Dataset Information

Neoadjuvant therapy of cetuximab combined with chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer: A single-arm meta-analysis of noncomparative clinical studies and randomized controlled trials.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy combined with radical resection has reduced local recurrence rates in rectal cancer. Cetuximab shows improvement in rectal cancer treatment. But the role for neoadjuvant therapy of cetuximab combined with chenmoradiotherapy in rectal cancer remains unclear. The present study aimed to use meta-analytical techniques to assess its benefit and risk.

Materials and methods

We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase to identify the correlational non-comparative clinical studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The primary endpoints of interest were pathological complete response (pCR), complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease, progressive disease (PD), R0-resection, R1-resection, and R2-resection. The secondary included any grade of toxicity.

Results

Eleven investigations (9 noncomparative open-label cohort studies and 2 randomized controlled trials) involving 550 patients were ultimately included. The pooled estimates of pCR was 10% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7%-13%, I2?=?55.9%). Simultaneously, only a small amount of patients achieved CR (11%, 95% CI: 7%-15%, I2?=?44.0%), which was consistent with pCR. Besides, R0 resection (93%, 95% CI: 90%-96%, I2?=?16.5%) seemed to be increased but need further exploration. The safety was also calculated, and most of the toxicities were moderate.

Conclusion

Neoadjuvant therapy of cetuximab combined with chemoradiotherapy could not improve pCR. The raise of R0-resection rate needed to be verified by more high-quality and well-designed RCTs. Meanwhile, the morbidity of toxicity was relatively mild and acceptable.

SUBMITTER: Yan Q

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7899853 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Neoadjuvant therapy of cetuximab combined with chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer: A single-arm meta-analysis of noncomparative clinical studies and randomized controlled trials.

Yan Qi Q Zhu Jun-Jing JJ Zhao Fang-Min FM Shu Qi-Jin QJ Chen Shu-Yi SY

Medicine 20210201 7

<h4>Objective</h4>Preoperative chemoradiotherapy combined with radical resection has reduced local recurrence rates in rectal cancer. Cetuximab shows improvement in rectal cancer treatment. But the role for neoadjuvant therapy of cetuximab combined with chenmoradiotherapy in rectal cancer remains unclear. The present study aimed to use meta-analytical techniques to assess its benefit and risk.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase to identify the correlati ...[more]

PMID: 33607800

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) is the treatment of choice in advanced rectal cancer, even though there are many patients who will not benefit from it. There are still no effective methods for predicting which patients will respond or not. The present study aimed to define the genomic profile of rectal tumors and to identify alterations that are predictive of response in order to optimize therapeutic strategies. Methods: Forty-eight candidates for NCRT were recruited and their pretherapy biopsies analyzed by array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH). Pathologic response was evaluated by tumor regression grade (TRG).Results: Both Smoothing and Hidden Markov Model (HMM) approaches identified similar alterations, with a prevalence of DNA gains. Non responsive patients had a different alteration profile from responsive ones, with a higher number of genome changes mainly located on 2q21, 7q21, 7q36, 13q12, 13q32-34, 16p13, 17p12 chromosomal regions. Conclusion: This exploratory study suggests that an in depth characterization of chromosomal alterations by aCGH would provide useful predictive information about response to NCRT and help to optimize therapy in rectal cancer patients. 48 samples included in the study were analyzed on whole genome BAC arrays with the aim to characterize genomic alterations and correlate them with the tumor response to therapy. The case series was composed by 15%,81% and 4% of uT2, uT3 and uT4 tumors, respectively. At the diagnosis 56% of patients had uN0 tumors and 44% uN+. 30%,13%, 23% and 34% of patients reached/mantained respectively ypT0, ypT1, ypT2 and ypT3. With regard to response to NCRT, according to TRG criteria proposed by Dworak, two group were defined: non responders (TRG0-2= 56%) and responders (TRG3-4=44%). Clinical and pathological parameters: uT: pre-therapy stage determined by ultrasounds techniques uN: pre-therapy lymph node status determined by ultrasounds techniques ypT: pathologic stage after a neoadjuvant treatment ypN: pathologic lymph node status after a neoadjuvant treatment

Project description:PurposeTo validate the finding of an association between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and toxicity during chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in rectal cancer patients, in an independent population.Methods and materialsThe cohort consisted of 165 patients who received CRT for rectal cancer from 2006 to 2012. Prospectively recorded toxicity information, graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0, was retrieved from the medical record. Additionally, a subset of 52 patients recorded their gastrointestinal symptoms weekly during CRT, using the 7-item Bowel Problems Scale. Deoxyribonucleic acid was extracted from normal tissue in the proctectomy specimens and screened for 3 SNPs: XRCC1 R399Q, XPD K751Q, and TGFβ1 R25P. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were constructed.ResultsThe median radiation dose was 50.4 Gy, and all patients received concurrent chemotherapy. Toxicities measured by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events were closely associated with patient-reported outcomes for the patients who completed the 7-item Bowel Problems Scale. Grade ≥3 toxicity occurred during CRT in 14 patients (8%). All 14 patients had either XRCC1 R399Q or TGFβ1 R25P polymorphisms. The TGFβ1 R25P polymorphism was significantly associated with grade ≥3 toxicity (odds ratio [OR] 3.47, P=.04) and, in patients who completed the Bowel Problems Scale, with grade ≥4 toxicity (OR 5.61, P=.02). The latter finding persisted in a multivariable logistic regression model controlling for ethnicity, age, and sex (adjusted OR 1.83, P=.02).ConclusionsWe have validated the correlation between the TGFβ1 R25P SNP and acute toxicity during CRT in an independent cohort using both clinician- and patient-reported toxicity. The information from our study could be used as a basis to formulate a prospective trial testing the utility of this SNP as a biomarker of acute toxicity during neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer.

Project description:BackgroundThe aim of this paper is to share the methodological problems of an unsuccessful prospective single-arm feasibility trial conducted to evaluate the safety and feasibility of a 12-week progressive exercise intervention for adults undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer, as well as offer recommendations for future trials.MethodsThe initial plan was to recruit adults diagnosed with rectal cancer and scheduled for neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy over a 12-month period. The exercise intervention was to consist of supervised exercise sessions delivered three times per week by a trained exercise specialist. Feasibility (i.e., recruitment, adherence, and compliance rates) and safety (i.e., adverse events) were to be assessed throughout the trial, and patient-reported and physical health outcomes were to be assessed pre- and post-intervention. After 8 months of open recruitment, we had been unable to successfully enroll patients into our trial. We therefore modified our eligibility criteria to increase the number of patients that could be recruited into our trial, and in turn increase our recruitment rate. We also amended our recruitment procedures to ensure we could reach patients who were either awaiting treatment, receiving treatment, or had completed treatments in the past 5 years. In doing so, we added a research objective, namely to determine the optimal timing of conducting an exercise intervention with adults diagnosed with rectal cancer (i.e., during neoadjuvant treatment, after surgery, during adjuvant treatment, or post-treatment).ResultsMany problems continued to hinder the progress of our trial, particularly the low recruitment rate and the failure to enroll the required sample size that would make our results reliable.ConclusionThis led us to conclude that our trial was not feasible and that it is advisable to consider some elements carefully (e.g., recruitment strategies, communication, and trial location) before designing and conducting future trials. If one or more of these elements still proves to be problematic, trial results risk being compromised and alternative approaches should be considered.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03049124 . Registered on 02 September 2017.

Dataset Information

Neoadjuvant therapy of cetuximab combined with chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer: A single-arm meta-analysis of noncomparative clinical studies and randomized controlled trials.

Objective

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Neoadjuvant therapy of cetuximab combined with chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer: A single-arm meta-analysis of noncomparative clinical studies and randomized controlled trials.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets