Dataset Information

Hemopericardium with subsequent cardiac tamponade secondary to rivaroxaban treatment: a case report.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The use and utility of novel oral anticoagulants has been increasing in clinical practice due to their relatively lower incidence of side effects such as intracranial haemorrhage, particularly in the elderly, when compared with vitamin K antagonists. Rivaroxaban is a factor Xa and prothrombinase inhibitor indicated for stroke and venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in non-valvular atrial fibrillation as well as treatment of venous thromboembolism.

Case summary

A patient with history of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation on Rivaroxaban presented with generalized malaise, lightheadedness, and dizziness. The patient was found to be in profound cardiogenic shock despite unremarkable cardiac enzymes. Electrocardiogram revealed rate controlled atrial fibrillation and T-wave inversions in the inferolateral leads without associated electrical alternans. Bedside echocardiogram revealed a large pericardial effusion consistent with cardiac tamponade physiology. Following anticoagulation reversal, the patient underwent urgent pericardiocentesis yielding haemorrhagic fluid, with subsequent improvement in haemodynamic status. Despite the presence of retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy on previous computed tomography of the abdomen and concern for underlying malignant effusion secondary to lymphoma, cytology of the fluid revealed no evidence of malignant cells and follow-up flow cytometry and bone marrow biopsy were unremarkable.

Discussion

While hemopericardium is not listed as a known side effect of Rivaroxaban, previous cases of hemopericardium secondary to Rivaroxaban have been described in the literature secondary to pre-disposing risk factors including CYP450 drug interactions or cardiac device implantations. In this case, the patient experienced a spontaneous hemopericardium on Rivaroxaban without any previously elucidated risk factors or evidence of malignancy.

SUBMITTER: Shastri P

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7898561 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundPericardiocentesis is an effective treatment for cardiac tamponade, but there are risks, including haemorrhagic events, cardiac perforation, pneumothorax, arrhythmia, acute pulmonary oedema and so on. Mediastinal effusion caused by puncture is rarely reported.Case presentationA 47-year-old man who had a history of right leg deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary artery embolism with implantation of an inferior vena cava filter presented for inferior vena cava filter removal. Within 30 min after the procedure, he developed chest pain, nausea, vomiting and presyncope with shock. Echocardiography confirmed massive pericardial effusion with evidence of cardiac tamponade. Emergency pericardiocentesis was performed. Confusingly, only 3 mL of bloody pericardial effusion was drained in total, and subsequently, the patient's symptoms rapidly improved with stable haemodynamics. Repeat echocardiography showed that the pericardial effusion had disappeared. Urgent computed tomography pulmonary angiography demonstrated localized effusion, which was not seen the previous computed tomography results and was noted around the left ventricle in the mediastinal apace. No intervention was performed, given that there was no bleeding tendency or further adverse events related to the mediastinal effusion. The patient was subsequently discharged in a stable condition a few days later, and outpatient follow-up was advised.ConclusionsMediastinal effusion is a rare complication of pericardiocentesis. In the case described herein, the most likely cause was pericardial effusion extravasated into the mediastinum through the needle insertion site in the puncture process due to large pressure variations in the intrapericardial space with tamponade, differing from cases of over-anticoagulation reported in the previous literature. Just as our case demonstrates that conservative treatment of an hemodynamic insignificant mediastinal effusion may be appropriate. Echocardiography is useful and effective to minimize complication rates.