk of mesothelioma (any site; HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.04-1.77). We observed an increased risk of pleural mesothelioma (HR for EBRT 1.34, 95% CI 1.01-1.77), but we did not find signs of a dose-response relationship (HR for scattered irradiation 1.38; HR for direct irradiation 1.23). On the opposite, only direct peritoneal irradiation was associated with peritoneal mesothelioma (HR 2.20, 95% CI 0.99-4.88), particularly for latencies ?10 years (HR 3.28, 95% CI 1.14-9.43). A competing risks analysis revealed that the clinical impact of radiation-induced mesothelioma was limited by the high frequency of competing events. The cumulative incidence function of mesothelioma after 40 years of observation was very low (nonirradiated patients 0.00032, irradiated patients 0.00055).EBRT might be a determinant of mesothelioma. Longer latency periods are associated with higher risks, while the dose-response seems nonlinear. The clinical impact of mesothelioma after EBRT for primary solid cancers is limited.
| S-EPMC4864824 | biostudies-other
Project description:BackgroundDue to negative results in clinical trials of postoperative chemoradiation for gastric cancer, at present, there is a tendency to move chemoradiation therapy forward in gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma. Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are currently recruiting subjects to investigate the effect of neo-adjuvant radiotherapy (NRT) in gastric and GEJ cancer. Large retrospective studies may be beneficial in clarifying the potential benefit of NRT, providing implications for RCTs.MethodsWe retrieved the clinicopathological and treatment data of gastric and GEJ adenocarcinoma patients who underwent surgical resection and chemotherapy between 2004 and 2015 from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. We compared survival between NRT and non-NRT patients among four clinical subgroups (T1-2N-, T1-2N+, T3-4N-, and T3-4N+).ResultsOverall, 5272 patients were identified, among which 1984 patients received NRT. After adjusting confounding variables, significantly improved survival between patients with and without NRT was only observed in T3-4N+ subgroup [hazard ratio (HR) 0.79, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.66-0.95; P = 0.01]. Besides, Kaplan-Meier plots showed significant cause-specific survival advantage of NRT in intestinal type (P < 0.001), but not in diffuse type (P = 0.11) for T3-4N+ patients. In the multivariate competing risk model, NRT still showed survival advantage only in T3-4 N+ patients (subdistribution HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.64-0.93; P = 0.006), but not in other subgroups.ConclusionsNRT might benefit resectable gastric and GEJ cancer patients of T3-4 stages with positive lymph nodes, particularly for intestinal-type. Nevertheless, these results should be interpreted with caution, and more data from ongoing RCTs are warranted.
| S-EPMC8254219 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeThe aim of study was to screen factors associated with the overall survival of colorectal cancer patients with lymph nodes metastasis who received neoadjuvant therapy and construct a nomogram model.MethodsAll enrolled subjects of the SEER database were randomly assigned to the training and testing group in a ratio of 3:2. The patients of Tangdu Hospital were seemed as validation group. Univariate cox regression analysis, lasso regression and random forest survival were used to screen variables related to the survival of advanced CRC patients received neoadjuvant therapy in the training group. Area under curves were adopted to evaluate the 1,3,5-year prediction value of the optimal model in three cohorts. Calibration curves were drawn to observe the prediction accuracy of the nomogram model. Decision curve analysis was used to assess the potential clinical value of the nomogram model.ResultsA total of 1833 subjects were enrolled in this study. After random allocation, 1055 cases of the SEER database served as the training group, 704 cases as the testing group and 74 patients from our center as the external validation group. Variables were screened by univariate cox regression used to construct a nomogram survival prediction model, including M, age, chemotherapy, CEA, perineural invasion, tumor size, LODDS, liver metastasis and radiation. The AUCs of the model for predicting 1-year OS in the training group, testing and validation group were 0.765 (0.703,0.827), 0.772 (0.697,0.847) and 0.742 (0.601,0.883), predicting 3-year OS were 0.761 (0.725,0.780), 0.742 (0.699,0.785), 0.733 (0.560,0.905) and 5-year OS were 0.742 (0.711,0.773), 0.746 (0.709,0.783), 0.838 (0.670,0.980), respectively. The calibration curves showed the difference between prediction probability of the model and the actual survival was not significant in three cohorts and the decision curve analysis revealed the practice clinical application value. And the prediction value of model was better for young CRC than older CRC patients.ConclusionA nomogram model including LODDS for the prognosis of advanced CRC received neoadjuvant therapy was constructed and verified based on the SEER database and single center practice. The accuracy and potential clinical application value of the model performed well, and the model had better predictive value for EOCRC than LOCRC.
| S-EPMC11218294 | biostudies-literature
Project description:We assessed survival after radical prostatectomy, intensity modulated radiation therapy or conformal radiation therapy vs no local therapy for metastatic prostate cancer adjusting for patient comorbidity, androgen deprivation therapy and other factors.We identified men 66 years old or older with metastatic prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy, intensity modulated radiation therapy, conformal radiation therapy or no local therapy in the SEER-Medicare linked database from 2004 to 2009. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models before and after inverse propensity score weighting were used to assess all cause and prostate cancer specific mortality. Competing risk regression analysis was done to assess prostate cancer specific mortality.Of 4,069 men with metastatic prostate cancer radical prostatectomy in 47, intensity modulated radiation therapy in 88 and conformal radiation therapy in 107 were selected as local therapy vs no local therapy in 3,827. Radical prostatectomy was associated with a 52% decrease (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.27-0.85) in the risk of prostate cancer specific mortality after adjusting for sociodemographics, primary tumor characteristics, comorbidity, androgen deprivation therapy and bone radiation within 6 months of diagnosis. Intensity modulated radiation therapy was associated with a 62% decrease (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.24-0.61) in the risk of prostate specific cancer specific mortality. Conformal radiation therapy was not associated with improved survival compared to no local therapy. Propensity score weighting yielded comparable results. Competing risk analysis revealed a 42% and 57% decrease (SHR 0.58, 95% CI 0.35-0.95 and SHR 0.43, 95% CI 0.27-0.68, respectively) in the risk of prostate cancer specific mortality for radical prostatectomy and intensity modulated radiation therapy.Local therapy with radical prostatectomy and intensity modulated radiation therapy but not with conformal radiation therapy was associated with a survival benefit in men with metastatic prostate cancer. This finding warrants prospective evaluation in clinical trials.
| S-EPMC4834920 | biostudies-literature
Project description:In the United States, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) survival varies with tumor characteristics, patient comorbidities, and treatment. The effect of HCC etiology on survival is less clearly defined. The relationship between HCC etiology and mortality was examined using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare data. In a cohort of 11,522 HCC cases diagnosed from 2000 through 2014, etiologies were identified from Medicare data, including metabolic disorders (32.9%), hepatitis C virus (8.2%), alcohol (4.7%), hepatitis B virus (HBV, 2.1%), rare etiologies (0.9%), multiple etiologies (26.7%), and unknown etiology (24.4%). After adjusting for demographics, tumor characteristics, comorbidities and treatment, hazard ratios (HRs) and survival curves by HCC etiology were estimated using Cox proportional hazard models. Compared with HBV-related HCC cases, higher mortality was observed for those with alcohol-related HCC (HR 1.49; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.25-1.77), metabolic disorder-related HCC (HR 1.25; 95% CI 1.07-1.47), and multiple etiology-related HCC (HR 1.25; 95% CI 1.07-1.46), but was not statistically significant for hepatitis C virus-related, rare disorder-related, and HCC of unknown etiology. For all HCC etiologies, there was short median survival ranging from 6.1 months for alcohol to 10.3 months for HBV. Conclusion: More favorable survival was seen with HBV-related HCC. To the extent that HCC screening is more common among persons with HBV infection compared to those with other etiologic risk factors, population-based HCC screening, applied evenly to persons across all HCC etiology categories, could shift HCC diagnosis to earlier stages, when cases with good clinical status are more amenable to curative therapy.
| S-EPMC7527688 | biostudies-literature
Project description:No direct comparisons between extreme hypofractionation and conventional fractionation have been reported in randomized trials for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. The goal of this study is to use a propensity score matched (PSM) analysis with the National Cancer Database (NCDB) for the comparison of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for organ confined prostate cancer.Men with localized prostate cancer treated with radiation dose ?72?Gy for IMRT and ?35?Gy for SBRT to the prostate only were abstracted from the NCDB. Men treated with previous surgery, brachytherapy, or proton therapy were excluded. Matching was performed to eliminate confounding variables via PSM. Simple 1-1 nearest neighbor matching resulted in a matched sample of 5,430 (2,715 in each group). Subset analyses of men with prostate-specific antigen (PSA)?>?10, GS?=?7, and GS?>?7 yielded matched samples of 1,020, 2,194, and 247, respectively.No difference in survival was noted between IMRT and SBRT at 8?years (p?=?0.65). Subset analyses of higher risk men with PSA?>?10 or GS?=?7 histology or GS?>?7 histology revealed no difference in survival between IMRT and SBRT (p?=?0.58, p?=?0.68, and p?=?0.62, respectively). Variables significant for survival for the matched group included: age (p?<?0.0001), primary payor (p?=?0.0001), Charlson/Deyo Score (p?=?0.0002), PSA (p?=?0.0013), Gleason score (p?<?0.0001), and use of hormone therapy (p?=?0.02).Utilizing the NCDB, there is no difference in survival at 8?years comparing IMRT to SBRT in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. Subset analysis confirmed no difference in survival even for intermediate- and high-risk patients based on Gleason Score and PSA.
| S-EPMC5583523 | biostudies-other
Project description:IntroductionThe crosstalk between receptor kinase signaling, such as EGFR and androgen receptor signaling, suggests a potential interaction between androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and lung cancer outcome.MethodsWe employed the SEER-Medicare data of lung cancer patients diagnosed between 1988 and 2005 to test for an association between ADT for prostate cancer and lung cancer outcome. We employed the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard with log-rank test model to assess any significant impact of ADT on survival.ResultsWe included data from 367,750 lung cancer patients; 17.4%, 2.9%, 33.6% and 46.1% with stages I, II, III and IV, respectively; 84.5% were >65 years; 57.2% males; 84.2% Caucasians and 9.3% Blacks. There were 11,061 patients (3%) with an initial prostate cancer diagnosis followed by lung cancer (P-L group); 3017 (0.8%) with an initial diagnosis of lung cancer and subsequent prostate cancer diagnosis (L-P group); the remainder had only lung cancer (L group). Stage I lung cancer was most common in the L-P group compared to the L and P-L groups-54% vs. 17.13% vs. 17.92%, p < 0.0001 for L-P, L and P-L, respectively. The median OS for lung cancer diagnosis was 93 months versus 10 and 9 months, respectively, for the L-P, L and P-L subgroups. ADT was associated with improved survival on multivariate analysis, especially in Caucasian patients (HR of death: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.76-0.97; p = 0.012).ConclusionADT was associated with improved outcome for NSCLC, in line with the hypothesis of a role for the androgen receptor in lung cancer. Our findings support a systematic evaluation of the potential benefit of ADT as a therapy for lung cancer.
| S-EPMC9265064 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND:Recent studies have indicated that the incidence of esophageal cancer has declined in the past decade in the U.S. However, trends in the incidence and survival have not been thoroughly examined. METHODS:Data from 46?063 patients with esophageal cancer between 1973 and 2015 were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The trends in the age-adjusted incidence and survival were analyzed using joinpoint regression models. RESULTS:The age-adjusted incidence of esophageal cancer increased from 5.55 to 7.44 per 100?000 person-years between 1973 and 2004. Later, it decreased at an annual percentage change of 1.23%. In the last 40?years, the strong male predominance increased slightly. Importantly, the percentage of patients with localized stage of squamous cell cancer decreased. It was observed that the incidence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma declined since 1986, while the incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma sharply increased since 1973 and surpassed the rate of squamous cell cancer, mainly due to the increase in the incidence among men. Consistently, the estimated 40-year limited-duration prevalence of esophageal adenocarcinoma was higher than that of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Additionally, we observed a modest but significant improvement in survival during the study period. CONCLUSION:The incidence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma has decreased significantly over the past four decades in the U.S., while the incidence of adenocarcinoma has increased, particularly among men. Overall, the long-term survival of patients with esophageal cancer is poor but it has improved over the past decades, especially for the localized disease. KEY POINTS:Significant findings of the study The incidence of esophageal cancer has decreased at an annual percentage change of 1.23% since 2004. The incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma has sharply increased since 1973 and surpassed the rate of squamous cell cancer, mainly due to the increase in the incidence among men. What this study adds There has been a shift in the prevalence of esophageal cancer histological subtypes over the past decades in the U.S. We found that the incidence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma has continued to decrease, while the esophageal adenocarcinoma rate has continued to increase.
| S-EPMC7180574 | biostudies-literature
Project description:To measure transarterial chemoembolization utilization and survival benefit among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) patient population.A retrospective study identified 37,832 patients with HCC diagnosed between 1991 and 2011. Survival was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test. Propensity-score matching was used to address an imbalance of covariates.More than 75% of patients with HCC did not receive any HCC-directed treatment. Transarterial chemoembolization was the most common initial therapy (15.9%). Factors associated with the use of chemoembolization included younger age, more HCC risk factors, more comorbidities, higher socioeconomic status, intrahepatic tumor, unifocal tumor, vascular invasion, and smaller tumor size (all P < .001). Median survival was improved in patients treated with chemoembolization compared with those not treated with chemoembolization (20.1 vs 4.3 mo; P < .0001). Similar findings were demonstrated in propensity-scoring analysis (14.5 vs 4.2 mo; P < .0001) and immortal time bias sensitivity analysis (9.5 vs 3.6 mo; P < .0001). There was a significantly improved survival hazard ratio (HR) in patients treated with chemoembolization (HR, 0.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.39-0.45).Patients with HCC treated with transarterial chemoembolization experienced a significant survival advantage compared with those not treated with transarterial chemoembolization. More than 75% of SEER/Medicare patients diagnosed with HCC received no identifiable oncologic treatment. There is a significant public health need to increase awareness of efficacious HCC treatments such as transarterial chemoembolization.
| S-EPMC5258671 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThis study aims to compare the incidence and clinical and survival characteristics of adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas (ASCP) and adenomatous carcinoma of the pancreas (ACP), analyze the survival factors of ASCP and construct a prognostic model.MethodPatients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer from 2000 to 2018 are selected from the SEER database. ASCP and ACP are compared in terms of epidemiology, clinical characteristics and prognosis. Cases are matched in a 1:2 ratio, and survival analysis is performed. The Cox proportional hazard model is used to determine covariates related to overall survival (OS), and an ASCP prognosis nomogram is constructed and verified by consistency index (C-index), calibration chart and decision curve analysis (DCA). The accuracy of the model is compared with that of AJCC.Stage and SEER.Stage to obtain the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.Resultsthe age-adjusted incidence of ACP increased significantly over time from 2000 to 2008 and from 2008 to 2018 (P < 0.05). APC was 2.01% (95% CI: 1.95-2.21) and 1.08% (95% CI: 0.93-1.25) respectively. The age-adjusted incidence of ASCP increased with time from 2000 to 2018 (P < 0.05) and APC was 3.64% (95% CI: 3.25-4.01).After propensity score matching (PSM), the OS and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of ACP are better than those of ASCP. The survival time of ASCP is significantly improved by the combined treatment of surgery + chemotherapy + radiotherapy, with a median OS of 31 months. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis shows that age, race, surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy and tumor size are independent factors affecting the prognosis. DCA and area under the curve (AUC) value shows that the model has good discrimination ability.ConclusionThe OS prognosis of ASCP is worse than that of ACP, and the nomogram has high accuracy for the prognosis prediction of ASCP.
| S-EPMC9263703 | biostudies-literature