Dataset Information

A clinical model to predict distant metastasis in patients with superficial gastric cancer with negative lymph node metastasis and a survival analysis for patients with metastasis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Distant metastasis (DM) is relatively rare in superficial gastric cancer (SGC), especially in patients without lymph node metastasis. This study aimed to explore the main clinical risk factors for DM in patients with superficial gastric cancer-no lymph node metastasis (SGC-NLNM) and the prognostic factors for patients with DM.

Methods

Records of patients with SGC-NLNM between 2004 and 2015 were collected from the public Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Both univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were performed to analyze the clinical risk factors for DM. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression model were used to identify prognostic factors for patients with DM. A nomogram was built based on multivariate logistic regression and evaluated by the C-index, the calibration, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

Results

We developed and validated a nomogram to predict DM in patients with SGC-NLNM, showing that race, age, primary site, depth, size, and grade were independent risk factors. The built nomogram had a good discriminatory performance, with a C-index of 0.836 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.813-0.859). Calibration plots showed that the predicted DM probability was identical to the actual observations in both the training and validation sets. AUC was 0.846 (95% CI: 0.820-0.871) and 0.801 (95% CI: 0.751-0.850) in the training and validation sets, respectively. The results of the survival analysis revealed that surgery (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.249; 95% CI, 0.125-0.495), chemotherapy (HR = 0.473; 95% CI, 0.353-0.633), and grade (HR = 1.374; 95% CI, 1.018-1.854) were independent prognostic factors associated with cancer-specific survival (CSS), but radiotherapy was not (log-rank test, p = 0.676).

Conclusions

We constructed a sensitive and discriminative nomogram to identify high-risk patients with SGC-NLNM who may harbor dissemination at initial diagnosis. The tumor size and primary site were the largest contributors to DM prediction. Compared with radiotherapy, aggressive surgery, and chemotherapy may be better options for patients with DM.

SUBMITTER: Chen J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7897959 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A clinical model to predict distant metastasis in patients with superficial gastric cancer with negative lymph node metastasis and a survival analysis for patients with metastasis.

Chen Jingyu J Wu Lunpo L Zhang Zizhen Z Zheng Sheng S Lin Yifeng Y Ding Ning N Sun Jiawei J Shi Liuhong L Xue Meng M

Cancer medicine 20201222 3

<h4>Background</h4>Distant metastasis (DM) is relatively rare in superficial gastric cancer (SGC), especially in patients without lymph node metastasis. This study aimed to explore the main clinical risk factors for DM in patients with superficial gastric cancer-no lymph node metastasis (SGC-NLNM) and the prognostic factors for patients with DM.<h4>Methods</h4>Records of patients with SGC-NLNM between 2004 and 2015 were collected from the public Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) ...[more]

PMID: 33350173

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe prognosis of lymph node-negative triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is still worse than that of other subtypes despite adjuvant chemotherapy. Reliable prognostic biomarkers are required to identify lymph node-negative TNBC patients at a high risk of distant metastasis and optimize individual treatment.MethodsWe analyzed the RNA sequencing data of primary tumor tissue and the clinicopathological data of 202 lymph node-negative TNBC patients. The cohort was randomly divided into training and validation sets. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator Cox regression and multivariate Cox regression were used to construct the prognostic model.ResultsA clinical prognostic model, seven-gene signature, and combined model were constructed using the training set and validated using the validation set. The seven-gene signature was established based on the genomic variables associated with distant metastasis after shrinkage correction. The difference in the risk of distant metastasis between the low- and high-risk groups was statistically significant using the seven-gene signature (training set: P < 0.001; validation set: P = 0.039). The combined model showed significance in the training set (P < 0.001) and trended toward significance in the validation set (P = 0.071). The seven-gene signature showed improved prognostic accuracy relative to the clinical signature in the training data (AUC value of 4-year ROC, 0.879 vs. 0.699, P = 0.046). Moreover, the composite clinical and gene signature also showed improved prognostic accuracy relative to the clinical signature (AUC value of 4-year ROC: 0.888 vs. 0.699, P = 0.029; AUC value of 5-year ROC: 0.882 vs. 0.693, P = 0.038). A nomogram model was constructed with the seven-gene signature, patient age, and tumor size.ConclusionsThe proposed signature may improve the risk stratification of lymph node-negative TNBC patients. High-risk lymph node-negative TNBC patients may benefit from treatment escalation.

Project description:Expression profiling of breast cancer tumours, comparing 10 year survivors to deceased patients Background It is of great significance to find better markers to correctly distinguish between high-risk and low-risk breast cancer patients since the majority of breast cancer cases are at present being overtreated. Methods 46 tumours from node-negative breast cancer patients were studied with gene expression microarrays. A t-test was carried out in order to find a set of genes where the expression might predict clinical outcome. Two classifiers were used to evaluate the gene lists on the different data sets, a correlation-based classifier and a VFI (Voting Features Interval) classifier. We then evaluated the predictive accuracy of this expression signature on tumour sets from two similar studies on lymph-node negative patients which had developed gene expression signatures superior to current methods in classifying node-negative breast tumours. These two signatures were also tested on our material. Results A list of 51 genes whose expression profiles could predict clinical outcome with high accuracy in our material (96% or 89% accuracy in cross-validation, depending on type of classifier) was developed. When tested on two independent data sets, the expression signature based on the 51 identified genes had good predictive qualities in one of the data sets (74% accuracy), whereas their predictive value on the other data set were poor, presumably due to the fact that only 23 of the 51 genes were found in that material. We also found that previously developed expression signatures could predict clinical outcome well to moderately well in our material (72% and 61%, respectively). Conclusion The list of 51 genes derived in this study might have potential for clinical utility as a prognostic gene set, and may include candidate genes of potential relevance for clinical outcome in breast cancer. According to the predictions by this expression signature, 30 of the 46 patients should have had different adjuvant treatment than they did. Keywords: Expression Microarray, Lymph-node-negative Breast Cancer, Clinical Outcome, Classification 23 fresh frozen primary node negative breast cancer tumours from 10 year survivors were compared to 23 tumours from deceased patients in order to find genes where the expression differed between the two groups Microarrays were produced at the Swegene DNA Microarray Resource Center, Department of Oncology, Lund University, Sweden (http://swegene.onk.lu.se). Frozen tumours were homogenized together with TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). From the cell-suspension total RNA was extracted using RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The quality of the RNA was evaluated with the Agilent 2100 BioAnalyser (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA). Specimens where the 28S/16S ratio was lower than 1.0 or the RIN-value was lower than 6.7 were excluded from the study. For each sample, Cy3-dCTP (Amersham Biosciences, Buckinghamshire, UK) labelled probes were synthesized from 5 µg of the total tumour RNA and Cy5-dCTP (Amersham Biosciences) labelled reference were synthesized from 5 µg of commercial reference RNA (Universal Human Reference RNA, Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA) by reverse transcription. The probes were purified using ChipShot™ labelling cleanup system (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). The hybridizations were carried out using Pronto! Micro Array reagent systems (Corning Inc., Corning, NY, USA). For each sample, labelled tumour cDNA and reference cDNA were co-precipitated and hybridised to the microarray slide. The microarray slides were scanned with Agilent microarray scanner G2565AA (Agilent Technologies) and image analysis was performed using the Genepix 6.0.0.45 software (Axon Instruments, Union City, CA, USA).

Dataset Information

A clinical model to predict distant metastasis in patients with superficial gastric cancer with negative lymph node metastasis and a survival analysis for patients with metastasis.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

A clinical model to predict distant metastasis in patients with superficial gastric cancer with negative lymph node metastasis and a survival analysis for patients with metastasis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets